Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Help understanding rating code 5003

Rate this question


saxman

Question

I need help understanding rating code 5003.  I was rated 10 percent for a both my hands under this code for arthritis.  My question is I know it said for group of minor joints, but is that for each group minor joints meaning each group of each hand or all meaning both hands together?  If it is for each hand then it should be 10 percent for each hand because each hand is a minor group of joint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Saxman, the way I understand it is if there is xray evidence of arthritis and there is no limited or painful motion or no incapacitating episodes then the rating for two or more major joints or two or more groups of minor joints is 10%. This is from M21-1 and the award is 10% for both knees and not 10% for each knee.  If your arthritis were in only one hand then it would be rated at 0%..

III.iv.4.A.8.b.  Example of DegenerativeArthritisEvaluated Based on X-Ray Evidence Only
 

Situation:  The Veteran has x-ray evidence of degenerative arthritis of both knees without

  • limited or painful motion of any of the affected joints, or
  • incapacitating episodes.

Coded Conclusion:

 

1. SC (PTE INC)

 

5003

Degenerative arthritis of the knees, x-ray evidence

10% from 12-30-01

 

Rationale: There is no limited or painful motion in either joint, but there is x-ray evidence of arthritis in more than one joint to warrant a 10-percent evaluation under 38 CFR 4.71a, DC 5003.


III.iv.4.A.8.c.  Example of Noncompensable DegenerativeArthritis of a Single Joint
 

Situation:  The Veteran has x-ray evidence of degenerative arthritis of the right knee without limited or painful motion.

Coded Conclusion:

 

1. SC (PTE INC)

 

5003

Degenerative arthritis, right knee, x-ray evidence only

0% from 12-30-01

 
 

Rationale: There is no limited or painful motion in the right knee or x-ray evidence of arthritis in more than one joint to warrant a compensable evaluation under 38 CFR 4.71a, DC 5003.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Founder

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=7d0af00bd6c9cb96254a5a94bf46bbc4&mc=true&node=se38.1.4_171a&rgn=div8

5003   Arthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis):  
Degenerative arthritis established by X-ray findings will be rated on the basis of limitation of motion under the appropriate diagnostic codes for the specific joint or joints involved (DC 5200 etc.). When however, the limitation of motion of the specific joint or joints involved is noncompensable under the appropriate diagnostic codes, a rating of 10 pct is for application for each such major joint or group of minor joints affected by limitation of motion, to be combined, not added under diagnostic code 5003. Limitation of motion must be objectively confirmed by findings such as swelling, muscle spasm, or satisfactory evidence of painful motion. In the absence of limitation of motion, rate as below:  
With X-ray evidence of involvement of 2 or more major joints or 2 or more minor joint groups, with occasional incapacitating exacerbations 20
With X-ray evidence of involvement of 2 or more major joints or 2 or more minor joint groups 10
Note (1): The 20 pct and 10 pct ratings based on X-ray findings, above, will not be combined with ratings based on limitation of motion.  
Note (2): The 20 pct and 10 pct ratings based on X-ray findings, above, will not be utilized in rating conditions listed under diagnostic codes 5013 to 5024, inclusive.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I recently found out that I have "Mild Tri-compartmental Osteoarthritis with a small joint effusion" in my right knee and I have "Quadriceps insertional enthesopathy is present". Having been 3 years retired from the Marine Corps I KNOW that this had to be attributed from running and running long distance (minimum 3 miles) consistently for 20 years and "humping" 20-30 miles with 60-70 packs on those days that called for it every time we went to the "field"???

I don't think that I have anything in my medical records that could relate to having any problems in my right knee. My question is that because osteoarthritis does not happen overnight... Can I file a claim and service connect this condition to military service???

Any information will help me in trying to claim this from the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Saxman:  

These are great answers! Especially Tbird and GS106!

Marine:  

I would prefer you ask your quesion in another topic since it borders on "hijacking".  However, since your question was so close to that of the OP, I will answer. (But others may not, so you still should repost your qestions in a new topic)  

Its not enough YOU KNOW that your problems are from running long distances in the Marine Corps, even tho I would agree with you!  Unfortunately, our opinion to VA is useless.  You have to have a medical opinion which states "your (current diagnosis) is at least as likely as not due to running long distances in the USMC."

In other words, you need a doctors opinion, called a nexus.  You need to order your cfile, and see if a doc already made same opinion, and, if not, you can get an IMO/IME to render such opinion.  Absent this medical opinion, you have almost zero chance of getting this service connected.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use