I have several threads going but i want to get these C&P exams out there in the open. Please look at both C&P exams (Foot Conditions) (Ankle Conditions). Look at the errors done by ONE doctor.
The first C&P exam I attached is for Foot Misc. The very first error by the C&P examiner is the fact that he states under #1 Diagnoses Avulsion Fracture 5th Metatarsal - date of diagnoses 6/23/2013. That is WRONG! If you look at the other C&P Exam for Ankles, under #1 Diagnoses he states right 5th metatarsal fracture - date of diagnoses 1993! YES that is right! See where I am going with this????
Let's continue on....
C&P exam for Foot Misc -#2 Medical History - he specifically states Toe condition left toe. The date of the symptoms 1991.
#3 Morton's Neuroma - YES left.
#15 Functional Impact - YES
#16 Remarks - For the claimant's claimed of RIGHT FOOT CONDITION, there is no diagnoses because the claimant does not claim the condition. For the claimant condition LEFT FOOT CONDITION, the diagnosis is already noted in the diagnosis section. For the claimants condition of TOE CONDITION ON LEFT FOOT, the diagnosis is already noted in the diagnosis section.
He is obviously mistaken on my right foot condition because it was in my original claim May 2013 but let's continue....
C&P exam for Ankles - #1 Diagnosis - He notes ankle sprain 1993 and he notes right 5th metatarsal fracture 1993 BUT he puts it as LEFT foot! WTF????? Do you see this??? First he has the right fracture on my foot C&P exam with the wrong date, then on this one he has the right fracture but noted on the left foot!
#2 Medical History: States my history
#17 Functional Impact - YES
#18 Remarks - The claimant now has or has had ankle condition. For the claimants claimed condition of RIGHT ANKLE CONDITION, the diagnosis is already noted in the diagnosis section. For the claimant's condition LEFT ANKLE CONDITION, the diagnosis is already noted in the diagnosis section.
this doctor has F'd both C&P's up!!!
To add to this I get some medical opinion in November 2014 from some doctor who apparently reviewed these C&P exams, my DBQ's submitted on my behalf by my Podiatrist at the time.
This is so ridiculous!
On top of this, the DRO takes my Nexus letters supposedly into consideration but no rationale? See attached the Nexus LetterNexus letter-redacted .pdf
Question
Navy4life
Hi everyone;
I have several threads going but i want to get these C&P exams out there in the open. Please look at both C&P exams (Foot Conditions) (Ankle Conditions). Look at the errors done by ONE doctor.
The first C&P exam I attached is for Foot Misc. The very first error by the C&P examiner is the fact that he states under #1 Diagnoses Avulsion Fracture 5th Metatarsal - date of diagnoses 6/23/2013. That is WRONG! If you look at the other C&P Exam for Ankles, under #1 Diagnoses he states right 5th metatarsal fracture - date of diagnoses 1993! YES that is right! See where I am going with this????
Let's continue on....
C&P exam for Foot Misc - #2 Medical History - he specifically states Toe condition left toe. The date of the symptoms 1991.
#3 Morton's Neuroma - YES left.
#15 Functional Impact - YES
#16 Remarks - For the claimant's claimed of RIGHT FOOT CONDITION, there is no diagnoses because the claimant does not claim the condition. For the claimant condition LEFT FOOT CONDITION, the diagnosis is already noted in the diagnosis section. For the claimants condition of TOE CONDITION ON LEFT FOOT, the diagnosis is already noted in the diagnosis section.
He is obviously mistaken on my right foot condition because it was in my original claim May 2013 but let's continue....
C&P exam for Ankles - #1 Diagnosis - He notes ankle sprain 1993 and he notes right 5th metatarsal fracture 1993 BUT he puts it as LEFT foot! WTF????? Do you see this??? First he has the right fracture on my foot C&P exam with the wrong date, then on this one he has the right fracture but noted on the left foot!
#2 Medical History: States my history
#17 Functional Impact - YES
#18 Remarks - The claimant now has or has had ankle condition. For the claimants claimed condition of RIGHT ANKLE CONDITION, the diagnosis is already noted in the diagnosis section. For the claimant's condition LEFT ANKLE CONDITION, the diagnosis is already noted in the diagnosis section.
this doctor has F'd both C&P's up!!!
To add to this I get some medical opinion in November 2014 from some doctor who apparently reviewed these C&P exams, my DBQ's submitted on my behalf by my Podiatrist at the time.
This is so ridiculous!
On top of this, the DRO takes my Nexus letters supposedly into consideration but no rationale? See attached the Nexus LetterNexus letter-redacted .pdf
C&P Exam Feet 7-2013_Redacted.pdf
C&P Exam Ankles 7-2013_Redacted.pdf
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
5
1
1
Popular Days
Sep 1
9
Aug 31
4
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 6 posts
Navy4life 5 posts
MarkInTexas 1 post
Buck52 1 post
Popular Days
Sep 1 2016
9 posts
Aug 31 2016
4 posts
Popular Posts
broncovet
There are several ways to challenge an exam. First, find out the qualifications of the examiner. The examiner should have either training (medical) or experience IN THE APPLICABLE FIELD for his opi
broncovet
Ok. Remember, it takes MEDICAL EVIDENCE to refute Medical Evidence, lay evidence wont suffice. Your opinion, only, that the doctor was wrong will unlikely to achieve a refutation of the medical evid
Buck52
This is a little long to read but it helps understand the appeals process Once an SOC is issued, the DRO process is complete. If the appeal continues, it is now under the Traditional appeals pr
12 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now