Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sec to provide TBI Releif

Rate this question


Buck52

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hot off the Grill

http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=2795

............................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yeah Great...in part:

"Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert McDonald has granted equitable relief to more than 24,000 Veterans following a national review of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) medical examinations conducted in connection with disability compensation claims processed between 2007 and 2015.

This action by the Secretary allows the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to offer new TBI examinations to Veterans whose initial examination for TBI was not conducted by one of four designated medical specialists and provides them with the opportunity to have their claims reprocessed. Equitable relief is a unique legal remedy that allows the Secretary to correct an injustice to a claimant where VA is not otherwise authorized to do so within the scope of the law."

We have TBI vets here,....I hope they get something from the VA advising them on this, if they had TBI exams done by non specialists.

The PR seems to indicate VA has already determined who those 24,000 TBI  vets might be.

Don't forget VA was supposed to identify thousands of potential Nehmer Footnote one claimants in 2010 and give the names of those veterans to NVLSP .Chuck and I were among many Nehmer claimants who were never put on that list.

If a vet thinks their TBI was rated improperly , hopefully they have appealed that already. And hopefully VA will contact them if a new C & P is needed.

I find it difficult to believe that there are vets who apparently did get a specialist's TBI C & P.

Unless the 24,000 is, in fact, every single vet who had a TBI C & P.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hey, I fit into this category, unfortunately, I'm still in the middle of the process of having it SC'ed.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice.

You're never out of the fight.

Semper Fidelis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

More info here:

http://www.disabledveterans.org/2016/05/05/veterans-affairs-tbi-scandal-affected-25000-veterans/

The C & P exam must be done by one of the 4 types of professionals listed in the link.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Fox News TV is running this story as the latest VA Scandal....I missed it this AM, but hope to catch up on it. 

Any time a C & P is done by someone not qualified to do it ( as in the TBI situation) vets MUST fight for a better exam,

because the C & P exam is primarily what the RO uses to justify their denials.

 24,000( and in some news stories  almost 25,000) TBI vets who might need a re-do C & P by someone who is qualified....this is a disgrace because TBI was touted as the Signature Wound of the Iraq War and yet the VA  

has been, so far, deficient in properly assessing it, to the detriment of TBI veterans.

I still cannot comprehend why the so called vet orgs did not aggressively fight over the fact that VA owns QTC C & P exams until a decision is made on the claim.

This lack of rights to 'discovery' as found in civil courts of law, makes sure that vets have very little time left to fight the results in response to a SOC or even time to obtain an IMO doctor, and that means, if no rebuttal to the SOC changes their mind, and no DRO review or hearing is requested,

the claim will probably  be in lala land for many more years.

 I wonder how many tens of thousands of veterans never got a valid C & P exam done in the first place,in addition to the TBI vets.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I believe I was one of the first 300 that was discovered from the Minneapolis VAMC when our local station, Kare 11, started to investigate proper examiners and doctor's license and certifications in early 2015. I also believe the VA was well aware of the situation but was waiting for it to eventually hit the fan to actually do anything.

Please see my previous post "TBI Re-examination?" for details. I was one of the lucky 50/300 that was actually service connected for TBI amongst other things. There is a pending Administrative Review open for my original date of claim and per eBenefits my current estimated date of completion has been pushed out to 10/16/19.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yeah this TBI  fiasco is a disgrace.

VA decided ,in 2010 ,that only VAMH professionals can dx PTSD yet failed to provide the proper professionals for TBI vets.

"There is a pending Administrative Review open for my original date of claim and per eBenefits my current estimated date of completion has been pushed out to 10/16/19."

10/16/19 is a Disgrace too!

"I also believe the VA was well aware of the situation but was waiting for it to eventually hit the fan to actually do anything. " 

That statement is applicable to just about every scandal the VA has had so far.

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use