Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

FDC completed in less than 60 days! in 1 year 0-80%

Rate this question


Raza2009

Question

Good morning. I just wanted to post something positive for a change. I submitted a PTSD claim last year and was approved in less than 6 months at 50%. I then turned around and filed a claim on 20 Jun 17 for my neck and back issues. As of 17 Aug 17 my claim is complete and I am now at 80%. I received 20% for my neck and 40% for my back.

 

I know I may be doing this the slow way but I am finding by reading all the posts out there that if the VA has too much too look at for rating they seem to be low balling people like they are overwhelmed at what they have to look at.

 

I am going to now file my claim for fibromyalgia secondary to the neck and back and see how long that takes to get approved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Great news,

 

Glad to hear something went right for someone. Wish you the best and God Bless!!!

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This is Great!

It seems to me (because some hoopla is starting over the new HR 2288 changes to the VCAA)

that it is to a veteran's benefit to file a FDC. That means ,like you did, they have to do some leg work first, and send the VA exactly what they need. I think you did it the Fast way and not the slow way!

It will take me some time to read the HR2288 in it's entirety but this is the key issue for many:

"Applicability of duty to assist

(1)

The Secretary’s duty to assist under this section shall apply only to a claim, or supplemental claim, for a benefit under a law administered by the Secretary until the time that a claimant is provided notice of the agency of original jurisdiction’s decision with respect to such claim, or supplemental claim, under section 5104 of this title.

(2)

The Secretary’s duty to assist under this section shall not apply to higher-level review by the agency of original jurisdiction, pursuant to section 5104B of this title, or to review on appeal by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals"

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr2288/text

 

Broncovet states here many times, and it is the best reminder of all, for newbies,the Caluza triangle.

I read BVA cases all the time and it amazes me how many claims get to the BVA and still lack the components of the Caluza triangle.

Then again.... by 2003 I had already become a hardcore VA claimant.

The 2000 VCAA had been in affect when I re opened my death claim.

By then I had realized that no past vet rep has ever helped me at all, and the VCAA letter I got was deficient in every respect. 

So, (I already told this whole scenario here before so will eliminate that part) the BVA awarded the claim in spite of the VCAA violation, which they did verify,  because I had supplied them the exact evidence they needed ( and what a proper VCAA letter would ask for).

I depended solely on myself to gather the probative evidence for my claim.

I guess my point is ,it is common sense for any claimant to seek documented evidence that can establish their inservice nexus and many fail to even try to do that.It is unfortunate that we often have to suggest getting an IMO, that could be costly, but it is also often the only way the nexus can be supported  with a full medical rationale that overcomes any other etiology but for the inservice event, issue, etc etc.

 

But many claims are denied  due to a lack of  significant and probative evidence and the VCAA could never perform a miracle, in that respect, anyhow.

 

 

Edited by Berta
I interopreted the VCAA amendent wrong.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My initial post here was a misinterpretation of the VCAA amendment -SORRY about that....

Now it does not seem as bad as I thought it was.

But Commander Wells has a different take. It will be interesting to see any comments on his statement here.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/336367-va-appeals-reform-bill-strips-due-process-from-veterans

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Congrats, that is great!

May I ask how the back and neck C&P was conducted? I have a C&P coming up and am curious about how the ROM is rated vs Pain? I have limited range of motion due to the constant pain in my lower back, but if forced, I guess I could push my body to limits that causes severe pain. Should I do that when I have my ROM test or state to the DR when the pain occurs and stop? I want to do what is right and I also want the DR to know that I am in constant pain..

This is a SC injury resulting in a bulging Disc while in Iraq in 2004. Service records and buddy statements also confirm this claim.

Thank you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Rodney, all I did was show the truth. He did not have a measurement thing but was an orthopedic surgeon with a specialty in spines. He was very professional and complete. Go as far as the pain allows. Don't fake or exaggerate because they can spot that a mile away. Be honest...if you are meant for a higher rating it will hsppen. All I can suggest from the heart is be honest and true and karma will give you what you deserve.  It's those that fake or exaggerate for the higher ratings that end up losing in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use