Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

VA Disability Claims Articles

Ask Your VA Claims Question | Current Forum Posts Search | Rules | View All Forums
VA Disability Articles | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users

  • hohomepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • 27-year-anniversary-leaderboard.png

    advice-disclaimer.jpg

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Rating Percentage Request on NOD

Rate this question


az arr

Question

I filed an appeal (NOD) requesting a DRO review. One of the questions on the NOD asks "Percentage (%) evaluation sought, if known."   If I list a number, am I bound to that number, or can the rater give more (I evaluated myself on ROM% ignoring other factors discussed)?  

 

Do I file an "amendment" to my claim requesting more, or if the rater gives  me the percentage that I requested, should I file a subsequent appeal asking the number to be adjusted (retroactive?) based on the higher percentage?   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Don't worry about it, the 38 CFR 4 used by the Rater determines your SC %. When a Vet files the initial Comp Claim, the VA Rater takes for granted that the Vet is looking for the highest SC Rating that he qualifies for.

You decided on a DRO Review rather than a DRO Hearing, why?

Have you submitted the VA Mandatory post Decision New & Material Evidence that was not available for the original Rater's Review? Failure to do so would result in an Administrative Denial of your Appeal.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree with Gastone but I  would sure remind them about the CFR 38 4 or state that my disability be rated to the fullest allowed by CFR law.

Even though the raters have a rating manual to go by for the correct % of the disability and in accordance with the degree  or symptoms of the disability.

AS Gastone mention those raters do take things for granted some times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you both for responding.

To answer your questions:  

a.)  Why DRO review vs. DRO hearing?  Good question, until I saw your post, I did not know there was a difference.  I thought, maybe wrongfully so, if the reviewer had any questions, he or she would have called or written.  Also, my initial claim was denied (properly so) because, I did not demonstrate chronicity (sp). But see b.) below.

b.) Did I submit N&M evidence for the DRO review? Yes, I provided an affidavit re: shoulder issues since my discharge; and I presented an objective report from a medical professional listing limitations of my shoulder.  

 

To expand, why did not I include the statement and medical report in my initial claim?  I filed the claim and thought the VA would order a C&P exam, at which time I would present the evidence to the examiner.  The VA did not order an exam, and the claim was denied (rightfully so). I appealed providing N&M evidence and asking for a C&P exam.  I requested a number for disability; however, upon reading my medical report and discussing with my doctor again, he thought I should have sought the higher number based on his findings and report. So, am I limited to the number requested (based on ROM) or can the rater give a higher number based on the medical report?  

It should be noted, that the C&P exam by the VA has not been ordered and ebenefits shows (I know, don't trust ebenefits) that the claim is now in PFD slightly more than 5 months after filing the NOD.  

 

As an aside, I did not appoint a VSO (again, did not know about this option until reading this board).    

 

Again, thank you for taking the time to read and respond.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

az arr,

     Buck52 is correct in that it would not hurt to state that you are seeking the maximum allowable by CFR 38. I would not personally state a specific percentage, but if you have done so it is not something to worry about. The rater/reviewer will follow the guidelines established and the metric the VA uses. You can see exactly how they do this by reading M21-1. You can find it here:

 https://www.knowva.ebenefits.va.gov/system/templates/selfservice/va_ss/#!portal/554400000001018/topic/554400000004210/M21-1-Adjudication-Procedures-Manual

     In the future, if you think the VA should schedule a C&P exam or are requesting one, actually put that into your claim. Never assume anything with the VA. You can find more information about the appeals process here:

https://www.knowva.ebenefits.va.gov/system/templates/selfservice/va_ss/#!portal/554400000001018/article/554400000014081/M21-1-Part-I-Chapter-5-Section-A-General-Information-on-Appeals

     If I may ask, how firm were you when asking for a C&P exam? Did you say something like, "Please consider this a formal request for a VA C&P exam to confirm the findings of Dr... etc" or was it softer or unclear in any way? I mean the VA can deny a C&P exam, however it is not something I have seen often. I have been away from this stuff for quite some time, but I haven't heard anything about that changing.

     In any case I really really recommend that you review CFR 38 (personally I read it almost in it's entirety many times) and M21-1 and M27-1. Knowledge is power in a very literal sense here.

Best of Luck,

Six

Edited by sixthscents
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you for responding.  To answer your question as to my request for a C&P - here is the quote from my NOD "Prior to denying the claim, the VA should send the claimant to a C&P exam."  That was the last sentence in the request for relief.  

 

It is somewhat concerning to me as the medical evidence I provided was not on a DBQ and was from a doctor of physical therapy (not an MD or DO). The doctor tested my ROM, but the VA's regs say the instrument MUST be used: he did not use the instrument (however, good medical professionals can "eyeball" it as well as an instrument can measure).  

 

For all I know, the VA might reject it on no service connection (which the C&P will not fix).  I don't know how or why the VA would deny on that bases (except I have been out of the Navy for over 20  years).   Who knows, I will have to wait and see, it has been PFD for 4 weeks today. 

 

Again, thank you for your time and for the references. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The regulations state the examiner must be "competent" in his field.  It does not necessarily mean a doctor, but your doctor making said opinion should have training and or medical experience in your disability sought.  The VA often uses nurse practioners, nurses, heck they may even use a janitor to do a c and p exam.  You see, the examiner is presumed to be competent, absent a challenge from the Veteran or his representative.  

Often, the examiner is unqualified.  I had a MD give me an exam for sleep apne..and the examiner had no experience or training in sleep medicine.  I did challenge the exam, but am waiting on results.  The examiner admitted to not being familiar with sleep medicine, but said my sleep apnea was not due to service anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use