Okay ... got my denial letter today. I am totally blown away, but not surprised.
The V.A. has lost six months ... SIX months of physical therapy records.
These records prove that the condition from my DoD rated service-connected injury persisted after I was discharged.
As well as the fact that that they, at that time, rated it at zero percent.
Five years later, I was on and off homeless and my knee gave out on me again, tearing ligaments. However this time, I was told that it was that it was the 'natural course' of my Recurrant Sublexing Patellar. AND this time my zero percent was taken away. Wouldn't one think, if previously diagnosed with "RECURRANT" sublextion and there was currently a diagnosis of torn ligaments that the injury has NOT repaired itself? :o
Because of my homelessness, I moved around a lot and have no idea if there was a chance to disagree with this finding. but it is something I clearly have to deal with today, as this 'life long' injury has effected my employment and my knee and back are only going to get worse.
So ... moving forward, I have an appointment with my RO to review my C-File this week! I was impressed with that, but not sure what I may glean. I am told the only way I can get a complete copy is if I submit a FOIA, and it can take several months, depending on the file. But I can get individual copies and hope to get some info on the 1980 decision.
I got the appointment through the 1-800#.
If this would be as simple is showing the VA had a CUE in 1980 should I go for a DRO because it will take less time? And then later file for retro, if I can prove my case?
Or does it appear that I am SOL?
:(
Original thread: I've been service connected since 1975 and haven't received a dime
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.
Question
WomanMarine
Okay ... got my denial letter today. I am totally blown away, but not surprised.
The V.A. has lost six months ... SIX months of physical therapy records.
These records prove that the condition from my DoD rated service-connected injury persisted after I was discharged.
As well as the fact that that they, at that time, rated it at zero percent.
Five years later, I was on and off homeless and my knee gave out on me again, tearing ligaments. However this time, I was told that it was that it was the 'natural course' of my Recurrant Sublexing Patellar. AND this time my zero percent was taken away. Wouldn't one think, if previously diagnosed with "RECURRANT" sublextion and there was currently a diagnosis of torn ligaments that the injury has NOT repaired itself? :o
Because of my homelessness, I moved around a lot and have no idea if there was a chance to disagree with this finding. but it is something I clearly have to deal with today, as this 'life long' injury has effected my employment and my knee and back are only going to get worse.
So ... moving forward, I have an appointment with my RO to review my C-File this week! I was impressed with that, but not sure what I may glean. I am told the only way I can get a complete copy is if I submit a FOIA, and it can take several months, depending on the file. But I can get individual copies and hope to get some info on the 1980 decision.
I got the appointment through the 1-800#.
If this would be as simple is showing the VA had a CUE in 1980 should I go for a DRO because it will take less time? And then later file for retro, if I can prove my case?
Or does it appear that I am SOL?
:(
Original thread: I've been service connected since 1975 and haven't received a dime
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
Popular Days
Aug 14
3
Top Posters For This Question
WomanMarine 2 posts
Gastone 1 post
Popular Days
Aug 14 2017
3 posts
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now