Jump to content

Sponsored Ads

  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • 0

Diagnosis change


So I have plenty of questions trying to get this straightened out.  My original diagnosis from the VA was Dermititis (the decision letter says   "minimal erythematous slightly scaly patches (claimed as skin condition)"  Since being out of the military it has been officially biopsied and diagnosed as Psoriasis. I filed and claim and I am going in for a new C&P for increase.  Should or will they adjust these conditions on my claim.  They both have the same rating criteria.  However I want to file for a secondary condition of Psoriatic arthritis eventually.  Is this going to be a problem with previous compensation and the increase.  My current medical records don't reflect the same condition as the decision letter.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

SPO , is the diagnostic code the same for the newer diagnosis?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • 0

I've notice that in some cases the diagnoses can be different & some have there own diagnoses, in other words they can use the same diagnose codes for other disability's

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

yeah, they can determine an analogous code.

This involves CUE Buck , this vet needs help, but his CUE is good.

A Cue can occur if the VA uses the wrong diagnostic code to a veteran's detriment but I think this change of diagnosis might involve the same  analogous disability they rated in the decision he is cueing, and then it might be OK, the way the CUE stands.

More input from others is needed here.




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

The code is different. The one I was awarded is 7806 and the new diagnosis would be 7816.  However, in the decision letter they noted a history of psoriasis(7816).  The increase claim suggested a Dbq for 7806, but my doc will only do 7816 because that's the proper diagnosis.  They both fall on the skin diseases dbq.  These 2 conditions are commonly confused.

Edited by SPO

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I kind of dont see it that way.   The reason is Roberson.  It is not the Veteran's job to identify the diagnostic code, nor is the Veteran competent to self diagnose his own maladies.  

According to Roberson, the VA has a duty to maximize the Veterans claim.  They have to assume he is seeking the maximum benefit allowable by law.  

There are 3 criteria involved for a claim.  

1.  The claim has to be IN Writing.  

2.  The claimant must identify that he is seeking BENEFITS, not just treatment.  

3.  The claimant mus "identify the benefit sought."   


     The courts have been liberal at allowing the Veteran much lattitude in "identifying the benefit sought".  Veterans come in all education levels.  Some are not always literate in the English language, and many, if not most do not have a background in medical terminology.  Very few are doctors capable of diagnosing illnesses.  

      You dont need a precise diagnosis and diagnostic code to get benefits.  You can simply point to the part that hurts:  "I want to appy for benefits for my knee, it hurts" should suffice.  You dont have to know if its arthritis/bursitis, a fracture, a compound fracture, and, you dont need to know whether its the tibia/fibula fracture or joint, or if its the patello/tibia joint that is the problem.   To get benefits, you need only "identify the benefit sought" by stating you hurt your knee jumping out of airplanes, and that made the other knee hurt, also.  

      Yes, I know the VA tries to get away with this.  Especially if the Veteran applies for patello/tibia arthritis, when the doctor actually diagnoses bursitis of the tibia/fibia joint.  

       The Veteran is simply not required to identify "tibia patello" or the name of the joint of the benefit sought.  Instead, the VA is required to assist the Veteran, and if his diagnosis was inaccurate, and a doctor corrected him, the VA is not supposed to make the Vet start all over.  It happens anyway.  

        The bottom line is you appeal the denial.  Here is a case on Roberson (also Servello) :


The term "claim" or "application" means a formal or informal 
communication in writing requesting a determination of 
entitlement or evidencing a belief of entitlement, to a 
benefit.  38 C.F.R. § 3.1(p).  "Date of receipt" generally 
means the date on which a claim, information or evidence was 
received by VA.  38 C.F.R. § 3.1(r).  

An informal claim is any communication or action, indicating 
an intent to apply for one or more benefits under the laws 
administered by VA, from a claimant, his or her duly 
authorized representative, a Member of Congress, or some 
person acting as next friend of a claimant who is not sui 
juris may be considered an informal claim.  Such informal 
claim must identify the benefit sought.  38 C.F.R. § 

VA is required to look to all communications from the 
appellant which may be interpreted as applications or claims, 
formal and informal, for benefits.  In particular, VA is 
required to identify and act on informal claims for benefits.  
38 U.S.C.A. § 5110(b)(3); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.1(p), 3.155(a); See 
Servello v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. App. 196 (1992).  All that is 
required is that the communication indicates an intent to 
apply for one or more benefits under the laws administered by 
the Department, and identify the benefits sought.  Rodriguez 
v. West, 189 F.3d 1351 (1999).  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • OK so I had pancreatectomy in 2003 due to an impacted goldstone 2/3 of my  Pancreas was removed I am type one diabetes with very large scars continued diarrhea stomach problems Constant back and shoulder pain I recently received a Nexus letter from my  endocrinologist related to my service in the gulf war.  Any suggestions or advice from anyone
    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
        • Haha
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 11 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:


      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.


      • 10 replies

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines