Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sleep apnea secondary to diabetes

Rate this question


Tomio

Question

I am brand new to this group and was surprised not to find any posts about claiming sleep apnea as secondary to diabetes type 2.  Perhaps I'm just not looking hard enough.  My claim for diabetes was approved as presumptive  due to agent orange exposure

 My sleep apnea was disapproved as not being service connected.  I submitted an NOD claiming my sleep apnea as secondary to my service connected disability.  I did a lot of research in this area and found several articles which clearly stated that diabetes can cause sleep apnea. I submitted excerpts from these articles acknowledging that these articles address the general population and not my particular case.  I also submitted a statement from my physician who has been my treating physician for over 20 years.  In his statement he said that I was diagnosed with diabetes while under his care and subsequently diagnosed with severe sleep apnea requiring the wear of a CPAP machine.  He clearly stated that he's in the best position to comment on my medical history and current situation.   He concluded that based on well known studies and based on his personal knowledge if my medical situation, he can eliminate possible causes of sleep apnea such as obesity, neck and throat characteristics, smoking, and alcohol consumption and conclude that is more likely than not that there is a causal relationship between my service connected diabetes and my subsequent diagnosis of sleep apnea.

I did a search on BVA decisions on this subject and was surprised to see so few and was even more surprised about the win loss ratio.  Of 6 cases, only one was approved and that one was based on the veteran claiming that because he was diabetic, he was prescribed medication that caused him to become obese and because of his obesity, he developed sleep apnea.  He also submitted doctors statements from several doctors supporting his contention. I believe two cases were remanded and all the remaining cases were quite weak on my opinion. 

The reason I'm posting this is because I'm trying to find that glimmer of hope while I await the decision of the DRO. Anyone out there have any advice or encouraging words for this guy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Does the VA have that Opinion?

Did they have it when they made their decision?

Did it follow the IMO/IME criteria here at hadit under "Read First if Getting an IMO"...

actually it seems it did but

Did they list it as Evidence in the decision?

If they had it and didn't use it, that is a violation of 38 CFR 4.6 (CUE)

If they did have it and listed it as evidence as then opined on why they did not accept it under BOD (Relative Equipoise) we sure need to read the decision to help more.

Can you scan and attach their denial here (cover C file, name, address etc prior to scanning it)?

  "He concluded that based on well known studies and based on his personal knowledge if my medical situation, he can eliminate possible causes of sleep apnea such as obesity, neck and throat characteristics, smoking, and alcohol consumption and conclude that is more likely than not that there is a causal relationship between my service connected diabetes and my subsequent diagnosis of sleep apnea. "

Did he enhance that statement  as to the casual relationship with a full medical rationale? As well as some good medical citations?

Did he give them a complete Curriculam Vitae or at least a rundown of his expertise in the field of diabetes?

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

When you researched OSA, generally all medical articles have a list of about 12+- contributing factors, age, Weight, Male, Family History, Neck size, Wide Tongue, Alcohol use/abuse, medications, just to name a few. Then there are the actual DX'd medical conditions that may be associated as actual causative factors. All must be an established DX, prior to SA symptoms or actual SA DX.

As to getting SA SC'd for Diabettes II or PTSD, very very dificult. Can't say I've seen any success stories here on Hadit.

I think it all comes down to a "Preponderance of Medical Evidence," and a Sleep Specialist's DBQ or Clinician Notes, indicating very clearly, (More Likely than not) that your SA is directly related to your Diabetes II.

Other than your DB II, how do you stack up against the list of usual suspects?

A redacted copy of your C & P SA DBQ and copy of Denial letter would be helpful.

Semper Fi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Have you been able to google the C & P doc whose exam denied the claim?

They might have been a gynecologist. or a nurse. or at least someone with no expertise at all in Endocrinology.

A VA Endo went against my AO DMII death claim twice.

I had 3 IM0s for, ( 2 from NeuroRadiologist- Dr Bash and a freeby from a former VA Neurologist) so BVA wanted one more against but I proved the remand called for a cardiologist and I got a PA's opinion instead. I know more about cardiology than he did. I pointed out medically , how speculative his statements were, to the BVA and they agreed and didn't consider that opinion at all  and awarded.

When they try to knock down our IM0s we MUST know down their quacks...ooops I mean C & P "docs".

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gastone and Berta.  Thanks for your posts.  I am a 68 yr old Asian male who weighs 138 pounds with a BMI of around 23 and I have a scrawny 14 and a half inch neck.  I have never smoked and  have not drank alcohol in over 20 years.  There is no family history od sleep apnea and I have no abnormalities in my oral and throat area.  I can't understand why there has been so little success in this area

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use