Jump to content
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
commodog

VA Admits in service treatment but denies connection?

Question

Hey guys. Thanks in advance for reading this!

So this is what I received today for my sleep apnea claim (See Attached)

So they acknowledge I had sleep apnea in service.
Then deny my current sleep apnea is associated with me having sleep apnea in the past?
For the record, the words "sleep apnea" were never used with me while in-service.
They just told me I must not be getting sufficient sleep.

It wasn't even clear to me until my current doctor submitted me for a sleep study that that is what they were talking about back in 2004-2005.

So like, two totally different sleep apneas?

The VA is weird as hell sometimes...

Going to go ahead and NOD this, but what do you guys think needs to be included to succeed?
How is it that they can admit I had sleep apnea treatment in service, but then deny sleep apnea because I tried to "warrior my way back into society"?

Also, for your consideration, I am...:

...70% PTSD
...10% TBI (Vehicular fall down a friggin cliff during the invasion)
...10% Tinnitus

Thanks!
 

13500005_1207792649231821_1799970713_o (1).jpg

Edited by commodog
Inclusion of pertinent information

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Three factors needed for direct SC:

1. Event/diagnosis while in the service
2. Current diagnosis
3. Doctor's opinion connection #1 and #2

Looks like the VA admits you have #1 and #2, but the C&P doctor denied #3 per the explanation:

"We did not find a link between your medical condition and military service"

"Per your VA exam, the examiner opined that your current sleep apnea is less likely than not...

 

Get your C&P exam results and confirm that this is actually what the doctor opined. It is not unusual for the VARO to fail to properly read a C&P exam. It has happened to me more than once.

It is also worth it to find out the title of the C&P examiner. If they are a nurse practitioner, request another exam or get your own doc to provide their opinion (see below).

The best way to overcome a "less likely than not" is to get your treating physician to opine "as likely as not", "more likely than not", or "is due to".

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

Hey, thanks Vync!

I will do just that.
The doctor, in the C&P, told me, and I quote, "I am putting it down that you first showed these symptoms in 2003."
Then he showed me a field on the computer screen that said something, and he put "2003" into it.

I am really weirded out by the response I got.

I will petition for my C&P exam results.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
23 hours ago, commodog said:

Hey, thanks Vync!

I will do just that.
The doctor, in the C&P, told me, and I quote, "I am putting it down that you first showed these symptoms in 2003."
Then he showed me a field on the computer screen that said something, and he put "2003" into it.

I am really weirded out by the response I got.

I will petition for my C&P exam results.

Thanks!

I hope you are able to find something positive from your results.

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I agree.  Get an IME/IMO from a specialist or your current doctor connecting past, present and future.

Then do a FOIA request for the C&P examiner's curriculum vitae to use if he/she is a nurse practitioner or physcian's assistant, when comparing to your MD in a NOD and/or BVA appeal.

Good luck!

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 6/20/2016 at 11:07 AM, commodog said:


...70% PTSD
...10% TBI (Vehicular fall down a friggin cliff during the invasion)
...10% Tinnitus

Thanks!
 

13500005_1207792649231821_1799970713_o (1).jpg

You several options.... You only need to show connected consistent symptomology to the current sleep apnea.  Not treatment.  The BVA has ruled many times that "the Veteran is capable" of and relaying his or her own symptoms.  You can simply put a statement with your appeal.

Also consider secondary service connection "caused or aggravated" for TBI, PTSD, and Tinnitus.

I would recommend Dr. Anaise or Dr. Ellis for IME/IMO... Dr. Anaise has a record of connecting PTSD to Sleep Apnea.

Here is a case of an IMO connection Sleep APnea to PTSD (from Dr. Anaise's website):

The usefulness of IMO Letters to establish rating for sleep apnea secondary to PTSD 

In a recent decision by the BVA (FEB 2 8 2014 DOCKET NO. 11-09 193) the board reiterated the importance of IMO Letters supported by medical literature in establishing service-connected disability for sleep apnea secondary to PTSD the board held: “The Veteran had a VA examination in October 2009. The Veteran reported sleep apnea with an onset two to three months earlier. The VA examiner opined that, per medical literature review, sleep apnea is not caused by or aggravated by the Veteran’s PTSD. The VA examiner stated that the basis of the opinion was the review of medical literature. The literature was not specified. At the Board hearing in March 2012, the Veteran testified that his therapist has told him that PTSD aggravates sleep apnea because he has nightmares and dreams in his sleep. The Veteran testified that he has anxiety attacks in his sleep that keep him from catching his breath. The Veteran testified that he has used a CPAP machine for about four years. In this case, there is positive medical evidence which links the Veteran’s current sleep apnea to service-connected PTSD via aggravation. The most probative opinion is that of Dr. T which not only provided a link between the Veteran’s PTSD and sleep apnea (by aggravation) but also was supported by submitted medical literature. Despite the negative VA opinion, in light of the positive medical opinions from the private psychologist, the Board finds the evidence is at least in equipoise regarding whether the Veteran’s sleep apnea is aggravated by service- connected PTSD. Accordingly, resolving all reasonable doubt in the Veteran’s favor, service connection for sleep apnea is warranted. – Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990); 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b). ORDER Secondary servi

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • Military Service Records - Military personnel records can include DD 214s/Separation Documents, service personnel records found within the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), and medical Records. Military personnel records can be used for proving military service or as a valuable tool in genealogical research.
      • 0 replies
    • So I've been in a basic power chair (Q6 Edge) since 2015. Late 2016 was also fitted for a TiLite TRA manual (also keeping powerchair). 2017 was approved by Tampa VA for clothing allowance for lower. 

       

      Moved to Battle Creek VA late 2017. Since then was issued new basic powerchair (Quickie P222-SE) to replace broken Q6. Still use TiLite also now can lightly ambulate with Forearm crutches.

      Use crutches 50%, and both chairs 25% each.

      Was approved for 1 clothing allowance this year for forearms crutches for upper.

       

      Was denied 2nd for chair/lower that was awarded last year because Chief Prosthetic states "powerchair takes precedence, you were issued that so you are to use only the powerchair".

      Also powerchair has gap between seat and leg mounts where clothes do get caught and tear. Clinician was I'll put it back in but"power chairs dont get clothing allowances", and "any review or appeal will only come back to me"

      I was approved for powerchair/custom manual combo clothing allowance last year; How do I word an appeal for the lower clothing allowance this year?

      My local DAV rep at the VA has no clue on how to handle this.

       
      • 6 replies
    • Thank you.  I’m not exactly sure of how I will file it.  If it is secondary to TBI, would it be pyramiding?
    • I understand what you are saying. Does it sometimes take awhile to update the VA letters and disabilities info online after it closes.....in my case on a Saturday ? Some on other posts on here says no and some say yes so I'm just curious about the inconsistency regarding that if it is yes and no.
    • I understand what you are saying. Does it sometimes take awhile to update the VA letters and disabilities info online after it closes.....in my case on a Saturday ? Some on other posts on here says no and some say yes so I'm just curious about the inconsistency regarding that if it is yes and no.
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines