Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Outside Va Ortho Doctors

Rate this question


Question

Posted

have had right ankel problems since injury in vietnam,local va took x rays va ortho said northing wrong with your ankel. ankel went to sleep could not walk. finally went to outside ortho . dr lewis ordered a mri results hair line frature ankel. you need sergry on it. va deined my claim on this ankel . cant wait till my dro hearing to show them the results. cheif 313

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Chief

The reason the VA did not do the MRI is simply because they are too cheap. You should file a section 1151 if you have suffered any additional disability through the VA's malpractice. I would not trust the VA's orthopedist for anything since all they think about is saving money for the VA.

Posted

John is right Chief-

If I were you I would hand the DRO (if the hearing is soon)(and get it VA stamped) or mail this certified with tracking slip to this VARO:

This is a claim under Section 1151, 38 USC.

I believe that my medical records from the VA and subsequent private medical records from Dr. Lewis,which I will obtain and send in support of this claim, will reveal that the VA has been negligent and the VA has caused me additional disability.

(It would be good to attach and refer to copies of those records if you have them and just change the wording of this claim)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Kinda reminds me of my situation.

The Corps booted me from the service because of me going to sickbay and then to Navy Hospital Balboa because of the fact that when I injured my ankle they took an xray of it and found that it had been broken before service (and healed without any complications or residual conditions, but they simply overlooked THAT fact)........ah hah, no service connection, pre-existing condition, get the heck outta here........

Come to find out, they sent me home on crutches..........with a broken tibia....that did not show up on xray simply because of the fact that when they took their xray, they did not "shoot the film" high enough up my ankle/leg for the broken tibia to appear on the xray.

So, I tried to walk around for MONTHS before it finally just healed itself, and not too neat of a job of healing at that.

Nothing like walking around for a year on a broken leg/ankle.

Thanks, guys. Appreciate the heck out of that.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Posted

Larry - this is why the Feres Doctrine Sucks.

The mil can bugger someone and they have no recourse.

If the VA had done the full X rays and then misinterpreted then, then you would have had basis for Section 1151 claim too- no time limit on Sec 1151 claims.

But it sounds to me like the VA actually discovered the problem.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted
Larry - this is why the Feres Doctrine Sucks.

The mil can bugger someone and they have no recourse.

If the VA had done the full X rays and then misinterpreted then, then you would have had basis for Section 1151 claim too- no time limit on Sec 1151 claims.

But it sounds to me like the VA actually discovered the problem.

Naw, Berta, the VA didn't discover it. My private doc and his radiologist associate finally figured out what the problem has been for years. Actually, the first set of films that they took of my ankle, they also failed to shoot the pics up far enough on my leg/ankle, by about 1/2", but he got to feeling around and says "what the heck is this bump right here?" and I says "heck I don't know, it's been there ever since I got home from the Corps.........". He says, "musta come down pretty hard on that foot, huh....?" I says, "No shi*, Manard"!

And, that's about where this chapter of this saga started....................

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Grey Goose earned a badge
      First Post
    • Matrev earned a badge
      First Post
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Patrol Agent earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use