Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Highly Perturbed Of C&P Exams

Rate this question


Prettypantha

Question

Hi Everyone!

This Is By Far Confusing To Me. How Does One Come Up With Less Than Likely...When The Evidence Is There? The Following Are Results From My C&P Examinations! Please Give Your Insights As To What You Think. Sorry For The Inconvenience, Had To Screenshot The Results. Thanks! 

So, Where I'm Very Confused Pertaining To Hysterectomy Is: I Gave The Examiner Multiple Documents Of My Uterine Fibroids, And She Had The Computer Screen Opened Where She Showed Me, Other Documents Of The Fibroids. But Yet, She Answered...Was The Veteran's VA Claim File Reviewed? She Said No! Also, The Rationale Portion Noted Fibroids Uterine/Recurrent Pelvic Cramps Were Documented While In Service. Duhhhh!!!

image.jpeg

image.png

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

 
Edited by Prettypantha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I'm not a gynecologist, but I agree that as written the examiner's Opinion and Rationale do not seem to make sense. 

I wonder if the examiner checked the wrong box on the DBQ? The Opinion part is basically a 'Yes or No' checkbox, i.e., the examiner does not actually type, "The condition claimed was less likely than not...". The examiner does type the rationale, which is what makes me wonder if she checked the wrong box for the Opinion. 

Did the examiner answer the question about female sexual arousal disorder? I did not see it, but I could have missed it. 

Looks like the VSR (VBA employee who prepares the 2507--the request for exam) did a good job highlighting the pages of your service medical records (SMRs, also known as service treatment records or STRs).

I wonder if requesting a reconsideration--and pointing out the possibility of a simply clerical error, i.e., checking the wrong box on the DBQ--would be the best course of action. What does your veterans service officer think?

Disclaimer: Any suggestions I offer here are based on my experience as a C&P examiner. In addition to asking questions on this board, I recommend that you consult with a veterans service officer, claims agent, or veterans law attorney before making major decisions related to your claim or appeal. 

Mark D Worthen PsyD | Forensic Psychologist | Charlotte, North Carolina | PTSDexams.net (educational site: no ads, no affiliate links)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi @Mark D Worthen PsyD,

Thank you so much for having a look at my C&P results. Yes, I see exactly what you're referring to, perhaps the examiner may have checked the wrong box. The phrase that have, "the condition claimed was less likely than not" seems to be an embedded format of words that were already there. 

To answer your question about the female sexual arousal...that was all of it. It didn't have neither a section of yes or no, nor to write a summary. As you can see, it was a full page with no break.

My VSO initiated my claims, but after filing...I am basically on my own! He never return my calls, or texts. I make copies of documents to drop off to him while at the hospital and he's never in his office. So, for the most part, I'll either mail him a copy or place underneath his door/dropbox. Which he still doesn't contact me about nothing! Basically, I feel at this point...if there's a denial, all I can do to help my situation would be to hire an attorney. Still quite clueless to everything, but I'm trying my best to absorb as much as I can.

P.S. I thought she was a gynecologist too! But her post-nominal initials are PA-C. So, I realize that she's a Physician Assistant that's Certified. When she examined my feet, on the DBQ...there was a question on the 7th screenshot top portion asking, "was an opinion requested for the condition (internal VA only)? She answered, Yes! This leads me to think that she had to get another opinion, right?

P.P.S. If the rater is confused, will they get back in contact with her to clarify her statements? Thanks once again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Take a breath, step back, way to early to be talking about an Attorney @ 20% of Retro. Did you File an FDC or Reg Axx claim, big difference Decision Time-wise.

Always be prepared for a NOD but take it easy right now. All your supporting DXs & Medical Records are in your C-File, let the Rater do his/her job. Be prepared to address the DBQ errors if needed.

Try and relax, easy to say, tough to do, I know. Not much more you can or should do at this point.

Start reviewing VA Lawyer Chris Attig's posts and web site linked here on Hadit. Good Claims procedure info.

Check out the 38 CFR 4 for your conditions, what do you think your Rating should be?

Semper Fi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I don't normally fall into the role of 'spreading sunshine', but there is a chance the Rater may notice the discrepancy and correct it.  I think sometimes seeing the C&P can be stressful, even discouraging.  I had it 'all figured out' when I received mine and I see it happen with others over and over again as well.  When I got the ratings, over half were different then I expected.  Hang tight and try not to get too worked up yet, there is still a chance this works out for you without all of that being necessary.  Is there a way you could contact the evaluator, thru his/her office, maybe?  Possibly, IF you can get the examiner to review, they may even be able to fix it ahead of the Rater finally getting to your case.  Good Luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you @Gastone @TALON II FE,

You both are absolutely right! Yes, I will calm myself down and let it run its course! I will definitely review VA Lawyer Chris Attig's posts and try to get myself more acquainted with other case studies, as well as his expertise. Also, thank you for referencing about 38 CFR 4. I know now that there's a lot to stay abreast. I think with me feeling deserted by the VSO has a lot to do with my attitude, disposition and feeling some kind of way. I will take both of your advices and standfast. You guys have been so helpful during these long arduous trials. Thank you all for your candid support!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
14 hours ago, Prettypantha said:

To answer your question about the female sexual arousal...that was all of it. It didn't have neither a section of yes or no, nor to write a summary. As you can see, it was a full page with no break.

Hmmm. That's a pretty glaring error for the examiner to make IMHO. 

Quote

My VSO initiated my claims, but after filing...I am basically on my own! He never return my calls, or texts. I make copies of documents to drop off to him while at the hospital and he's never in his office. So, for the most part, I'll either mail him a copy or place underneath his door/dropbox. Which he still doesn't contact me about nothing! Basically, I feel at this point...if there's a denial, all I can do to help my situation would be to hire an attorney. Still quite clueless to everything, but I'm trying my best to absorb as much as I can.

I agree with @Gastone that you might not need to retain legal counsel, and that waiting to see what VBA says is probably your best course of action.

And definitely find a new service officer! You need someone you can count on.  The National Association of County Veterans Service Officers provides an easy-to-use Find a Service Officer Tool on their website.Also ask vets in your area if they have a good service officer that you might be able to see. 

Quote

.there was a question on the 7th screenshot top portion asking, "was an opinion requested for the condition (internal VA only)? She answered, Yes! This leads me to think that she had to get another opinion, right?

I don't know. I've never filled out that DBQ. :rolleyes: - Seriously though, I have no idea what the "internal VA only" part means--I've not seen anything like that before. 

Quote

 If the rater is confused, will they get back in contact with her to clarify her statements?

Yes, they should. I would imagine the exam will be returned as "insufficient", with questions for the examiner. You know, something like, "WTF?! Were you on crack when you wrote this?!" :lol:

All the Best @Prettypantha,

~ Mark

Disclaimer: Any suggestions I offer here are based on my experience as a C&P examiner. In addition to asking questions on this board, I recommend that you consult with a veterans service officer, claims agent, or veterans law attorney before making major decisions related to your claim or appeal. 

Mark D Worthen PsyD | Forensic Psychologist | Charlotte, North Carolina | PTSDexams.net (educational site: no ads, no affiliate links)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use