Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
huskerfanfl

Iris Inquiry

Question

I know that some of us spend a good deal of time bashing the VA, but I sent an IRIS inquiry up yesterday asking about the status of an appeal that was submitted in April 2005, and whether the new claim I submitted last month would cause any problems with the appeal.

I received a reply back in less than 2 hours notifying me that my appeal was sent to the appeals team on December 4th, and that my new claim would wait until the appeal was finished since my record could only be in one place at a time.

While it has taken a long time for the appeal, the quick reply to the inquiry was certainly a surprise and remarkable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

I just used IRIS for the first time and sent the following complaint,

chances are that I won't get an answer.

Complaint:

It is the standing policy of the VARO TOGUS to send letters to all individuals that are scheduled for a video hearing on a specific day that their appointment is for 0830 and that they are to arrive one half hour before their scheduled hearing time. There is no indication on any correspondence that the actual hearings arescheduled that day on a first come-first served basis and depending on how many hearings are scheduledthe potential exists that the veteran will be waiting for an extended period of time. This practice is very inconsiderate of the veteran and the VSO who is representing the veteran. Clearly it implies a total disregard for the value of the veteran's and VSO's time.

In MANY cases at this specific RO the veteran must travel great distance to get to the RO and it makes the issue even worse if the individual veteran is economically or physically disadvantaged and cannot provide their own transportation.

If you use the example that the Veteran who lives 3 hours away is using others for their transportation and must arrive at 0800 and there are multiple hearing to be conducted, you place the veteran in the position of having to be up and on the road sometime around 0300 and having them exhausted by the time their

hearing time arrives. this places the veteran at an extreme disadvantage at the hearing and is blatantly

unfair and discriminatory.

The VARO TOGUS claims that it is due to the BVA directives and unchangeable even though the RO TOGUS schedules all the hearing and can make the appropriate change if they so chose.

This has been a long standing issue brought to the management's attention many times and they demonstrate a capricious disreguard for the people they are supposed to be helping.

XXXXXXXXXX, the Regional office Director basically told me that "this is the way it is". He further stated to me that if I didn't like it I could leave.

Terrible customer service and a shining example of the pervasive attitude in that office that it's my way or the highway.

I specifically asked about a timeline for a policy change and was ignored.

I believe it is reasonable that I be given a written apology by the Veteran Service Manager for the poor conduct of his employee, and a new policy be established following a complete review of the scheduling process that takes into consideration the Veteran and VSO's time along with other appropriate considerations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest jangrin

Pipeman,

Very nicely done. You might think about a few higher ups here and there that you could cc a copy of your letter to. I am of the belief that the everyone involved in this claim process needs to start making some noise of we expect t see any type of change in this terible system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, what I did was after sending in the IRIS inquiry,

I took all that I had written and sent by email to the AMC

and the VBAOmbudsman with a note telling them that

this was sent to make them aware of an issue that has the

potential to be explosive.... If someone were to file a

brief with the CVAC saying that all decisions made that

were unfavorable to the claimant due to the vet being under

duress and fatigue that could begin a class action suit that

would not be in the VA's best interest. Can you just imagine

calling into question that volume of claims due to discrimination.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

In an effort to be fair and equitable here is the response

provided by the VA after some prodding by telephone both

in Washington and at the Eastern Area Directors Office.

I guess the phone calls moved my service complaint from the

"ignore" pile to the " Do something to shut him up" pile. B)

I did eliminate names to protect the "innocent". The Va's

response came yesterday afternoon, 05 Jan 07

Original Complaint sent 22 Dec 06 @ 0650.

Mr. XXXXXXX,

Good morning. After our conversation yesterday afternoon, I contacted the Veterans Service Center Manager, XXXXX XXXXXXX, at the Togus Regional Office (RO) who is now serving as the Acting Director since the retirement of Mr. XXX XXXXX. I asked that he prepare a response to your inquiry along with a status update of your pending appeal. While I do not think the response below will resolve your dissatisfaction with the VA appellate process and, specifically, scheduling of hearings, I am hoping this recognition of your frustration will, at a minimum, alleviate some of your dissatisfaction. We do understand your legitimate concern but are somewhat constrained by the procedures established by the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA).

I will also forward this correspondence to the Compensation and Pension (C&P) Service in Washington as C&P Service is responsible for the policy and procedures that govern how ROs must operate. In situations regarding our interaction with BVA, they must work with that organization regarding policy and procedural guidance. I do not want to mislead you into thinking that this will immediately change the current hearing policy, but it is at least, a step toward in the right direction.

Again, on behalf of James Whitson, Eastern Area Director and VA, I apologize for any inconveniences and poor customer service. It is our job to provide you the benefits and services you are entitled to, in recognition for your service to our country, and we should always do so with the highest level of customer service.

XXXXXX

Supervisory Management Analyst

Eastern Area Office

734-930-5800

Please see the below response from Mr. XXXXXXXX:

Mr. XXXXXXXXX

I am writing in reference to a complaint you submitted pertaining to a recent Board of Veterans Affairs (BVA) hearing you attended at the Togus Regional Office.

Please accept my apologies for any inconveniences caused to you. Additionally, allow me to express my understanding toward your dissatisfaction with the current policy regarding the scheduling of hearings before a BVA Law Judge. As you have clearly pointed out, there are times when an appellant will have to travel long distances in order to arrive at their BVA hearings. Once an appellant arrives, they may be asked to wait, based on the order of their arrival.

Unfortunately, BVA has mandated the scheduling policy to our Regional Offices. This policy is in effect at every Regional Office in the nation. The notification sent to you on 11-13-06 was a letter, which has been approved by BVA, and stated, “…hearings are scheduled on a first come, first serve basis…”

so sorry, but this above quoted statement is NOT in the letter

I can assure you that the employees at the Togus Regional Office, along with myself, are dissatisfied with the current policy set by BVA. The former Director of the Togus Regional Office, XXXXXXXXX, and I, have met with your local American Legion representative on multiple occasions to discuss this very topic.

Your claims files is still currently located at BVA and our electronic records indicate your case is pending transcription.

Be assured that it is our goal to ensure that all veterans and their dependents receive the best services we can provide. However, we must operate within the laws and regulations that govern our actions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:55 PM

To:XXXXXXXXX, VBADTRT

Subject: Fw: Service Complaint

Hello,

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

----- Original Message -----

From: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To: amcquery@vba.va.gov

Cc: BVAOmbudsman@mail.va.gov

Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 8:36 AM

Subject: Service Complaint

Hello,

In conjunction with my ongoing appeal, I requested a Travel Board Hearing be scheduled at my local RO.

I was informed by the TOGUS RO that no travel board hearings were available or being scheduled in the

foreseeable future in an effort to reduce existing backlog, reduce expenses, and increase productivity.

I was then scheduled for a Video Conference Hearing that was conducted on Monday, 18 Dec 06.

Due to issues that arose involving that event, I forwarded the following service complaint via IRIS and

am providing this information in an effort to make you aware of the problem.

At bare minimum I expect written acknowledgement of receipt and indication of planned corrective action.

Thank you for you attention to this matter.

IRIS SUBMISSION:

It is the standing policy of the VARO TOGUS to send letters to all individuals that are scheduled for

a video hearing on a specific day that their appointment is for 0830 and that they are to arrive one

half hour before their scheduled hearing time. There is no indication on any correspondence that

the actual hearings are scheduled that day on a first come-first served basis and depending on

how many hearings are scheduled the potential exists that the veteran will be waiting for an

extended period of time. This practice is very inconsiderate of the veteran and the VSO who

is representing the veteran. Clearly it implies a total disregard for the value of the veteran's

and VSO's time.

In MANY cases at this specific RO the veteran must travel great distance to get to the

RO and it makes the issue even worse if the individual veteran is economically or physically

disadvantaged and cannot provide their own transportation.

If you use the example that the Veteran who lives 3 hours away is using others for their

transportation and must arrive at 0800 and there are multiple hearing to be conducted,

you place the veteran in the position of having to be up and on the road sometime

around 0300 and having them exhausted by the time their hearing time arrives.

This places the veteran at an extreme disadvantage at the hearing and is blatantly

unfair and discriminatory.

The VARO TOGUS claims that it is due to the BVA directives and unchangeable even

though the RO TOGUS schedules all the hearing and can make the appropriate

change if they so chose.

This has been a long standing issue brought to the management's attention many

times and they demonstrate a capricious disregard for the people they are

supposed to be helping.

XXX XXXX, the Regional office Director basically told me that "this is the way it is".

He further stated to me that if I didn't like it I could leave.

Terrible customer service and a shining example of the pervasive attitude in that

office that it's my way or the highway.

I specifically asked about a timeline for a policy change and was ignored.

I believe it is reasonable that I be given a written apology by the

Veteran Service Manager for the poor conduct of his employee,

and a new policy be established following a complete review of

the scheduling process that takes into consideration the Veteran

and VSO's time along with other appropriate considerations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
      • 6 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:


      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis


      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.


      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 

       

      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.

       

      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines