I uploaded (last week) some of the decisions my late husband had gotten and Berta spotted a couple CUEs and gave me some help in drafting them. Berta if you are able to help with a few more questions Please?
I have only 2 more days till my year is up from the DIC/Accrued benefits claim where DIC was awarded and Accrued denied saying there aren't any. At that time also, I intended Substitution but the VA form got separated (my fault) and didn't get submitted. I, however, wrote it into the 21-534EZ form and checked it. I also included a cover letter that said explicitly I was substituting for any and all accrued benefits... They didn't address substitution in their decision. Now with the CUEs which aren't an accrued yet, do I need to address those 2 forms immediately before the deadline?
Here are some questions I still have if you could clarify these for me please:
A.Is a NOD for accrued benefits claimed with DIC a year ago needed – to appeal their conclusion that there are no accrued benefits? Would any backpay from these CUEs be considered accrued benefits that I would have to NOD the decision now for?
B.Is Substitution needed to do CUE claims or to receive any backpay on them?
C.What happens when future presumptions of ao are added to the list going forward (as a surviving spouse) does it affect anything I can act on?
1.Conditions claimed before – either rated or denied sc
2.Would conditions listed in the C-File but never claimed come into play ever as a presumptive?
D.If CUE is successful:
1.then qualifying for housebound or A&A will need to be judged and evidence has never been presented before…
a.does the judgement come only from the C-File?And if so, should I include printouts from C-File to bring attention to issues pertaining to them?
b.Can any evidence be added (from that date and before) since it was never considered before?And if so, do I include it with the CUE claim?
E.IHD was first decided as 30% and went back to one year prior to our first claim – effective 2004…the bump up to 60% was effective.But the 100% was effective 2006…Should any of those effective dates be different because:
1.SSDI was in place for IHD qualification date of 12/2000
2.TDIU decision being effective 2006 (but he was unemployable per SSDI in 2000?)
3.100% decision?
4.100% effective date adjusted back due to Nehmer 2010 addition listing it as a presumptive
5.Combination of all the above?
F.Many of the evidence documents we submitted are not in the C-File and none of the forms we submitted are there to prove what we submitted or said.Is that normal?
G.Also, the only SS docs in the C-File are the ones where I outline his conditions and behaviors in answer to the many questions on the intake paperwork for that SS claim.There’s 4 pages of handwritten (including along margins due to space shortage)that I doubt anyone is going to wade through but it’s filled with problems he was having.Should I type it all out and attach it to the handwritten forms?
H.We submitted the whole SS file but can’t prove it.We even wrote a letter to our Congressman to help us get a particular letter sent to us by SS along with their decision listing a myriad of restrictions to employment they concluded for him.I couldn’t find it and neither could SS but the Congressman did try for us. I have those communications too, but don’t want to drown them in paperwork with this claim.Any thoughts?
Again, thank you Berta. I did try the other people you suggested without success.
And thank you to everyone here who has helped me or does going forward!
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.
Question
Persistant
I uploaded (last week) some of the decisions my late husband had gotten and Berta spotted a couple CUEs and gave me some help in drafting them. Berta if you are able to help with a few more questions Please?
I have only 2 more days till my year is up from the DIC/Accrued benefits claim where DIC was awarded and Accrued denied saying there aren't any. At that time also, I intended Substitution but the VA form got separated (my fault) and didn't get submitted. I, however, wrote it into the 21-534EZ form and checked it. I also included a cover letter that said explicitly I was substituting for any and all accrued benefits... They didn't address substitution in their decision. Now with the CUEs which aren't an accrued yet, do I need to address those 2 forms immediately before the deadline?
Here are some questions I still have if you could clarify these for me please:
A. Is a NOD for accrued benefits claimed with DIC a year ago needed – to appeal their conclusion that there are no accrued benefits? Would any backpay from these CUEs be considered accrued benefits that I would have to NOD the decision now for?
B. Is Substitution needed to do CUE claims or to receive any backpay on them?
C. What happens when future presumptions of ao are added to the list going forward (as a surviving spouse) does it affect anything I can act on?
1. Conditions claimed before – either rated or denied sc
2. Would conditions listed in the C-File but never claimed come into play ever as a presumptive?
D. If CUE is successful:
1. then qualifying for housebound or A&A will need to be judged and evidence has never been presented before…
a. does the judgement come only from the C-File? And if so, should I include printouts from C-File to bring attention to issues pertaining to them?
b. Can any evidence be added (from that date and before) since it was never considered before? And if so, do I include it with the CUE claim?
E. IHD was first decided as 30% and went back to one year prior to our first claim – effective 2004…the bump up to 60% was effective . But the 100% was effective 2006…Should any of those effective dates be different because:
1. SSDI was in place for IHD qualification date of 12/2000
2. TDIU decision being effective 2006 (but he was unemployable per SSDI in 2000?)
3. 100% decision?
4. 100% effective date adjusted back due to Nehmer 2010 addition listing it as a presumptive
5. Combination of all the above?
F. Many of the evidence documents we submitted are not in the C-File and none of the forms we submitted are there to prove what we submitted or said. Is that normal?
G. Also, the only SS docs in the C-File are the ones where I outline his conditions and behaviors in answer to the many questions on the intake paperwork for that SS claim. There’s 4 pages of handwritten (including along margins due to space shortage) that I doubt anyone is going to wade through but it’s filled with problems he was having. Should I type it all out and attach it to the handwritten forms?
H. We submitted the whole SS file but can’t prove it. We even wrote a letter to our Congressman to help us get a particular letter sent to us by SS along with their decision listing a myriad of restrictions to employment they concluded for him. I couldn’t find it and neither could SS but the Congressman did try for us. I have those communications too, but don’t want to drown them in paperwork with this claim. Any thoughts?
Again, thank you Berta. I did try the other people you suggested without success.
And thank you to everyone here who has helped me or does going forward!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
3
2
Popular Days
Aug 17
8
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 3 posts
Persistant 3 posts
broncovet 2 posts
Popular Days
Aug 17 2017
8 posts
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now