Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
marinevet61

Camp lejeune appeal hearing

Question

On Thursday oct. 6 got a call from Louisville. The person wanted to know when would be a good time to set a date and time for a hearing. They wanted to know if I wanted formal or informal hearing by phone. He said informal DRO can make immediate decision and informal would take 2-3 months. Got another call today time and date was set. 

I requested informal hearing. This hearing is on an appeal for Camp Lejeune from 2014. I hope I made the right decision requesting informal hearing. In the initial phone 

Call the person talked briefly about some of the evidence that they had and I brought up the Nexus letter from my oncologist. She stated that the word could was used by

My oncologist. I felt that she was trying to tell me that the word could is not very strong. The dictionary defines "could" (To show a possibility.) Can anyone comment on 

this? My original claim was rated and denied by an SME. I found out that the SME is only a PCP.( Primary Care Physician) who is not an expert in oncology. As I have never

Been through a DRO hearing I am asking for any advice as to what to expect. 

Thanks to all of you 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

She was right.... the proper criteria for an IMO/IME is here under read First before getting an IMO/IME.

"Could" is too speculative...did the doctor bolster their opinion with some sound medical texts and a full medical rationale?

Your oncologist certainly should outweight the PCP opinion, but VA looks for the minefields in these private opinions. ..and they found one already...the word "could."

Maybe your oncologist would be able to look over the IMO criteria here and add an addendum to his opinion.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

Berta he did not speculate or add a rationale. I was lucky to get what I did get from him. None of

My other docs would take the time or just Flat refused. I have asked again and he says that this is

All he will do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I assume this opinion did not cost you anything.

I have had multiple claims but needed an IMO for one of them, actually I got 3 IMOs and even ordered a third one I didnt need..

It was one of the best investments I ever made....but costly.

Many years prior  to that I had won a FTCA  VA case by myself..wrongful death , 1151 award too.......no lawyer, no independent medical opinion...I did all the legal and medical work myself. I just had mailing fees and PC ink, paper costs

But the difference is that, unlike my RO,  I was dealing directly with VA General Counsel lawyers in DC... and they can read.

Lawyers not only LOVE evidence, the VA lawyers know 38 USC,and 38 CFR  to the letter.

I am on my RO's crap list since winning the FTCA so I didnt take any chances and got those IMOs for the next claim.

You asked what you could expect and maybe the VA will find your doc's opinion of equal value probatively to their med opinion  that denied the claim...... maybe .....That means you would possibly win the claim under Relative Equipoise.(Benefit of Doubt)

However as a hardcore claimant myself, I sure would not depend on that , on what you stated here, that the DRO said.

Remember who owns the Benefit of Doubt Scale.

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Berta you are correct, I did not have to pay for the Nexus letter from my oncologist. I have thought about

What you said about who owns the benefit of the doubt. I have made up my mind to get through this hearing

and whatever I need to do if I am denied again I will get it done as long as I have the strength to keep going.

Thank you for your time and all of the information. Will let you know how it turns out.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I mentioned above I had ordered and paid for a 4th IMO but the BVA awarded before that IMO doctor completed it.The company (forensic specialists) refunded about half of what I paid.

I ordered the 4th C & P because I didnt know if the BVA would accept my rebuttal to the VA's last C & P exam, but they did...I jumped the $$$ gun.;..so I hesitate to tell you that you need an IMO.....but I think you do, because of what the VA  said about the word ":could."

Did you already post the denial here at hadit? If so, I will search for it...and I hope others chime in.

 

Long ago I  helped a local vet years ago who got a free IME from his private doc but his doc got pissed off at the vet and me , because I also had included a healthgrade run down on him with the documented evidence I found in the veteran's SMRs. This was before I even knew Dr Bash and could prepare the IMO/IME posts here.

This Doc, a well known NY Endocrinologist,  thought everyone in NY and at the Buffalo VAR0 knew how good he was. His healthgrades run down was excellent and detailed his experience etc.Maybe VA did recognize how prominent he was ,  but they didnt give a shit because their lousy C & P exams were done by nurses, with no clue at all on diabetes, and this endo doc's first IMO was awful.

I have dealt with Buffalo RO for over 20 years so I know how difficult they are to deal with.

I paid 4,000 for 2 IMOs from Dr Bash and then the next one was almost 2,000 as well but they refunded about half when I called them and told them I just had received the award letter.

I do not regret at all these fees ( and not all IMO docs would charge this much..but some might charge more)..You already have an IMO from your doc that could bolster another one ,from an oncologist, that conforms to the IMO/IME criteria I posted the link to,  to overcome their C & P exams.....

Maybe someone here has had a good experience with this type of oncologist IMO/IME, from a real doctor ...which you have , but VA, in my opinion, will consider his opinion as too "speculative" and deny the claim again.

BTW The above vet's endocrinologist doctor did comply with another IMO giving a full medical rationale this time for his opinion,reading the SMRs and all of the time consuming work I had already done on this claim. The vet had been denied multiple times by then because no one else would read his SMRs  and figure out what they said.

I had attached copies of many handwritten SMRs, I had to decifer them all,hard to read...to support my lay diagnosis of diabetes, while the vet was in service. The military had diagnosed and treated him for VD...which he never had, and which his documented inservice symptoms did not support. He had diabetes, not VD.

He won the claim when they got the 2nd IMO/IME from the Endocrinogist..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines