Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Advice--Can a Vet file a New Claim While an NOD is submitted

Rate this question


rootbeer22

Question

Vets:

I submitted and am processing an NOD for my first claim. Also, can I file a new claim for a new contention while I have an NOD Pending or does everything stop while the NOD is being processed for the DRO that I asked for ?  I know that the DRO review is going to take one to two years? Also. If I file multiple NODs, for multiple claims will the VA consolidate the NODs into one single NOD?

Thanks in Advance, Rootbeer22

Edited by rootbeer22
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Short answer is yes and they should combine all NOD's into one. This can give you a second RO shot at your claim. You need to ask for a formal hearing on your NOD's. This hearing should be by  a different DRO then the one that did a DRO hearing. Most lawyers like to keep the claim at the RO as this give you more bite's at the claim. At any DRO hearing, ask for an informal hearing and ask for all pending issues to be combined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

They combine recently filed claims into one but NODs are a different story.

Based strictly on my personal experience, NOD requesting a DRO Hearing Filed early 2010, 11th hr of the 11th month, just a little procrastination.

At that point, I got serious about handling my own claims, no more relying on VSOs. Filed New Claims in 11, 12, another NOD DRO Filed for IU Denial end of 12. 1 New FDC filed end of 13, 1 FDC filed mid 14. DRO Hearing from 10 held 06/29/14. Opted for an "Informal Hearing," DRO not only awarded issues from 10 but said due to having the "Informal Hearing," he was able to address my 12 IU NOD, Awarded that also. The DRO said the IU NOD was not on deck to be heard, had I gone with the Official Hearing format, Recorded & Transcribed, I would have had to wait for another DRO Hearing date.

The other pending FDC's were Awarded separately, end of 14, mid 15 and mid 12/15. Some might say, filing the additional claims caused the  4.25 yr wait for the DRO Hearing. As far as I'm concerned, going from 10% with DRO pending 2010, to 90% with "IU Inferred," as of 2011, was direct result of my filing New Claims immediately as New DX's presented.

In the VA Claims Appeals scheme of things, 4 years is kind of "Middle of the Road" as to wait time.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gastone:

 

thanks so so much for the reply..I'm trying to figure out all of this stuff out on my way from 90 to 100%. I worked hard to get to 90% within a short period of time. I was low-balled and not service connected on several issues. But, I think the NOD could get me there. That said, I've been encourage to file for my hypogonadism which is on the extreme side and based upon the explosion that I was involved with. I think my doctor is going to sign off on the DBQ? I recently found a Hadith.com post in which a Vet was granted a high percentage for it. There's a lot of new medical science on the effects of the brain and pituitary gland for soldiers involved with traumatic explosions. So, I believe that that contention could clearly put me over the top but I have the NOD pending now. I was recently service connected for TBI but the doc did not add in the hypogonadism along with that. I guess, I could either add it to the NOD or have a fresh claim just for the hypogonadism. So, I'm trying to figure out the best strategy for this. I think a new claim for hypogonadism would move much faster than the NOD based upon the current timelines?

Godspeed Rootbeer22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use