Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

Question

Yes I am there. My appeal only took eight months. In October , 2015, I was awarded loss of use of a hand and a foot and got the vehicle grant w/adaptive equipment and the SAH grant. I appealed that decision because upon any new 100% grant the VA is obligated by statute to consider A&A as an inferred issue and they failed to do that.

In December 2015, I appealed the decision because A&A was not considered as an inferred issue. My contention was,  I was awarded SMC "L" for loss of use of two extremities in the decision.  Had the VA considered A&A as an inferred issue at the time of that decision as they should have, I would have qualified for regular A&A. An A&A award is also a SMC"L" award. According to 38 CFR 3.350 and USC 1114 if you are entitled to two separate ratings between L and N you qualify for the "O" award. In my case I have two awards at SMC L that qualify for SMC "O". The A&A automatically goes to the R-1 rating if you obtain the prerequisite "O".

I got eight months retro but will appeal the decision for an earlier effective date of January 2011, the date that the loss of use claim was filed. More later.

Edited by jamescripps2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This is great news James, I hope other veterans read up on some of your post that is eligible  any type of SMC.

Good Work!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

I don't mind telling you that my strategy and resultant award was in large part due to some excellent advice given to me by Alex Gram, aka Asknod. The whole thing played out and is documented over on the SMC "M" thread. There are not many people who understand the SMC regulations enough to carry on a decent conversation on the subject but Alex has a pretty good handle on it. Thanks a million Mr. Alex Gram, you make a difference!

Without a call to the Veterans Whitehouse Hotline I would still be waiting for my appeal to be certified to the BVA. I owe Mr. Trump for that one!.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Good job (again) Alex...and Mr. Trump.  My question is why did it take so long to have a "white house Hotline" for Vets?  Most of the problems we see here are hardly new, and VA should have provided their own "custormer service hotline" so the white house does not have to.  

To have to call the white house for action reflects exceptionally poorly on the VA.  They should be embarrassed when the president has to intervene, it indicates the agency is lacking in doing it themselves.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

My father gave me one piece of advice that I've borne well, I hope, James.

"Son, you haven't experienced life until you have done something for someone with no thought of recompense."

While I'll never fill his shoes, his actions and words inspire me every day. I'm very honored to be entrusted to do what I do. 

 

Lt. Gen. G. M. Graham.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

My August 2017 grant was for SMC "O" and  A&A at R-1. It was a partial RO grant on my appeal. In the appeal I asked for the "O" and R-1 with a effective date of Jan 1, 2012, that being the date of the claim.

I did not claim A&A when I filed the 2012 claim. My contention is that the VA is mandated to consider and infer A&A upon any new 100% grant. If A&A needs to be developed based upon the evidence then the rater should invite the evidence to support the claim as it is the duty of the rater to maximize benefits. In the decision of December 2012, I was granted loss of use of a hand and a foot at SMC "M". I was granted the automobile grant with adaptive equipment and the SAH grant. A&A was not invited, considered or inferred by the rater upon that decision.

My contention is that A&A should have been considered, invited and inferred based upon my profound heart disabilities at the time of the earlier decision. Lately, August 2017, I was awarded the "O" and A&A at R-1 based solely upon heart disease. My heart disease that the A&A grant was based upon in the 2017 grant is exactly as it was in 2012 when the claim was filed, nothing has changed. My cardiologist states that there is no significant change between nuke stress test of 2012 and 2017.

I was paid retro for eight months instead of the sixty eight months that would have been due if the mandated A&A had been inferred in the earlier decision as I contend that it should have.

I have been given the option of withdrawing the request for the earlier effective date or doing nothing thereby letting the claim be certified to the Board and the EED date be adjudicated by the BVA.

Heart problems alone, in evidence of my C file and as noted in my VAMC records at the date of both the earlier decision of 2012 and latter decision of 2017 are as follows.

Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, Hyperlipidemia, Warfarin indicated, Biventricular automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Chronic atrial fibrillation, ischemic congestive cardiomyopathy, Ventricular Tachycardia, Post CAGB 1997 and implanted stents. 

I think that I need to let it ride and take my chances of an EED at the BVA. It may not take too long with the President having signed the Appeals Modernization legislation today.

Any ideas or opinions on my chances of winning the issues of A&A as an inferred issue and the EED as a result would be welcome. Retro, if I win would be paid for 68 months vs 8 months as it now stands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines