Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Attorney Telephone Consultation

Rate this question


63Charlie

Question

Had bad vibes from an attorney today while seeking someone to help me with my claims..

Bad Vibe#1.;

 Was given a date and time that we would have the phone consultation, and he was 45 minutes late calling me.

If I am NOT important enough for him to be PUNCTUAL at the beginning of our dealings, I'm thinking it will only get worse after I sign the contract allowing him to represent me.

 

Bad Vibe #2;

I ALWAYS like to meet someone face to face before I decide to use their services.

Wanting to do it by phone seems too impersonal, and made me seem insignificant.

Plus, I like to get a read on somebody by their facial expressions and body language.

 

 

Bad Vibe #3;

2. He is telling me he is sure he can get me at least 70% and TDIU for my PTSD that was granted but not service connected.

Told me he has great doctors to file an IMO, and get my rating service connected and and at a ratable 70% disability.

He isn't God, and has no idea what's in my C-File, and to tell me this, scares me.

 

Bad Vibe #4;

3. Cost

His charge will be 30% of award of compensation.

He also said I would have to pay a cost for IMO of $2000.00.

I said "Why do you charge 30%?"

He said, "Because I am worth it."

 

He's mailing the contract  for my signature.

Something tells me it will have disclaimers, hidden fees, and a lot of stuff that will really be bad.

Currently the VA  granted a 1151 claim based on negligence, for anxiety and depression @ 50%.

I have two more open claims.

One is 1151 for spine, the other is tinnitus/hearing loss.

Checked Ebenefits and  the decision letter on the tinnitus/hearing is in the mail

I didn't see a new disability added, so it must be a denial letter.

So.... they going to deny a tinnitus claim by a person that worked on 671 Detroit Diesels as a mechanic for almost two years?

 

The attorney seemed disinterested in the spine, and other claims.

I told him the spine claim has been deferred, and he asked if the VA has done a C&P for my spine. I told him, no.

Attorney told me he'll file a NOD on the PTSD non-service connection, and get a copy of my C-File.

Seemed to me that is where he is focused , on the PTSD.

I don't know why.

 

I'm near Orlando.

Any suggestions/recommendations for a law firm besides Hill and Ponton?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It's a fact.  Lawyers don't do "warm and fuzzy".  However, some specialize in PTSD, and know what it takes to get such a claim through the process.

To you ... it's personal, as it should be.

To them ... it's a well-worn process.  No emotions.

30% is on the high side, although that is what I am giving up for my MH condition, for an expert in the field.  The IMO, should come out of that 30%, imvho.

Benching your pursuit of those claims (other than the PTSD claim), is strategic in nature.  Wait until you get 70% for PTSD (the going rate), and then pursue your other claims.  Don't want to have one claim "jamming" the system, postponing the VA decision on the PTSD.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm going with my gut feelings and finding an attorney elsewhere.

Based on my previous experiences, and weighing the outcomes, I'm trusting my gut feelings

A consultation is scheduled with a different attorney on Friday.

I choose to live my life with "no regrets".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

as for an attorney calling you late, he could have been in court and he was running late. he could have been in a conference with a client and ran late. i would expect lawyers to be more late than on time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use