Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
4MAC

Rating of spinal injuries

Question

I received compensation for a cervical spinal injury, but the injury to my lumbar spine was never rated. Should I file a claim for this injury also?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If you choose to file, it might be worth doing your homework first. It can help you get a step ahead.

The thoracolumbar segment is rated independently of your cervical segment, so you can have separate ratings for each.

If your cervical was recently rated, it might be worth it to look at the C&P examination results. They might have also done a workup on your lumbar.

Below is a link to §4.71a   Schedule of ratings—musculoskeletal system

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?rgn=div5;node=38:1.0.1.1.5#se38.1.4_171a

You will have to scroll down a bit to get to the actual spine rating table. It helps to learn about the criteria ahead so you are aware of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

The easiest way is to claim your lumbar/thoracic  secondary to your cervical.  You will not get the earlier date of your cervical claim, but you do not have to prove service connection.

How old is you cervical claim?

This works for me x3,  my lumbar/thoracic is secondary to my service connected cervical spine.  Both are rated 20% for "Range of Motion".  Also, even though arthritis is only rated 10% it is found by x-ray and it can spread to adjacent joints, etc.  So, if there is any mention of arthritis from your injury, you can work that to other joints when they start to give you problems.  Arthritis gets  you in the door, range of motion gets you the bucks.

Hamslice

 

Edited by Hamslice
damn spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Do you also have notes in your service medical records for a lumbar condition? If you are not too old, using arthritis for secondary might not work. It could take years for arthritis from the cervical joints to spread that far. If the secondary is not an option, then look at the direct connection. There has to be an incident causing the condition during active duty service, and a current diagnosis of the same or related condition. Finally there must be a nexus, or a link, between the two. If you do have a significant notation on a lumbar issue in your service medical file it may be the way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines