Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Complex EED Question: Reconsideration, NOD, or wait for BVA?


I was rated 50% depression, 40% lumbar spine chronic sprain with Degenerative Disk Disease, 10 percent hepatitis A, for a total of 70%.  I have some other denied secondary SC issues from a 2007 & 2009 claim, on appeal since 2011, waiting certification to BVA.  One of those issues is bilateral sciatica/lower extremity radiculopathy secondary to my lumbar disability.

Although the C&P back in 2010 did show the sciatica condition, and both the VA Neuro ( at least as likely SC) and my private chiropractor  (more likely than not SC) did opine in my favor, it was denied, and I appealed.

Last year I had surgery on my lumbar spine, and filed for temporary 100%, which I recently got after reconsideration.  In the Decision Letter, I was told I would have a C&P to check level of disability.

I got that Decision Letter today.  The VA C&P examiner recorded my Range of Motion (thoracolumbar flexion) at 50 degrees, well over the 30 degrees range of a 40% rating, so my lumbar disability is now immediately reduced to 20%.  

However, the exam also showed mild sciatica in both legs, so I am now rated 10% each side, effective 05/23/2017, the date of the C&P exam.

I guess I'm okay with the reduced rating for my back.  And my overall rating is unchanged, it is still 70%, so I'm reasonably happy.

However, I believe the lower extremity radiculopathy ratings should have an Earlier Effective Date of 2007, and I think I will achieve that.

My question:  Do I ask now for a reconsideration, or file an NOD?  But figuring that either of those will probably just further delay my BVA appeal, would I be better served to just sit on the EED question until the BVA hearing?

Thanks in advance for your input!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
On 6/9/2017 at 3:07 PM, acesup said:

I got that Decision Letter today.  The VA C&P examiner recorded my Range of Motion (thoracolumbar flexion) at 50 degrees, well over the 30 degrees range of a 40% rating, so my lumbar disability is now immediately reduced to 20%.  

if i was you i would certainly Disagree with this range of motion testing and deduction. it was maybe the one good day you had out of a year... i would fight this reduction big time.

also regarding your nerves both sides id fight this with the fact that they probably didnt give you correct testing for this rating and its well more than the 10% both sides

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • 0

Unless the issue of the the effective date is specifically addressed at the BVA (that is, you included the issue of effective date on your I9) , it wont be discussed at your hearing.  Its a jurisdtictional issue...the BVA does not have jurisdiction Until or unless the VEteran specifically gives the BVA control, when he files a NOD, and perfects his appeal with the I9.  

Therefore, you will need to file a NOD disputing the effective date, and why.  Remember, the regulation states that your effective date will be the later of "facts found" (that is, the date the doc said you were disabled) or the date you applied.  

If the VA is saying the doc said you were not disabled until 2014, but you applied in 2008, then you must refute the docs opinion to win an eed.    It wont help you to submit paperwork confirming you applied in 2008..its the later of the facts found or date you applied.  

However, there are several exceptions to the effective date general rule:

1.  If you applied within a year of your exit from service. 

2.  If you submitted new and material evidence under 38 CFR 3.156.   

3.  If this is an increased rating, special rules apply.  

4.  If you are a Nehmer Vet, special rules apply.  

5.  If the VA did not send you notice of your rights to appeal, special rules apply.  

6.  If there is CUE.  

7.  Sometimes an informal or inferred claim can alter effective dates.  

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Based on what I posted, you need to timely file a NOD, on the applicable form.  I dont recommend a reconsideration UNLESS you have new and material evidence.  You probably wont even know if you have new evidence until you have ordered your cfile and read it.  

If you file a NOD, your "new" nod, is sometimes combined by the Board with your "old" issues before the board, and both can be adjuticated at once.  I really dont know when and why the BVA combines these issues into one appeal, when there are seperate NOD dates, but I do know they did that for me, more than once.  

I have just yesterday been notified that my BVA appeal is complete, but I dont yet know the outcome, or even if they combined two seperate NOD's

(one on TDIU and one on SMC S) or not.  

Edited by broncovet
  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:



        • Thanks

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines