Vet gets denied claim for SC 1997...Refiles claim, 1998 vet gets Service Connected but 0% .
Now in 2001 vet refiles claim and is increase to 50%... (from 0% to 50%) 2003 vet files for increase and has C&P after the c&p...c&p examiner sends VA letter saying this vet should not been S.C. because he never had any of this disability while in service or any medical records showing documentation he was seen for it while in service.and furthermore vet was given an exit exam from military service and was consider healthy and not what he is claiming .
I recommend this Veteran be reduced at 0%compensation and with draw his Service connection Completely......Sign Dr xxxxxxx 30 years experienced Medical Dr.
2003 Vet gets letter of Proposal to Reduce him, vet files NOD Request DRO Hearing at his RO, vet goes to his DRO Hearing with new &material evidence, and letter from Private qualified Dr receives a favorable IMO & letter from Voc rehab declaring this vet unfeasible to retrain because of his S.C. Disability, vet gets notarized lay statements from family and friends...and Veterans own statement!
DRO Agrees with this Veteran and sees his disability in person, and initiates an expedition and ask VSO to file TDIU Claim for veteran and is awarded an 10% & 60% increase to his disability and with a 90%combined increase using the CFR Extra scheduler (b) Vet is Awarded IU with P&T and no future exams schedule this disability is of chronic and of nature an increase is warranted and not decrease the examiner that proposed a decrease will not be warranted, veteran has proved his SERVICE CONNECTED Disability and it goes on and state what te DRO used as evidence and with a rating specialist at his hearing it is Obvious this Veterans disability is REAL.
Question they gave the Vet EED Back to when he filed for increase in 1998 the year he was Service connected? instead from the increase dating back to 2001?
???
After a S.C. is established don't the EED begin at that date even if a 0%??
Altho they have is 50% rating at effective date1998!
...Shouldn't they have went back to 1998 the date the vet was Service Connected?
Edited by Buck52
I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
Question
Buck52
Questions regarding EED?
Vet gets denied claim for SC 1997...Refiles claim, 1998 vet gets Service Connected but 0% .
Now in 2001 vet refiles claim and is increase to 50%... (from 0% to 50%) 2003 vet files for increase and has C&P after the c&p...c&p examiner sends VA letter saying this vet should not been S.C. because he never had any of this disability while in service or any medical records showing documentation he was seen for it while in service.and furthermore vet was given an exit exam from military service and was consider healthy and not what he is claiming .
I recommend this Veteran be reduced at 0%compensation and with draw his Service connection Completely......Sign Dr xxxxxxx 30 years experienced Medical Dr.
2003 Vet gets letter of Proposal to Reduce him, vet files NOD Request DRO Hearing at his RO, vet goes to his DRO Hearing with new &material evidence, and letter from Private qualified Dr receives a favorable IMO & letter from Voc rehab declaring this vet unfeasible to retrain because of his S.C. Disability, vet gets notarized lay statements from family and friends...and Veterans own statement!
DRO Agrees with this Veteran and sees his disability in person, and initiates an expedition and ask VSO to file TDIU Claim for veteran and is awarded an 10% & 60% increase to his disability and with a 90%combined increase using the CFR Extra scheduler (b) Vet is Awarded IU with P&T and no future exams schedule this disability is of chronic and of nature an increase is warranted and not decrease the examiner that proposed a decrease will not be warranted, veteran has proved his SERVICE CONNECTED Disability and it goes on and state what te DRO used as evidence and with a rating specialist at his hearing it is Obvious this Veterans disability is REAL.
Question they gave the Vet EED Back to when he filed for increase in 1998 the year he was Service connected? instead from the increase dating back to 2001?
???
After a S.C. is established don't the EED begin at that date even if a 0%??
Altho they have is 50% rating at effective date1998!
...Shouldn't they have went back to 1998 the date the vet was Service Connected?
I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
3
1
Popular Days
May 30
8
Top Posters For This Question
Buck52 4 posts
Berta 3 posts
broncovet 1 post
Popular Days
May 30 2016
8 posts
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now