Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
VA Disability Claims: 5 Game-Changing Precedential Decisions You Need to Know
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
Rating Issues
Continue Reading on HadIt.com-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Are all military medical records on file at the VA?
RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.-
- 4 replies
Picked By
RichardZ, -
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
ADodge
I have reposted this because originally I had posted it under someone else's question and I was asked to repost under a new topic. Simply because I might get more answers and also there might be other VETs out there with a similar situation who could benefit from the advice given.
I hope I am not repeating someone else's question. This is not at all easy to understand. So I'll just ask. I was discharged in 1984 from the Navy. I had married an active duty Navy enlisted and so my health care was still at the same base I was discharged from. After 3 months post discharge the Doctor that was handling my health care suggested I file a claim for Asthma service connected. Because when I joined the Service in 1980 I did not have Asthma but when I was discharged I was being treated for Asthma. So I filed the Claim in December if 1984. I was discharged the last day of March 1984. And my discharge was honorable so no problem there. The initial claim was that I filed was for Bronchial Asthma service connected. and it was denied in 1985. I didn't appeal it because back then I didn't know anything about appealing the denial and just figured that was it. The denial stated THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT ESTABLISH SERVICE CONNECTION FOR THE FOLLOWING BRONCHIAL ASTHMA DUE TO ALLERGY. Bronchial Asthma denied. (Funny that is what causes Asthma Allergies. but god knows I grew up on a farm and never had any problems with allergies at least not so much as to cause me a problem with breathing. And I had never been diagnosed with any allergies either before entering the service.) Anyway time passed and I forgot all about this claim. in 1997 I began receiving SSDI and part of my disability was the Asthma and by then I also had COPD. More time passed and in 2014 the VSO in the town I live in suggested I file a claim with the VA for service connected disability for asthma. So I did. And after again submitting to PFTs done by the VA I was approved at 60%. Now I would never have questioned anything after that except that when I filed for the COPD and a few other items I was told that my representative was the DAV. And I asked why was the DAV my representative and who in the DAV was. And I was told told that back in 1984 I picked the DAV to represent me. And I said " I did??? Why would I do that? and that response was "because you filed a claim back then. That was when I thought SHIT I need to get a copy of all my records. SO I finally did and that is when I learned and remember filing that claim. So Here is my question. Since Nothing except the severity of the Asthma has changed since 1984. Would that initial claim be a CUE? Wouldn't it be right to file a CUE regarding that claim so that the effective date of the current claim would date back to 1984? Currently I have a NOD filed regarding the effective date. But I really feel it is a CUE. Is that right or not? And if someone does answer this could you answer like you are explain this shit to a two year old!!!! LMAO because All of this is just so Damn confusing to me!!!
Thanks a lot,
I was asked to scan and post some VA C&P reports and I will do that as soon as I get back from meeting with my Local Congressman. I will keep you all in mind as I ask him about doing the back up of VET Appeals!!! And other Veteran topics!!!
Aileen
SO this is what Bertha asked in response to my previous post of this Question:
Did you or the rep specifically state "Due to Allergy" on the claim?
Do your SMRs reveal you did, in fact develop allergies in the military?
Can you scan and attach here their reasons and bases for the 1984 claim denial and the evidence they used?
Obviously, with the successful outcome of the 2014 claim for the asthma , the VA certainly considered your SMRs but it seems they missed something in the older denial....so maybe this would even by a 38 CFR 3.156 claim.
I know it is confusing but if we can see the older decision (and we might need the newer one too) we can determine whether there is cause for potentially more retro due to a better EED.
Did the 2014 claim state the asthma was 'due to' allergies?
Cover C file number, name, address, prior to scanning and attaching it here.
I focused on the 'due to ' part because statements like that can lock us in to one theory of entitlement when other theories could be 'due to exposure to chemicals, via your MOS etc etc.
So Here is what I have but I also have this very strange 600 form that was placed in my medical record at the end of my in-active reserve time. Notice the date Apr 8 86 See all the things it list that I am suppose to be allergic to. Well if I had been allergic to all those things before I joined the Navy I would never have been able to join the Navy because I would have died as a child. Considering I grew up on a Farm!!!! I mean WTF who the hell is this Captain English and why is he putting this document in my Military medical record years after my discharge???? I don't understand!!!! This is way too screwy!!!
Edited by ADodgeremov files
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
12
6
3
Popular Days
May 11
7
May 6
6
May 12
5
May 15
4
Top Posters For This Question
ADodge 12 posts
syne7 6 posts
Berta 3 posts
Popular Days
May 11 2016
7 posts
May 6 2016
6 posts
May 12 2016
5 posts
May 15 2016
4 posts
Popular Posts
pwrslm
I had a friend with 4th stage ovarian cancer that was reversed using cannabis oil. Yup, pot might actually have a medical use after all...some Dr in Canada cured 5k people with the stuff...now they w
pwrslm
One would think that as many remands that the BVA makes, that the Sr. member in charge of ratings in the RO would take this job more seriously! According to the AL, more than 55% of appeals conta
ADodge
What bothers me is the top paragraph of page 4 of 8 . To Quote it states " The effective date of this grant is September 9, 2014. Service connection has been established from the day VA received yo
36 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now