Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Accident + Injury secondary disability due to medication intake

Rate this question


tk3000

Question

Hello Folks,


I read in the the past in books or other sources, and it seems that there are fully developed cases and claims within the VA whereby the intake of medication (opioids/pain killers in particular) can supposedly play a substantial roles in an accident with a subsequent injury and disability. While it is true that the medication's prescription warns about such impairment one can not stop living a life or perform basic and necessary tasks (for what there is no substitute) due to such medications.  

It seems reasonable that whether one is riding a motorbike or operating a machinery and  then is victimized by a debilitating accident for which one could argued that the intake of pain killers played a substantial role in the  precipitation or occurrence of the accident, that then one could claim that the injury and disability caused by aforementioned accident shall be service connected as well.  

There are many questions   afloat from this argument, mainly questions of principles and cause/effect, for instance:  in these circumstances, while the burden of the proof lies with the veteran it would not be possible for the VA to prove beyond a reasonable doubt  the intake of medication did not play a role in the accident. 

Could anyone point me out to previous cases or scenarios of this nature, please?  How straightforward  or convoluted such cases can be?

 

Edited by tk3000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Good and Rare Question.

I would say maybe this would fall under  torte claim's? although I'm not sure.

 Miss use of willful misconduct would need to be proven,( non-abuse of medications) blood test taken at the time of accident ,lots of factors factor in here.

However it is possible to get compensation for taking VA pain prescribe medications that was the cause of an accident/and injury.

''When Drug Use Is Willful Misconduct''

''The occasional use of a drug (even if illegal) will not rise to the level of willful misconduct in the absence of a finding that the use of the drug actually caused the injury or death.''

If a prescription drug is taken as prescribed and is used as medically intended, this is not drug abuse even if it results in an addiction to the prescription drug.

source: published by NOLO ''Disability Secrets ''

I would advise to get all your evidence together and everything you need to substantiate your claim and file FDC , and just see what they say?  

(What We Decided) if your denied  then you can use that to appeal your claim if you feel you don't agree with the decision.

 I would advise to use a Experienced VA Attorney or  Experienced VA  Certified Rep.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If it's not to much to ask can you share more details about the accident. The key I think would be the police report and what it is that they said played the role in the accident? I got lots of information of cases but the biggest tool for you to search if your not about sharing exact details is going to BVA.VA.GOV and look up recent decisions and begin your search in their search drive. Exact phrase and using " " with the word AND will help. If you share more info I maybe able to help with more exact cases...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 8/23/2017 at 10:40 AM, Buck52 said:

Good and Rare Question.

I would say maybe this would fall under  torte claim's? although I'm not sure.

 Miss use of willful misconduct would need to be proven,( non-abuse of medications) blood test taken at the time of accident ,lots of factors factor in here.

However it is possible to get compensation for taking VA pain prescribe medications that was the cause of an accident/and injury.

''When Drug Use Is Willful Misconduct''

''The occasional use of a drug (even if illegal) will not rise to the level of willful misconduct in the absence of a finding that the use of the drug actually caused the injury or death.''

If a prescription drug is taken as prescribed and is used as medically intended, this is not drug abuse even if it results in an addiction to the prescription drug.

source: published by NOLO ''Disability Secrets ''

I would advise to get all your evidence together and everything you need to substantiate your claim and file FDC , and just see what they say?  

(What We Decided) if your denied  then you can use that to appeal your claim if you feel you don't agree with the decision.

 I would advise to use a Experienced VA Attorney or  Experienced VA  Certified Rep.

Thanks for the insight. 

I am not sure about it been characterized as a tort claim either. Tort seems to be related to negligence or crime whereas there is intention. 

The medication was used as intended, but I was under more than one type of medication (all from the VA) and they do interact with each other as well.

Yeah, I plan on filing a FDC, but first have to find out the records to properly substantiate the claim and thus increase chances of success. 

I happen to have an appeal at BVA level, and as many of you I heard that the file can only be at one place at a time (must be paper file) so having multiple claims delay all of them. Is that a right assessment?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
18 hours ago, jfrei said:

If it's not to much to ask can you share more details about the accident. The key I think would be the police report and what it is that they said played the role in the accident? I got lots of information of cases but the biggest tool for you to search if your not about sharing exact details is going to BVA.VA.GOV and look up recent decisions and begin your search in their search drive. Exact phrase and using " " with the word AND will help. If you share more info I maybe able to help with more exact cases...

The accident happened in 2008. Back then, I was a student taking classes at MSU (Michigan State University) and with allowance plus financial aid I could barely afford to pay rent and living expenses, so my main of transportation was a motor scooter (used it to go to classes, buy grocery, etc). And it because of my difficulties in mobility and pain, the scooter was a life saver. And the accident happened while riding this bike. Suffice to say, I am not riding motorbikes any longer.

The police report only said that I was riding slowly (witness told officer).

Thanks, I will look into the bva's website for possible similar cases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Well not to long ago a widow came here for help  her bubby was killed riding a Motor Cycle.

OK she  claimed that the medication he was on from VA Prescribe medications for  his S.C. PTSD  was the cause of him having a seizure or blackout at the time of his Accident Although Alcohol was found in is blood after the Accident  but also the medications too!

  so the board could not determine if he had a black out or not at the time of the Accident? ( I believe he was killed instantly) (benefit of doubt goes to the veteran)..even when a witness stated or testified that he was riding recklessly and popping wheeling's  riding on the rear tire with the front end of the motor cycle up in the air at the time of the Accident..I believe she won the case...its here on hadit some place? her post.

 Crucial  medical evidence in this case was the blood test taken after the Accident his Medications he had taken from the VA.& not the Alcohol 

I am not sure how this case went? but if I remember correct she won and recieved DIC.

I can't remember her screen name here on hadit. sorry.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
16 hours ago, tk3000 said:

The accident happened in 2008. Back then, I was a student taking classes at MSU (Michigan State University) and with allowance plus financial aid I could barely afford to pay rent and living expenses, so my main of transportation was a motor scooter (used it to go to classes, buy grocery, etc). And it because of my difficulties in mobility and pain, the scooter was a life saver. And the accident happened while riding this bike. Suffice to say, I am not riding motorbikes any longer.

The police report only said that I was riding slowly (witness told officer).

Thanks, I will look into the bva's website for possible similar cases

And what was the cause of the accident in the police report their words are what the VA will use to make their determination, and if you were in the service and a LIne of duty was done but if your out the police report sounds what they will use. The report should have a breakdown of what happened, the events leading to the accident, and the cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use