I have been Service Connected at 60% for chronic fatigue syndrome for more than 20 years. I have started the process of filing a claim for unemployability. During that process, I looked at my rated disabilities in ebenefits and found that it is noted as Systemic condition - general, 60% service connected with an effective date of 1999. My BVA decision was written in 1998 and the effective date of my rating was back to 1994. I talked to a Service Officer and they said they didn't know why it was listed in the system like this, but as long as I had my decision I should ignore it. My concern was, and is, that it shows the wrong date and that difference means the difference between a protected rating and a non-protected rating.
I called VA and they set up an inquiry and I would be notified in a few weeks. Tonight, I looked at ebenefits and found that the systemic line and effective date have not changed, but now I have 2 other disabilities listed as not service connected. Not only that, but I never applied for any other disability rating other than Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and to my knowledge I don't have these other disabilities. The first is Brain disease due to trauma and the other is a Brain or spinal cord condition - general. I have no idea where they came up with this. Both state under decision that they are not service connected.
My concern is that these two items could have a negative impact on my unemployability claim. I am not sure what to do about any of it. When I spoke to the person on the phone a few weeks ago, they said they would send me a letter with regard to their decision. Maybe it is on its way and they can explain this to me.
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
Question
Penelope
I have been Service Connected at 60% for chronic fatigue syndrome for more than 20 years. I have started the process of filing a claim for unemployability. During that process, I looked at my rated disabilities in ebenefits and found that it is noted as Systemic condition - general, 60% service connected with an effective date of 1999. My BVA decision was written in 1998 and the effective date of my rating was back to 1994. I talked to a Service Officer and they said they didn't know why it was listed in the system like this, but as long as I had my decision I should ignore it. My concern was, and is, that it shows the wrong date and that difference means the difference between a protected rating and a non-protected rating.
I called VA and they set up an inquiry and I would be notified in a few weeks. Tonight, I looked at ebenefits and found that the systemic line and effective date have not changed, but now I have 2 other disabilities listed as not service connected. Not only that, but I never applied for any other disability rating other than Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and to my knowledge I don't have these other disabilities. The first is Brain disease due to trauma and the other is a Brain or spinal cord condition - general. I have no idea where they came up with this. Both state under decision that they are not service connected.
My concern is that these two items could have a negative impact on my unemployability claim. I am not sure what to do about any of it. When I spoke to the person on the phone a few weeks ago, they said they would send me a letter with regard to their decision. Maybe it is on its way and they can explain this to me.
Your thoughts on what to do would be appreciated.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
5
4
1
Popular Days
Jun 8
10
Top Posters For This Question
Penelope 5 posts
Buck52 4 posts
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
Jun 8 2016
10 posts
Popular Posts
Berta
VA recently had to review over 24,000 claims regarding TBI ( Brain injury due to trauma in service). Have you ever claimed any type of head trauma in or after service? They might have mixed
Buck52
yes it should be..you are already SC so now its just a matter of them reading your medical evidence & pulling your SS Records to see when you last paid income tax go back to 2012 for your re
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now