Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Berta

Brain Cancer and AO

Question

Ben Krause, well known vets advocate, who is also a lawyer and a disabled veteran posted at his site today that John MCCain's brain cancer is an Agent Orange cancer, suggesting it is presumptive, which is not a fact.

A recent CAVC case was vacated for a widow whose Vietnam vet husband had glioblastoma, the same type of cancer John McCain was recently diagnosed with.

The decision is not precedent -setting.

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/02/prweb5080394.htm

Other veterans ( and their survivors as this is a deadly type of cancer) have succeeded in AO awards for glioblastoma and there are many links  ,googable , to any vet with this serious type of cancer who was exposed to AO.

If anyone here needs to use my search feature ,much more will pop up:

www.google.com/search?q=glioblastoma+CAVC&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS695US695&oq=glioblastoma+CAVC&aqs=chrome..69i57.6987j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=va+links+brain+cancer+to+agent+orange+exposure+in+recent+court+decision

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

As always, there's a chance I could be wrong. Senator Mccain served as a Navel Pilot stationed aboard an Aircraft Carrier in the S China Sea. He was shot down over North Vietnam and spent his  POW imprisonment in the North. Consequently no "Boots on the Ground" in South Vietnam.

If that's the case, there's no AO Exposure presumptive involved with his Cancer.

Semper Fi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

Right- but my point was that anyone reading Krause's  article might think glioblastoma is a presumptive AO cancer.

 

And of course trying to get compensation for it  is certainly not on the Senator's mind.

But I would love to represent him if he did file a claim !!!!! 

I would fight over the word " anywhere" in the regulations and make the point that he never left service and was still in the Navy before ,during, and after his release.

The Agent Orange  regulations do not differentiate between North and South Vietnam. They do not confine "set foot in" to anywhere below the DMZ.

 

591 POWs were released during Operation Homecoming in 1973.

The “Hanoi Taxi”- a USAF C 141 , picked 20 of them up at Gia  Lam airport The Hanoi Hilton POWs,

others were sent to South Vietnam ( Saigon) where a C-9 A picked them up.

It was days away from the Paris Peace Accord deadline when the " Kissinger Twenty" - the POWs at Hanoi Hilton were released. March 1973. TV cameras rolled as they walked past their captors to the USAF Officers waiting for them. Mc Cain hobbled up to an officer and pointed to one of the Hanoi Prison guards and said on live TV, "That guy is one of the bastards who tortured me!"

In those days bad words never got on TV but his comment was not censored.

In my opinion, although he could hardly walk from his injuries, and might have used  a crutch when he first came out of the Hilton, Mc Cain certainly did have both feet on Vietnamese soil that day , -and the regulations do not cite South Vietnam only.

 

"For the purposes of VA compensation benefits, Veterans who served anywhere in Vietnam between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975 are presumed to have been exposed to herbicides, as specified in the Agent Orange Act of 1991.

Service in Vietnam means service on land in Vietnam or on the inland waterways of Vietnam. This includes Veterans who:

Set foot in Vietnam (This includes brief visits ashore, such as when a ship docked to the shore of Vietnam or when a ship operated in Vietnam's close coastal waters for extended periods and crew members went ashore, or smaller vessels from the ship went ashore with supplies or personnel. The Veteran further must provide a statement of personally going ashore.)

Served on a ship while it operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam"

https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/locations/vietnam.asp

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines