Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Prostate cancer and agent orange

Rate this question


panseyjam

Question

My husband previously was seen in 2012 by a VA MD for the Agent Orange registry.  In 2015 he was diagnosed and rated for DMII related to Agent Orange.  We now attempted to file an online FDC for his newly diagnosed prostate cancer and quickly received a response requiring a medical opinion  the relating his prostate cancer to dioxin.  I called the 800 help number and the individual advised we just go ahead and ask our MD for the opinion, it being quicker and easier to just get the opinion.  Is there a better way to resolve this, either for our future reference or for others.  Seems insane.  Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Sounds like you got bum information from the VARO who sent you the letter requiring a "medical opinion" for prostrate cancer.  

Also, the VA employee you talked to apparently does not know the rules and regulations relating to exposure to agent orange.

Easy way to resolve this is to point out prostrate cancer is one of the presumptive diseases caused by agent orange.

What VARO are you dealing with?     You should not have to get an IMO for prostrate cancer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks, that is what we thought and were surprised with the answer from claims support person.  We did request a note from my husband's physician but in the meanwhile the  VA site changed, now stating there were no longer any requests for additional documentation.  Despite advising us to submit the MD info, the claims person had said it would be forwarded to the supervisor as it didn't make sense, but that it may take a couple days.  Hopefully this is now resolved.  Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thomas is correct, with incountry service-Vietnam, he has a "presumptive" disability.

Maybe you should send IRIS a complaint. Use the initials in the alphabetic code on the right hand side of the letter after the Re: (if they still do it that way)

because that is the last person who handled your claim.

I think VA is definitely under the gun for the backlog and might be training more people to do the job....

But dont feel bad- they denied my AO IHD death claim with a letter that said the veteran's SMRs revealed no IHD.

I said "WTF" in the most diplomatic way I could,  via a CUE claim within an IRIS complaint (reminding them that many Vietnam vets were still practically kids in Vietnam and it would be highly unlikely any of them had heart disease at that point.)and they quickly re did the claim and awarded.My husband was only 18 when he went to the Nam.(USMC 65-66)

I am concerned that if VA does add more AO presumptives in November, this  kind of crap might happen to many vets again.

I also wonder if literacy is a qualification to work at a VARO.  

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My husband checked his benefit site today and now has 100% disability for prostate cancer-agent orange related.  Berta is probably right, a newbie as was so blatantly wrong.  Perhaps the phone support person's  'supervisor' researched it and removed the request before much reaction, and fast tracked the claim.  Done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use