Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Miss Figured EED?

Rate this question


Buck52

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Questions regarding EED?

Vet gets denied claim for  SC 1997...Refiles claim, 1998 vet gets Service Connected  but 0% .

Now in 2001 vet refiles claim and is increase to 50%...  (from 0% to 50%)  2003 vet files for increase and has C&P  after the c&p...c&p examiner sends VA letter saying this vet should not been S.C. because he never had any of this disability while in service  or any medical records showing documentation he was seen for it while in service.and furthermore vet was given an exit exam  from military service and was consider healthy and not what he is claiming .

 I recommend this Veteran be reduced  at 0%compensation and with draw his Service connection Completely......Sign Dr  xxxxxxx  30 years experienced Medical Dr.

 2003 Vet gets letter of Proposal to Reduce him, vet files NOD Request DRO Hearing at his RO, vet goes to his DRO Hearing  with new &material evidence, and letter  from Private qualified Dr receives a favorable  IMO  & letter from Voc rehab declaring this vet unfeasible to retrain because of his S.C. Disability, vet gets notarized lay statements from family and friends...and Veterans own statement!

DRO Agrees with this Veteran and sees his disability in person, and initiates an expedition and ask VSO to file TDIU Claim for veteran and is awarded an 10% & 60%  increase to his disability  and with a 90%combined increase  using the  CFR Extra scheduler (b)  Vet is Awarded IU with P&T  and no future exams schedule this disability is of chronic and of nature  an increase is warranted and not  decrease  the examiner that proposed a decrease will not be warranted,  veteran has proved his SERVICE CONNECTED Disability  and  it goes on and state what te DRO used as evidence and with a rating specialist at his hearing  it is Obvious this Veterans disability is REAL.

Question  they gave the Vet EED Back to when he filed for increase in 1998 the year he was Service connected? instead from the increase dating back to 2001?

???

After a S.C. is established  don't the EED begin at that date  even if a 0%??

Altho they have is 50% rating at  effective date1998!

...Shouldn't they have went back to 1998  the date the vet was Service Connected?

 

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Buck, we can not answer that question unless we had way more information.  The effective date is the later of the date the doc said you are disabled, or the date you applied.  Since I dont know when the doc said this vet was disabled, I can not answer.  

However...I would treat this as a reduction, and appeal that reduction, since the reduction amounted, apparently, to a later effective date, even with the new disability.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Shouldn't they have went back to 1998  the date the vet was Service Connected?" No

The established medical evidence at that time, per the VA, warranted the "0"

However they might have committed a CUE in 1998 and had enough medical evidence to warrant at least 10% or more.

 Still not enough info here to even guess. We don't know if the "0" was for the same thing they finally awarded the SC for.

" I recommend this Veteran be reduced  at 0%compensation and with draw his Service connection Completely......Sign Dr  xxxxxxx  30 years experienced Medical Dr. " If that is verbatim ,that is an incredible statement even for a VA doctor to make.

Can the veteran join us here and let us see his last decision?

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The EED was giving back to 1999 the year I stopped working because the DRO Quoted 

We gave you an EED The date you fist filed for increase &the year you show to stop working However SS Records  shows I stopped working in 1997 & I stopped working in 1997 because I could no longer work for reasons of my SC Disability  and then I  Filed a claim ...and the EED

was only for the 50%  ok they Adjusted that  and it was around 10.000 at the time  but should that went back to the date Service Connection was established?

on my healthvet they showed I was 50%in 1998...I never got paid for that  and they only went back to 1999  as for as I can til.

Now they took that off my healthvet...I was going to print it off but waited to late and now that is not showing up in my healthvet.

I did take a screen shot and sent to Asknod to look at.  but we all know the VA makes errors and could have been a typo on there part.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Buck if the whole search page comes up, the hadit links here  should answer your questions:

http://community.hadit.com/search/?type=all&q=Date+eNTITLEMENT+aROSE+ssdi

I think I used my husband's example there...If not...he had a claim in process for higher rating of his 30% PTSD.1994.And a Section 1151 claim.

He applied for SSDI. Early 1993. They awarded first for the 1151 stroke but I prepared reconsideration because they (SSDI) didn't consider his PTSD. I found a regulation in their SSA manual that said they were supposed to consider all disabilities.He died with 2 claims pending. When VA finally got his PTSD SSDI award ,because it was dated during the same year he had filed for higher SC rating, they (VA) gave him, a very favorable EED of 1991, the same date of the SSDI PTSD award.The award came in 1997. 100% P & T for SC PTSD. He had been dead by then for 3 years.

He never even knew the 1151 claim he filed had not only been won but that I filed FTCA as well.

The "Date Entitlement Arose " is what Broncovet means. The posts I made in the search link are more detailed.

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Ms Berta

the Veteran is me  and this was for my Military as Noise Ind used Hearing loss  and it has got so profound  it keeps me from doing my job I was trained to do after 25 years or so.

I believe you and Flip help me with this claim back then here on Hadit...Flip and I corresponded by email back then and he talk with my spouse on the phone.

Flip was the one that mention they messed up big time on the EED...ABOUT 18.000.00 Worth...but I was so happy I won the claim I forgot to submit the NOD...as Flip was upset pretty good that I choose a DAV SO to go with me to my DRO Hearing...if I had known now what I didn't know back then  things would be a lot different.

Flip is enjoying his life now and got off Hadit...I hate to ask him for his help...I have my C-file on order...This has nothing to do with my recent PTSD Claim.

altho they did give me SMC S1  H,B. and  rating at 100%

I can't do anything until I get my C-FILE  and even then some of my records of this  may  may not not be  be there...since they took off that 1998 50% rating on myhealthvet.

 

.............Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

forgot to suggest...you can ask them for an Audit.

Then again they make a lot of audit errors.

I got an audit after Regional Counsel Cued them on a claim I had that they refused to apply the proper regs to.

In the audit however, it revealed that although they had to pay me 28 thousand, they forgot somehow an  additional 11 thousand too. 

I sent them my handwritten calculations and they fixed that error very fast. They didn't want the Regional Counsel calling another CUE on them.

Audits are deceiving because they look like the were done right.

I have personally experienced however that VA does not know how to add,subtract, multiply ,or divide, in addition to being unable to read.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use