Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

C & P Docs

Rate this question


Question

Posted

If we get the right to choose to have a lawyer (S 2694) from pending legislation in Congress-for VA claims-

wouldn't a good lawyer find that VA- paid C & P doctors are in a conflict of interest when they perform a C & P?

Although many C & Ps are fair and impartial- some of them- in my opinion- reveal down right negligence because they are so far off the mark.

If a C & P doctor misrepresents a disabilty as to it's disabling degree ,I consider that to be medical error.

Then again- lawyers-----

I have a very good friend who is a lawyer and asked me to help him with his VA claim.

He doesn't want comp -he is just hoping to get some help with his medication costs.

His claim is for heart disease due to service-

Vietnam Vet, 2 PHs, Vietnam service-

He gave me only a few SMrs because he did not understand the significance of them.I could not find anything yet in them to help the heart claim-

Also he gets private PTSD therapy but doesn't want the VA or anyone to know he has PTSD.

The PHs would give him 50% I am sure-and he told me of a major additional stressor and this would give him some med cost help I think-not sure-he did not want to pursue PTSD claim at all-

However-my point is - he is a great lawyer-civil and criminal-

But it took me quite some time to explain to him a little bit of VA claims 101-

If we do get the right to have lawyers-it might take them time to get up on he VA claims process-

I imagine that some will specialize in VA claims and advertise on this basis right away.

I wonder if those who handle CAVC cases will also be able to represent vets at the VARO level.

And I sure would hope that if we get the right to hire lawyers, they will recognize the arbitrary and capricious way our claims are often handled.

VA is the Judge, and the Jury.

They "weigh" evidence on their own scale.If they even read it at all.

I cannot imagine a good lawyer putting up with some of their tactics.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Posted

Berta I agree it would take lawyers awhile to handle va cases.

I bought some furnisher in July of 2005. I wrote a check for $5600.00, and the furniture was suppose to be delivered in three weeks. After weekly calls for three months, I finally turned it over to a Lawyer. In the suit I made him include mental anguish. He said we were waisting our time because the wu supreme had ruled on a case not long ago that it would be hard to proove. He relunctantly included it in the suit. At my deposintion from their lawyer they also said this wouldn't fly. I insisted it would because I suffered from ptsd, and it worsened my condition. They wanted to settle by giving My money back. I told them to stick it where the sun didnt shine, and demanded a trial by jury.

Neither My Lawyer or the Big law firm that handled the furniture companies side had ever heard of ptsd. I guantee when I threw my file on the table it got some attention. It took a year from the time of purchase to a court date. Up to this point they had only used a jr. Lawyer in their defense, but I'm here to tell you on trial day they bought their big guns out. Three in fact, My Wife was really nervous and so was My Lawyer, but I just set there and grin at them. I wanted a trial by jury because thats the only way I could claim punitive damages, And brother did I have a number ready for them when it got to that point.

Just before jury selection began their Lawyer requested a delay, and the Judge agreed to allow it. Within a few days they made us an offer, but by this time I wanted the fight. The offer they made was a tidy sum.,and My Lawyer wanted to take it. Needless to say I was irate. Because I knew I was going to win this case and I wanted punitive damages.

After a few days when I could think straight again I realized How much this was affecting My Wife and decided to take the settlment.

I guess My point is I agree It would take Lawyers awhile but they would educate themselves in va law after a while especially when they started seeing the dollar signs. And by the way if it does become law and I need a Lawyer. I would go to my opposing council as I am sure they have a head start on ptsd (at least)HEE HEE.

KKP

Posted

VERY interesting-I can relate to that-

I could not find a lawyer in the 1990s who believed in my wrongful death-VA case.

So I pursued it myself.

I didnt have to share any of it with any lawyer when I settled.He He.

When the local legal community found out some lawyers came up to me in the local law library to congrat me-even the DAV lawyer did too (when I sued my NSO)and told me to get a law license and join the bar.I think anyone who can pass the bar exam can practice law in NY without attending law school-

I love lawyers but sometimes they do not really see the point of some legal actions.

Long ago- I saw a man on TV who had filed a racial discrimination suit against his employer. No lawyer would help him. He studied the laws himself-

and he won. That man inspired me.

We won the first ADA case in NY without a lawyer and also a large retro from SSA which a SSA lawyer refused to handle as he saw no merit in it.

I got an illegal ticket once and went to traffic court and had evidence to show that the police department had discriminated against me.

When the bailiff asked how I pled I rattled off all this and said I was not guilty.

It was so funny- a bunch of lawyers in the front row suddenly all turned around and looked at me in astonishment-

A cop came over to me and asked me to follow him out of the court room.

He showed my evidence to another bunch of cops and then they went to see the Chief.

5 minutes later he came back and said the ticket had been destroyed.

We would still have to be cautious in hiring a lawyer to represent us with a VA claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Posted

I don't doubt a thing you've said.

I have fought two major battles, one with ssa, and one with workers comp. I hired a lawyer who filed my legal stuff but in all honesty I did all the leg work. I won both.

Proably the worst thing the va can do is low ball a vet. I know some dont have the resources, in various ways. But some old crippled up vets that still have their minds can be more lethal to the va than a Squad of Green Berets were to charlie.

GO TEAM

KKP

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted
If we get the right to choose to have a lawyer (S 2694) from pending legislation in Congress-for VA claims-

wouldn't a good lawyer find that VA- paid C & P doctors are in a conflict of interest when they perform a C & P?

Although many C & Ps are fair and impartial- some of them- in my opinion- reveal down right negligence because they are so far off the mark.

If a C & P doctor misrepresents a disabilty as to it's disabling degree ,I consider that to be medical error.

Then again- lawyers-----

I have a very good friend who is a lawyer and asked me to help him with his VA claim.

He doesn't want comp -he is just hoping to get some help with his medication costs.

His claim is for heart disease due to service-

Vietnam Vet, 2 PHs, Vietnam service-

He gave me only a few SMrs because he did not understand the significance of them.I could not find anything yet in them to help the heart claim-

Also he gets private PTSD therapy but doesn't want the VA or anyone to know he has PTSD.

The PHs would give him 50% I am sure-and he told me of a major additional stressor and this would give him some med cost help I think-not sure-he did not want to pursue PTSD claim at all-

However-my point is - he is a great lawyer-civil and criminal-

But it took me quite some time to explain to him a little bit of VA claims 101-

If we do get the right to have lawyers-it might take them time to get up on he VA claims process-

I imagine that some will specialize in VA claims and advertise on this basis right away.

I wonder if those who handle CAVC cases will also be able to represent vets at the VARO level.

And I sure would hope that if we get the right to hire lawyers, they will recognize the arbitrary and capricious way our claims are often handled.

VA is the Judge, and the Jury.

They "weigh" evidence on their own scale.If they even read it at all.

I cannot imagine a good lawyer putting up with some of their tactics.

You wrote - "The PHs would give him 50% I am sure"

Where do you get this? Is it based on his physical injuries? Or due to the psychological trauma? And if the psychological trauma, where does that equate to percentage awarded? The PH's confirm the stressor but in no way equate to how the PTSD effects his daily life. Please explain.

pr

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Berta

I think that a good lawyer who would do claims for vets in the case of dealing with C&P doctors would have his own doctors he uses to refute the results of C&P exams. This is what workers compensation and SSA lawyers do. The State or SSA has their prostitute doctors who grind out opinions and the lawyers have their expert doctors who know how to write reports. Hopefully, vets will find lawyers who are able to fight bad C&P exams with their own experts.

I would like to find a lawyer who could represent or advise me on CUE. I would pay just to know if I have a good case worth fighting about for the next 2-5 years. I feel quite certain my CUE will be denied at the RO level but that is where I had to file it. If I could find a lawyer to help me craft a really good appeal to the BVA that would be excellent. This is a CUE that goes back more than 30 years. Just getting it bumped up from 10 to 30 percent would be a nice chunk of money. It may be wishful thinking but you don't know until you try. I could file the generic NOD and the lawyer could take it from there if it was worth it.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use