Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
betrayed

Ptsd Diagnosis

Question

Got the copy of progress notes from my last pyschiatrist visit it says

Axis I Major Depressive disorder

Generalized anxiety order v panic disorder with agoraphobia

Nicotine dependence

R/o PTSD

what does the R/o mean?

A couple of weeks ago I posted the above in this post and got various answers.

Yesterday I had a appoinment with the head of the PCT (POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER CLINICAL TREATMENT TEAM) to discuss my assessment. I told him about the above R/o in the above diagnosis. He told me that it means the doctor thinks I have PTSD but has refered me to a specialist to make that diagnosis. I asked him you are that expert, he said yes. I said and you have diagnosed me with PTSD and he said yes.

Here comes the kicker, he said even though we have given you that diagnosis it is seperate from the C&P Exam for PTSD you will get. (which is tomorrow). He told me the POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER CLINICAL TREATMENT TEAM has diagnosed people with PTSD and the C&P doc has not diagnosed them with PTSD and then he told me that The C&P Doctor has made a diagnosis of PTSD and the POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER CLINICAL TREATMENT TEAM disagreed???????????????

Now I ask you this, I have my Pyschiatrist who writes

Axis I Major Depressive disorder

Generalized anxiety order v panic disorder with agoraphobia

Nicotine dependence

R/o PTSD

then in the narrative writes probable PTSD, educated patient that Celexa will treat PTSD. He does a referal to a specialist (PCT who is two docs a MD and a PHD) and they make the diagnosis and start treatment, HOW THE HELL COULD A C&P DOC SAY I DONT HAVE PTSD?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

"Easy, it's about the money. I've got a vet they keep denying has PTSD but they've been treating him for PTSD for about 4 yrs. Duh!"

Not that I really want to take the VA's side, but I can understand how this might happen. Suppose the veteran is displaying all of the symptoms for PTSD but the stressors are unable to be verified and they cannot connect it to service. In that case, it would be a good thing that the VA medical stafee is treating the PTSD even though it has not been SC.

No problem. I've got published proof of rocket attack on the Air Base he worked as dog handler on security patrol. VA rater claims stressor not severe enough. Sorry VA but that's a shrinks decision to make not a raters. jmo

pr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is amazing that someone can sit in an office years later and tell a veteran what happened was not stressful enough. I suppose next they will say because they sat through "Saving Private Ryan" without getting stressed then combat is not stressful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me tell you a story.....

a little bit of background first, I have been playing this game since January of 2004,

my SOC is about 14 pages long, all of the claimed stressors have been verified by

the VA, I filed this claim at the direction of the psychiatrist who wrote in my treatment

record that I had chronic PTSD and that I was told by him to initiate the claim. He had

been treating me for about 6 months prior to this and had written that his impression

had been PTSD at every prior visit. Axis I = PTSD. the GAF varies from 39 up to 53

depending on my mood I guess. 3 months after I file my claim I show up for my

appointment and the psychiatrist I had been seeing has been terminated and I get

a new psychiatrist who says that while I have signs and symptoms of PTSD I also

have a major depressive disorder NOS (not otherwise specified). Due to other medical

issues such as coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure , hypertension, bilateral

demylinating peripheral neuropathy in all extremities I filed for both Non service connected

disability and for service connected. both got denied almost immediately. Filed for reconsideration

by DRO on both and S/C was denied and the NSC was granted 16 months after the original

filing date. Filed a NOD. My "C" file got lost in transit after it was certified to the BVA.

Jump ahead to yesterday, was supposed to get the travel board hearing that I requested

but was scheduled for the Video hearing. The RO does all the scheduling and notification.

Letter says that hearing is for 0830 and to arrive half hour earlier. I show up at the RO

and am told to go see my VSO first. I go over to his office in a different building and he

tells me that everyone is scheduled for 0830 and that he has to find out when hearing is

REALLY scheduled for. He can't get anyone at the RO to answer the phone so we return to

the RO. Person behing the desk says that because I was not there @ 0800 that I go to the

end of the line and that all hearings are on a first come, first served basis. I get really ugly

and demand to speak to someone in authority. So as I am waiting here arrives a VA cop

that they requested be onhand to supervise me. There are other people also waiting there

so they try to get me into an office with the door closed because " I am disturbing the other clients"

well their ploy backfired cause I wouldn't move off my chair. They had me talk to three different people

before they finally got the regional office director to come talk to me. All I got was the same BS rhetoric

about how the BVA scheduled all the hearings and I would have to contact them.....So

here we are, the VSO and myself sitting there having four people in a row come out and tell

us lies that both they and I already know are false. Hell of a system, we finally get through

the video hearing about three hours later. I asked the VSO how I am supposed to provide the additional

documents that I brought with me to the hearing, letters from my family and such. He tells me just

hold on to them for when you go to court. Don't you know that all these people are paid from the

same budget to say NO. They kept the cop right there to babysit me until after the last office person

spoke to me. then the cop left. I guess I wasn't a threat as long as someone wasn't lying to me.

God forbid that they would actually be forced to do what they are paid to do.

I thought that calling the cops on me was a little extreme, but especially so

since according to them I don't have rage issues and problems with

authority figures..... imagine that....

Thought this might be good for a chuckle, if I didn't think it was so funny and

stupid I might still be angry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I take it you got a NSC pension? Now you next goal is to get a service connected TDIU or 100% schedular claim. If the SC disabilities and the NSC disabilities are so intertwined that they are hard to separate as to their disabling affect on you the benefit of the doubt goes to you. The VA plays the game of blaiming your inability to work on you NSC conditions. I had that problem but eventually prevailed and my NSC conditions actually became SC'ed over time. It is almost impossible to separate many of these conditions. I had depression and other emotional conditions but had chronic pain also. One thing aggravated the other, so the VA blamed my IU on the chronic pain instead of the long standing service connected emotional problems. Also, it does not matter if you have PtSD or depression as long as it is SC. You can get 100% for either condition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hassle of proving PTSD is one reason I refuse to file for it. They can go on saying I suffer from anxiety and depression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.

       

      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.

       

      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.

       

      P&T

       

      TDIU

       

       

       

      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.

       










      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.


      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.


      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law


      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual


      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures


      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation


      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

       
      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.

       

      The report is here:

      https://www.nap.edu/read/25137/chapter/2

      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.

       

       

       
      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines