Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Cardiac Hypertrophy

Rate this question


Question

Posted (edited)

Ok,

So, my DBQ for heart disease says, "evidence of cardiac hypertrophy", "yes".

DBQ medical opinion,

a. least as likely as not, 50% greater, etc., resulted from a service connected condition (hypertension), so a win I believe.

c. Rationale, documented left ventricular enlargement.

From what I read in the rating scale, most of the heart disease codes call for 30% for cardiac hypertrophy,

My METs are/is to high (12.7), but the paragraphs state "or", so should I get the 30%??

 

Workload of greater than 5 METs but not greater than 7 METs results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope, or; evidence of

cardiac hypertrophy or dilatation on electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, or X-ray................................................................................... 30 

 

What are your thoughts?

Hamslice


 
Edited by Hamslice
spelling

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator
Posted (edited)

Cardiac hypertrophy is a diagnosis, 12.7 mets would probably be evidence.  What are your symptoms?  

Thats what they rate on ...symptoms, not diagnosis.  If its asymptomatic, then its likely 0%.  Does the thickeing of your heart cause shortness of breath?  Pain?  Something else?  

Or, maybe like you said, its entirely on mets.  Some VA stuff is weird, such as sleep apnea...its you either wear a cpap or not, once service connected.  I guess they presume the doc wont be prescribing a cpap if you have no symptoms.  

Edited by broncovet
  • 0
Posted

Symptoms aside, the reg says 30% for evidence of Cardiac hypertrophy, and my DBQ say yes, for that question.

My only concern is my METS is too high a number for 30% (5-7 METS) and mine is 12.7.

But the reg for 30% says, 5-7 METS OR Cardiac hyopertrophy.  Just wondering how the VA interprits OR.

My symptoms as reported in the DBQ;

Veteran served in the Army from 1999 to 2008, and was in Iraq from 2003 to 2004. States that he was found to have an elevated blood pressure during a routine examination in 6/2004 when he came back from Iraq, and several other times after that. Reports that he was diagnosed with hypertension in 2008, and started on medication. States he was told in 1999 that he had an abnormal EKG that showed possible left ventricular enlargement. In 9/2015 he was having episodes of chest pain, and went to a cardiologist for a cardiac workup. States that he had an echocardiogram that showed he did have left ventricular hypertrophy

Also from the DBQ;

a. Is there evidence of cardiac hypertrophy? [X] Yes [ ] No

If yes, indicate how this condition was documented:

[ ] EKG [ ] Chest x-ray [X] Echocardiogram

Date of test: 6/22/2016

 

So, the question of the day is, what does OR mean??

Thanks for the imput,

Hamslice

 

 

 

 

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use