Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

No Nexus Letter for You!

Rate this question


bfd2100red

Question

I really don't like stirring the pot or razing a ruckus, but I this needs to be addressed at higher levels (VA Secretary, Congress, Senate...?) I am asking for folks input who should I notify of "our" issue?

So, like many of you, I have gone through the service connected process. I have had some successes, but this is the one shining example of why the VA IS NOT in the business of helping/assisting Veterans.

I have had a claim denied twice, and its currently awaiting placement of the docket at the board of appeals. There is ample medical evidence, buddy statements in support of my claim...but the single piece of evidence holding me back is "the nexus letter." I asked for assistance, and was denied. How is it that none of my VA doctors can write a nexus letter thus confirming that my disability is related to my service? Is every Veteran that receives care from the VA forced to seek outside medical opinions to satisfy the VBA nexus requirement? If that isn't a huge obstacle put on veterans ...I don't know what is?

With that, I secure messaged my VA primary care doctor and was told (in writing)..."None of the primary care MDs at the clinic are able or credentialed to evaluate patients for disability. The evaluation requires specific training and education. I'm sorry the Maplewood clinic could not assist you further with this evaluation.

 

I would love to get other people opinion on this systemic problem (I know I'm not the only one).

Thanks,

Nick

USA (RET)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
7 minutes ago, bfd2100red said:

I secure messaged my VA primary care doctor and was told (in writing)..."None of the primary care MDs at the clinic are able or credentialed to evaluate patients for disability. The evaluation requires specific training and education. I'm sorry the Maplewood clinic could not assist you further with this evaluation.

This statement is actually correct because you need to be referred to a specialist working in their particular field like a Neurologist, or an Internal Medicine Specialist, or a Rheumatologist or something.  I am not sure if you have asked for a referral but that is what you need to do. Also and very, very important you do not need a nexus letter a nexus statement in your progress reports stating that your condition is military related or secondary to a service connected condition should be acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

They the VA Dr's & Phyistrist told me its not there job...if I am filing a claim for comp  I need to go see the DAV...I said yes but there not Dr's&on one of my DBQ's it stated can be filled out by a VA phyiscian or VA LCSW Therapist  and they sill declined ...so had to pay for a private Doc.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I could not find your prior posts here.

The denial letter will state exactly why they have not determined yet that you have established a "nexus".

" Is every Veteran that receives care from the VA forced to seek outside medical opinions to satisfy the VBA nexus requirement?"

No ,not every veteran.

It is difficult to determine what evidence they still need from you. Can you scan and attach the last denial here as to their "Reasons and Bases" and the Evidence list they used?

Cover C file etc prior to scanning it.

Many of us have had to pay big bucks for independent medical opinions.

It is a disgrace but so far nothing has been done about that. And never will be,in my opinion.

VA is supposed to weigh all evidence for and against a claim, but don't forget who owns the scale they use.

An IMO can be costly but is often the only way to succeed in many types of VA claims. The subsequent higher rating the IMO could generate, at some point, will cover and absorb the cost of the IMO.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta,

I have been service connected sometimes without a nexus statement, but I also have conditions stuck up at the BVA due to no nexus or a non-VA provider not using them exact terminology the VBA requires.

With a laundry list of SC disorders (90%), medical studies, family and buddy statements...all painting a clear picture, I still get denied the condition (OSA), but specifically denying due to no nexus letter.

I am fortunate to have a full time job with medical benefits. I have both a VA and NON-VA primary dr's. I have had non-VA docs fill out DBQ's, and had to fight to get them recognized because the "real doctors" didn't know that only specialy worded terminology (least as likely than not) is the only language the VBA understands.

For me, the thought of a Vet going into this battle...VA dr's claiming that they can't assist a VBA claim is a huge hurdle placed in front of many veterans that they may never overcome. Maybe things will never change, but I'm at least going to be sure my elected officials are aware of what is happening and maybe they can champion for Us???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What really stinks is when you have multiple entries in your SMRs dealing with the purported condition and the last one explicitly states that it is a recurring issue and contains other medical terminology as required by the rating system and they still deny you.

If I am not mistaken that there is what is called the "nexus" event.

But they get away by "consulting"an "expert" that waves their hands stating that they can ignore those facts when by regs the "benefit of the doubt" rule should have be applied.

But like Berta says, guess who owns the scales and who certifies that the scales are indeed accurate.

When you put the fox in charge of guarding the hen house.  The next day you don't exclaim; "where have all the chickens gone!?!" You politely ask; "did you enjoy your meal?"

40% Back

10% Tenitis

10% Left Knee

10% Anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
41 minutes ago, OldJoe said:

What really stinks is when you have multiple entries in your SMRs dealing with the purported condition and the last one explicitly states that it is a recurring issue and contains other medical terminology as required by the rating system and they still deny you.

Yes, this is what VA calls acute conditions. What you mean to tell me that my records show that I have been treated for this condition fifteen times in eight years and it is noted that it is recurring on several occasions and VA calls it acute,  Yep dumb jerks don't know what acute is.  Sorry, you are going to need that nexus statement my friend to win this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use