Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Preparation for Decision without C&P appt

Rate this question


Question

Posted

Question here, I had a claim in for bilateral bursitis(knees) and subluxation in left knee. This claim was initially denied because they said that I did not have a diagnosis for bursitis in my medical records. I have since then informed my doc of the apparent oversight as she has indeed been treating me for bursitis, however she stated "knee pain" in my record. Now, I have resubmitted my claim, and I also provided them my doc medical notes from my records which states the bursitis diagnosis, as well as medical record notes from an Orthopaedic doc siting the same as well as siting subluxation, and I also submitted the medical notes from my Physical Therapist. I also included a statement from my wife explaining how these issues have affected my daily activity. I look on ebenefits today, and my claim has moved from Gather Evidence straight to Preparation for Decision. Question, how can be preparing for decision when I have not been scheduled for a C&P exam yet? I mean, I know that I submitted a lot of evidence and all,,, but shouldn't they send me in for an exam?? Does this mean I'm on the brink of denial??

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator
Posted

No, it does not mean you are on the brink of a denial.  It means that C and P exams are discretionary, that VA may or may not provide a c and p exam.  It could mean you have enough evidence without a c and p exam to go ahead.  

I telll Vets this all the time, but we have Vets that try to show off their knowledge and it usually backfires.  You dont need to apply for "bursitis" of the knee.  Instead, apply for disabilities of the knee.  You probably dont know the difference between bursitis, arthritis, or some of the other knee disorders...you should let the doctor diagnose and treat you.  

When you apply for "bursitis" this suggests you are excluding symptoms of say, arthritis.  Maybe you have both..one in the patella-femoral jointt and another in the femoral tibia joint.  Just say your knee hurts and let the doc decide if its arthritis, bursitis, or something else, such as a torn ligament.  

  • 0
Posted

Now that is very good and sound advice and it makes all the sense in the world to me! But when my claim was denied the 1st time, it stated " knee pain is not a diagnosis and just pain alone doesn't qualify for c&p". Which I thought was odd because I know people that has been approved for "chronic back pain ".Weird....

  • 0
Posted

I also moved from Gathering of Evidence to Prep for Decision without a C&P, and I also have thorough treatment records from the VA and an IMO in favor of an increase. But I also wondered the same about if I was on fast track for denial...from what I understand they can still order you a C&P at this stage and move you back to Gathering of Evidence and it's not uncommon. Who knows. But yeah, like broncovet says, let them dx you. I'm hoping for the best but preparing for the worst. Good luck to you.

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator
Posted (edited)

Hopefully, you appealed the decision that stated "knee pain is not a diagnosis".  The court has ruled the Veteran can "identify the benefit sought" by pointing to the applicable body part.  There is no requirement that Veterans have an intimate knowledge of anatomy or medical diagnosis in order to receive benefits.   That is why they have doctors and c and P exams.   Not all Vets can even read.   The Veteran need not understand, nor be able to name the applicable joint to get benefits.   

 

Edited by broncovet
  • 0
Posted

Thanks broncovet for posting your last comment because it hits on one of contentions I am appealing..

  • 0
Posted

I file a claim for bilateral hip condition ( arthritis) and they didn't order a c and p exam.  I'm waiting to see the outcome of the claim, I feel it's in my favor because I sent in all the evidence showing I have arthritis of the hips.  This claim is secondary to an already SC condition.  Good Luck Gunny Motto!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use