Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question 

 Click To Read Current Posts  

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

SMC-S, Filing Procedure, and Back Pay

Rate this question


Ward868

Question

100% p&t, since 2012... (ptsd)... I want to file for smc-s, but frankly, cant remember how to get the ball rolling... My c&p exam in 2011, clearly stated agoraphobia...Any suggestions, would be appreciated..Also, when approved, do you believe  retro will go back to 2012.. Thank you all, again, for your input, and advice... 

SEMPER FI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

To add: 

https://www.va.gov/vetapp16/Files3/1624678.txt

This is an agoraphobia BVA award and reveals the rating schedule for agoraphobia:

“ORDER

 

Entitlement to a rating of 50 percent, and no greater, for agoraphobia prior to May 2, 2008 is granted. “

 

This was not a HB award however, because the veteran’s TDIU claim was not decided yet.

It shows how the veteran got to 50% for agoraphobia.

Also you could formally claim it but I could not find any specific form for HB.If the VA awards the claim, then it would not be too difficult to raise CUE at that point ,it is would warrant more retro.

I cant copy and paste from my M21-1MR,but you can google this:

M21-1MR ,Part III,Subpart IV,Chapter 6,Section B

For more info on what is an inferred issue.

Regarding the VA HB award statement in my Nehmer decision...that resolved my 2 CUE claims regarding SMC, .that was based on extensive documented evidence that my husband was housebound at time of the 1998 decision I CUed. I guess this is why they awarded the SMC CUE both ways.

Was there any other documented evidence in your VA med recs that would support the CUE for lack of HB consideration that indicates you are HB due to the agoraphobia?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks, Berta, for all, your input..To answer your question, ,... I don't if any other documentation exists in my records, claiming reference to agoraphobia, or housebound...The only thing I know for certain is, rating sheet  clearly stated diagnosis of ptsd, panic disorder w/ agoraphobia, major depressive disorder, severe...The va examiner noted you have total social, and occupupational impairment....               So that's all the evidence i have, for CUE, that smc-s, should have been inferred...after reading other posts, don't know if its enough, but i think I'm gonna try...Thanks, again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This clarifies everything :

"The only thing I know for certain is, rating sheet  clearly stated diagnosis of ptsd, panic disorder w/ agoraphobia, major depressive disorder, severe...The va examiner noted you have total social, and occupupational impairment... "

It looks to me that they included the agoraphobia within the 100% rating.I have seen that done before.

That is not a CUE.

The VA will only award one MH disability.

You can certainly claim it causes you to be Housebound, but with the 'rating sheet" statement above,I think the C & P examiner based that on symptoms you relayed to him/her

and it might be possible to get the HB award but you would need more evidence for it than what appears to already be considered by VA in the 100% rating.

This is the DBQ for both A & A and HB exams:

http://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/VBA-21-2680-ARE.pdf

In this recent BVA case the veteran was found to be Housebound:

https://www.va.gov/vetapp16/Files3/1622748.txt

The BVA's explanation is this:

"In weighing the evidence the Board observes that the evidentiary information provided in October 2013 by Dr. D. S. as well as by the VA examinations addressed primarily the impact of the Veteran's service-connected disabilities with respect to the Veteran's ability to work. However, in the context of entitlement to SMC based on HB the essential matter is not the impact on the Veteran' ability to work but whether the Veteran is substantially confined to his premises. As to this, the Board observes that the June 2011 VA examination noted that the Veteran was not able to prepare his own meals and needed assistance in bathing and tending to other hygiene needs. Crucially, it was reported that he seldom left his own home and could only walk for less than one block. Dr. D.S. also maintained that the Veteran experienced pain that was intractable and virtually incapacitating. Physical activity, e.g., walking, standing, bending, stooping, and moving his extremities increased his pain to the extent that bed rest was necessary. From the foregoing, and after giving due consideration to the favorable resolution of doubt under 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.102, the Board concludes that after May 1, 2011, the Veteran was so functionally impaired as to be substantially confined to his immediate premises due to his service-connected disabilities which remained throughout the Veteran's lifetime."

For my SMC Cue I proved the 100% plus 60% error ( My Husband was at that time 100% SC P & T plus 100% SC 1151 P & T ,as CUE but bolstered my CUE with significant medical evidence (in VA's possession at time of the 1998 CUE) that the veteran was also housebound.

Although he was 100% P & T for PTSD I could not rely on that, but could reply on his 1151 stroke (100% P & T)

BTW all, I am in the midst of my latest battle-3 CUE claims sent last week regarding the 100% P & T under 1151, who the director of my VARO (by ignoring my evidence AGAIN, insisted to me by phone,that their prior rating did NOT mean the veteran was 100% Permanent due to stroke under 1151 when he died.But that he was totally disabled by it.

I have 13 pieces of evidence ( one from a former VA Secretary) that says he was 100% P & T due to the 1151 stroke and three other VA doctors stated that as well.... at a C & P, plus his VOC rehab records, and his student loan waiver was signed by a VA doctor who also clicked on the P & T box on the form.

VA has to cough up their proof of their  "cure" for his 1151 Totally and Permanently disabled stroke- a cure that they never told the veteran about and caused the 1151 stroke in the first place so you would think they would gladly have let us know in the veteran's lifetime that his continuously totally disabled and permanent stroke , had in fact been " cured" because their recent HBP CUE award and that evidence ( From VACO -FTCA case)proves that VA did nothing at all to alter their medical errors to prevent the stroke, and covered up additional malpractice on the stroke and his AO IHD DMII and heart disease.

If you die with a continuous  total SC disability, and VA has not performed a miraculous cure for it, you have also died with a Permanent and Total SC  disability , because it Lasted your Lifetime.

I have never ever seen any decision at the BVA or elsewhere that ever has changed that established medical fact.

This is why you all need to get the spouse up to speed.

If a vet dies with a 100% P & T rating that has lasted ten years, can the VA say to his widow yeah he died with a 100% P & T total rating but it wasn't really permanent when he died.So No DIC for you.

If you die with a 100% P & T rating less than 10 years that VA continually ignores the evidence for, and says it was Total but Not Permanent, is you spouse fully prepared for that ridiculous battle over any accrued amount or potential DIC when you die?

 

 

 

 

 

Death makes a standing 100% award Permanent at death.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thx, again, berta...I value your opinion, and after reading your last reply, i guess I should forget about a cue, for smc-s...if you don't think its warranted, I'm not gonna drive myself nuts, pursuing it.. maybe, start a new claim, for smc-s, but no cue... appreciate, greatly, your help, and advice, with this matter...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta,

You will note that VLJ is still in the dark about "housebound" being defined as "substantially confined to the home". Howell v. Nicholson contradicts that and is the defining definition of what SMC S was invented to compensate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yeah, 'invented' good point and this case is explained here in Alex's full attention to what Howell really says:

https://asknod.org/2014/08/25/cavc-howell-v-nicholson-what-smc-s-really-says/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use