Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

100% PTSD and 100% Total??

Rate this question


SecurityForces03

Question

Hi All,

I'm currently 90% combined with PTSD and a few other issues. The PTSD is 70% of it.

My current claim is for PTSD increase and a few other increases. I think they'll all be increased.

If my PTSD increases to 100% and my other illnesses get increases to equal 100%, does it really matter for work purposes?

I want to try and work for sanity and routine purposes, but I've read you can't work if you have PTSD at 100%? Would it matter if all my other issues also equal 100?

Thanks!

Edited by SecurityForces03
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I believe if you stay at 70% for PTSD and if combined scheduler equals 100% your ok to try, but I'm not that much of an expert on this I'd wait until one of the elders on here tel you it's ok...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Founder

You are not the first one to ask this question and so far we've found no hard and fast rules on this. Though if you look at the Schedule for Rating Disabilities for Mental Disorders you will this as criteria for 100%

Total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as: gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name 38CFR 4.130   Schedule of ratings—Mental disorders

I wish I had a more solid answer for you.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It makes sense. If I was 100% solely on PTSD and 100% on everything else excluding PTSD, I would still be 100% PTSD.

In other words, my PTSD would be rated at 100% and my testicular, hearing, back and tinnitus would also equal 100%, then obviously I'd still be at 100%, but does the PTSD at 100% outweigh the other items that equal 100% as well? Tough.

Again, the working question comes up. Working a job that pays 10-15k a year is below the poverty line, compared to a 50-100K a year that many vets make while rates total and combined at 100%. I knew a few Fed Cops rated at 100% total while making 150K a year. Interesting topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Any chance you could post a redacted copy of your recent PTSD C & P DBQ that you believe supports a Bump from 70% to 100?

The 38 CFR 4 rating requirements for a 100% PTSD Rating haven't changed even though the DSM IV DX Criteria has changed to the DSM V.

You indicate this is a New Claim for PTSD Increase, what was your original PTSD Award & Effective date? You didn't NOD your original PTSD 70% Award, why not?

Were those Fed Cops rated at 100% solely on PTSD? That would be a scary thought, from the public and employer perspective. We can only imagine the Civil Litigation exposure that would create.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, Gastone said:

Any chance you could post a redacted copy of your recent PTSD C & P DBQ that you believe supports a Bump from 70% to 100?

The 38 CFR 4 rating requirements for a 100% PTSD Rating haven't changed even though the DSM IV DX Criteria has changed to the DSM V.

You indicate this is a New Claim for PTSD Increase, what was your original PTSD Award & Effective date? You didn't NOD your original PTSD 70% Award, why not?

Were those Fed Cops rated at 100% solely on PTSD? That would be a scary thought, from the public and employer perspective. We can only imagine the Civil Litigation exposure that would create.

Semper Fi

I just had my C&P exam for the PTSD increase. Some of the questions entailed my grooming and agoraphobia issues.

My original PTSD award was 70% in 2011. Things have gotten worse and I filed for agoraphobia, secondary to PTSD. I was scheduled this past week for a C&P exam. I didn't fight the original 70% because I felt that it was appropriate. I always compare to other vets but no 2 people are the same. 

Those cops I mentioned were Total and combined at 100%, not solely PTSD. Although, I do know plenty of cops out there rated at 70% PTSD and "working just fine". IMO, it seems like ratings are solely based on who is rating your case.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use