Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

REFRAD number

Rate this question


m5a9c4

Question

I am going through my late husbands c-file and I am trying to make sure I understand everything. 

My question is on his DD214 the transfer of discharge data : Reason and Authority says: Title 10 USC 681 (a) DA Mag 011631z Dec 70 SPN 644 Early Rel fr AD for Warrant Officer aviators.  I looked up 644 and I am really confused on what it means:

644

Voluntary & Involuntary REFRAD - convenience of

government or as specified by Secretary of the Army

Can anyone explain what this means?

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

REFRAD..  Release from Active Duty...   We used to call them "early outs".  If memory serves me correctly, you could request to be released from active duty either 6mos or 3mos prior to your actual discharge date to attend college or in your husbands case, perhaps he wanted to attend to go from enlisted to Warrant Officers?

What rank did your husband get out as?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My husband was a CW2.  I know that he was no fly for about 6 weeks prior to his release due to nervousness.  That is all I can find in his C-file.  So I didn't know if he asked or if they released him.  It may be one of those questions I will never know.  Thanks

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I found your other posts here:

What was the medicine change you mentioned? From what med to what med ,and dosage? How soon before he died was this done.

Do you have his PTSD inhouse records?

I got a call from one of the PTSD vets one night, after talking to my husband by phone and he said he was tired and didn't feel like talking too long.

The vet told me he had what appeared to be a seizure of some sort and the doctor had checked him over.

I called the VA doc the next day and she said he was fine and she had checked his BP and it was OK.

When I finally got the records for her notes and the BP readings (I won a 1151 HBP claim last year for additional malpractice, 20 years after my husband died.)

the notes said" BP is OK".   So much for any actual  medical reading....

I advised getting an IMO for any 1151 claim you might have filed.

His med recs need a thorough review to determine if negligence occurred.

In the prior thread above, was any specific EKG done just prior to the inhouse program?

VA did 2 or 3 EKGS on my husband, over a 6 year period and also an ECHO. They were all abnormal but they never followed up and never told him.

Have you googled " rare unifocal PVCs "yet? Or the potential side affects of any VA meds he was on?

( My husband probably had a diabetic type of seizure. Someone in the inhouse program gave him some pop right away when he had this odd 'seizure'. I proved in 2009 that his 1151 FTCA death was also caused by AO DMII and AO IHD. Since the incident was not documented in his med recs, I didn't use it for any of my 1151 claims.

I only had used an IMO for the DMII claim. No diagnosis and no treatment.

The internet by then (none when I Section 1151ed them and FTCA them) helped me study Endocrinology enough to know I had a very valid DMII claim, and I willingly spent the IMO money ,because I knew Dr Bash would agree with the wealth of evidence of DMII I had found in his VA med recs..

It is a decision we have to make for ourselves.....

If an IMO ,done by someone with expertise in the field of Cardiology ,does not support a 1151 claim, you have spent money , but for Peace of Mind. and that too has value.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use