Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0

Continued Exams- Please review for details


Here is the most recent CT Exam 






Adm: 6/6/2017, D/C: 6/6/2017

CT Chest Abdomen And Pelvis Wo Contrast]

Resulted: 06/06/17 1617, Result status: Final


Ordering provider:

Resulted by: MD

Performed: 06/06/17 1522 - 06/06/17 1539 Resulting lab: SVB STRESS SERVICES



EXAM DATE AND TIME: 6/6/2017 3:22 PM

INDICATION: Lung mass. Vascular disorder of the kidneys.

TECHNIQUE: Routine CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis without IV

contrast. Dose reduction techniques were employed.

COMPARISON: None available.



Lungs: Evaluation lung bases is hindered by extensive respiratory

motion artifact. There is patchy left greater than right bilateral

lower lobe consolidations, consistent with pneumonia and/or

atelectasis. The upper lobes appear clear.

Mediastinum/Hila: There is mild cardiomegaly. Aortic valvular

calcifications are noted. Calcified plaque is seen in the aortic arch.

No mediastinal or hilar adenopathy. Tracheostomy tube appears in

satisfactory position.

Pleura: Tiny left pleural effusion.

Chest Wall: Right-sided VP shunt catheter is seen in the subcutaneous

right anterior chest wall, terminating in the right upper quadrant of

the abdomen.


Liver: Normal size and homogeneous, without focal suspicious

parenchymal lesion.

Gallbladder/Bile Ducts: Few tiny calcified gallstones are seen

layering in the gallbladder, which otherwise appears unremarkable.

There is no biliary dilation.

Pancreas: The pancreas appears normal.

Spleen: The spleen appears normal.

Adrenals: The adrenal glands appear normal.

Kidneys: 3.3 cm simple left upper pole renal cyst. No hydronephrosis

or nephrolithiasis.

Bowel: Numerous colonic diverticuli are noted, without CT evidence of

acute diverticulitis.

Mesentery/Omentum/Peritoneum: The mesentery, omentum and peritoneum

appear normal.

Lymph Nodes: Lymph nodes appear normal. No adenopathy.

Vessels: Calcified plaque in the abdominal aorta, without evidence of


Abdominal Wall: The abdominal wall appears normal.

PELVIS: Unremarkable urinary bladder. Unremarkable prostate gland. No

free air. No free fluid.

Printed on 6/8/2017 9:37 AM Page 1


200 Exempla Cir

Lafayette CO 80026


MRN: S0406306

DOB: 2/28/1940, Sex: M

Adm: 6/6/2017, D/C: 6/6/2017

CT Chest Abdomen And Pelvis Wo Contrast [213904399]


Resulted: 06/06/17 1617, Result status: Final


BONES: Multilevel degenerative changes in the lumbar spine are noted.

No destructive bony lytic or sclerotic osseous lesion.


1. Patchy bilateral lower lobe left greater than right

consolidations, possibly representing atelectasis and/or pneumonia.

Evaluation of these regions are hindered by extensive respiratory

motion artifacts. Underlying mass, while considered less likely cannot

entirely be excluded. Follow-up chest CT suggested after resolution of

acute symptoms.

2. Right-sided VP shunt apparently in satisfactory position, tip

terminating right upper quadrant.

3. Cholelithiasis, without CT evidence of acute cholecystitis.

4. Diverticulosis, without CT evidence of acute diverticulitis.



6/6/2017 4:17 PM

Contributed By:


What do you see in this report? 

as compared to the initial finding in February?


02/19/2017 6:16 PM

Ordered By:

, MD

Result Status:

Final result




About This Test

The My Chart portal may not provide a complete representation of the laboratory test results in your medical record. 
If you have questions, please contact your physician. If the report is not complete, you may contact Health Information Management for a complete report.

·        Details


76M. Diarrhea. Noncontrast CT abdomen and pelvis with coronal
and sagittal reformats.
Mild basilar atelectasis.
Mild cardiomegaly.
Right abdominal ventriculoperitoneal shunt partially seen
extending along the liver.
Dependent cholelithiasis without pericholecystic inflammation.
Unremarkable spleen, adrenals, pancreas.
Retroperitoneal lipomatosis with mildly atretic kidneys.
Left renal 3.3 cm hypodense lesion with indeterminate density.
Diffuse fluid-filled stomach, small bowel, and large bowel
without evidence of obstruction compatible with infectious
gastroenteritis/enterocolitis and diarrhea.
Normal appendix, axial image 64.
Distal colonic diverticulosis without diverticulitis.
Central mesenteric misty appearance with subcentimeter lymph
Unremarkable bladder.
No free fluid or free air.
Small fat-containing inguinal hernia is without inflammation.
Bowel seen immediately deep to the umbilicus.
No acute osseous finding.
1. Diffuse fluid-filled stomach and bowel compatible with
infectious gastroenteritis or enterocolitis.
2. Indeterminate left renal 3.3 cm lesion, most, a hyperdense
cyst. Recommend all sound further evaluate if not stable on
prior exams.
3. Cholelithiasis.
4. Central mesenteric misty appearance with subcentimeter lymph
nodes most commonly associated with mesenteric panniculitis or
sclerosing mesenteritis. Consider 6 month follow-up CT abdomen.


Component Results

There is no component information for this result.

General Information


02/19/2017 7:02 PM


02/19/2017 7:02 PM

Ordered By:


Result Status:

Final result

Help Please!!!!

Blood Testing

KAPPA LIGHT CHAIN, FREE, SERUM Reference Range: 3.3-19.4 (mg/L)     Actual  41.3 H

LAMBDA LIGHT CHAIN, FREE, SERUM Reference Range: 5.7-26.3 (mg/L)  Actual   24.2
KAPPA/LAMBDA LIGHT CHAINS FREE WITH RATIO, SERUM Reference Range: 0.26-1.65  Actual   1.71 H


DOB: 02/28/1940
Sex: M
Patient ID: 
Age: 77
Specimen: KS400824A
Requisition: 7737005
Report Status: FINAL / SEE REPORT
Collected: 05/31/2017 17:19
Received: 06/02/2017 06:23
Reported: 06/09/2017 05:21
Client #: 70300946

Quest, Quest Diagnostics, the associated logo, Nichols Institute, Interactive Insights and all associated Quest Diagnostics marks are the registered trademarks of Quest Diagnostics. All third party marks - '®' and '™' - are the
property of their respective owners. Privacy policy can be found at: http://questdiagnostics.com/home/privacy-policy/online-privacy.html. © 2017 Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. All rights reserved.

These results have been sent to the person that ordered the tests. Your receipt of these results should not be viewed as medical advice and is not meant to
replace discussion with your doctor or other healthcare professional.
Performing Sites
AMD Quest Diagnostics/Nichols Chantilly-Chantilly VA, 14225 Newbrook Drive, Chantilly, VA 20151-2228 Laboratory Director: Patrick W Mason M.D.,PhD
EZ Quest Diagnostics/Nichols SJC-San Juan Capistrano,, 33608 Ortega Hwy, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-2042 Laboratory Director: Jon Nakamoto
THYROGLOBULIN Reference Range: <0.1 (ng/mL)
Reference range applies to differentiated thyroid
cancer patients following treatment. The presence of
measurable thyroglobulin indicates the presence of
thyroglobulin-producing thyroid tissue. Clinical
correlation is advised.
This test was performed using the Beckman Coulter
Chemiluminescent method. Values obtained from
different assay methods cannot be used interchangeably.
Thyroglobulin levels, regardless
of value, should not be interpreted as absolute
evidence of the presence or absence of disease.
This Thyroglobulin antibody test was performed
using the Beckman Coulter Immunoenzymatic method.
Values obtained from different assay methods cannot be
used interchangeably. Thyroglobulin antibody levels,
regardless of value, should not be interpreted as
absolute evidence of the presence or absence of
If the sample contains anti-thyroglobulin antibodies
of greater than 1 IU/mL, the presence of these
autoantibodies may cause falsely low thyroglobulin
SEROTONIN, SERUM Reference Range: 56-244 (ng/mL)
This test was developed and its analytical performance
characteristics have been determined by Quest Diagnostics
Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano. It has not been
cleared or approved by FDA. This assay has been validated
pursuant to the CLIA regulations and is used for clinical
10.4 H



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

Ok.  It looks like you will have to speak for him at the hearing, unless you have a representative.  I think the number 1 thing you need to accomplish at the hearing is to view the records, and compare it with YOUR records, to see if VA is "dealing with a full deck".  

If the VA is missing stuff, then request they add the records, hopefully you can just hand them to them.  

     If stuff is missing from your file at VA, then you are getting a "bad" deal, that is, they are dealing from the bottom of the deck.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • 0

Unfortunately,  the portions of the  exam  you posted does not say anything about your caluza elements, and you need those for Service connection for any of these disorders.  Look for these 3 things for service connection:

1.  Current diagnosis.  

2.  In service event or aggravation.

3.  Nexus, or docs statement that your (diagnosis) is "at least as likely as not due to (in service event) while in military service".  

After you get the caluza elements, you can look at "symptoms" to try to determine a rating.  

     These elements may well be in your Cfile.  You need to order a copy of your cfile to see if you have the above documented.     To get your "lung mass" or "kidney disorder" service connected you need the above.  Exception:  Secondary conditions.  If the doc says your "lung mass" or kidney disorder is a result of an already service connected ;condition, you wont need to AGAIN fulfill requirement number 2 above.  That is, if a condition is secondary to a SC condition, you dont need to again document an in service event or aggravation.  

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Bronco Vet thank you.   Here are the DBQ's done recently showing the diagnosis, also the IME, and I have affidavits signed by other vets attesting to seeing and breathing the heavy spraying, and a letter from the Col who was in charge of the Public Works Department that says they were using 2,4,5,T,Chlordane, Lindane,Malathion, Diasinon, DDT,DDE, and Nicotine Sulfate, throughout the base, and a fellow soldier in the same  unit in Germany on the HIDAL Subkit spraying at the border DBQ's for VA review.docx we were stationed. The Industrial Hygiene Survey that was done at the exact time I was there, that showed extensive levels of carbon monoxide and diesel fumes (benezene and other particulates), as well as noise levels all without protection and inexcess of limits,

This coupled with the above

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

The documents state that you "are unable to speak", and confined to a wheelchair with a stroke, that is, unless I read this incorrectly.  You also have CAD.   However, still missing from the documents you posted are at least 2 of the Caluza Elements necessary for service connection.  

The 3 Caluza elements are:

1.  Current diagnosis.  You apparently have that.  

2.  In service event or aggravation.  This is not documented in the documents you posted. 

3.  Nexus, or medical opinion that your diagnosis is "at least as likely as not" due to an in service event.  Again, I did not see a nexus in the documents you posted.  It could be in other parts of your file.  

     You need to order your cfile and see if all of the above are documented.  Im also more than a little disappointed your doctor seemed to suggest it does not affect your working.  How many people do you see out there working who are confined to a wheel chair and unable to speak???  Not many.  

      My opinion is that if you have, or can get documented all of these caluza elements you should be rated at 100%, and probably with SMC S or even SMC L.  (aid and attendance).  If you are confined to a wheel chair and cant speak, then you need some help, and probably can not leave your house alone.  

Edited by broncovet

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I believe the DBQ's show the diagnosis. As well as the private records. There were error in the PA statements that I have already asked VA to ammend. First he is on continuous oxygen, and he has proxyimal a fib, and he has private ekg that showed a  AV Block on its readings twice, that they dont want to address. And because of the recurring infections, the damage to his lungs f rom exposures well documented and statements from many others about them. I believe we have all three. I have a nexus as well from IME , that states the stroke was caused due to hypertension that was shown in his service medical records. He also has arteriosclerosis, and he had a rupture due to weakened vessels due to hypertension. He also had a huge clot removed from the cerebellum as well as hemorrhaging. I am just wondering what else can be given or angle of attack here.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:



        • Thanks

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines