Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Accident + Injury secondary disability due to medication intake

Rate this question


tk3000

Question

Hello Folks,


I read in the the past in books or other sources, and it seems that there are fully developed cases and claims within the VA whereby the intake of medication (opioids/pain killers in particular) can supposedly play a substantial roles in an accident with a subsequent injury and disability. While it is true that the medication's prescription warns about such impairment one can not stop living a life or perform basic and necessary tasks (for what there is no substitute) due to such medications.  

It seems reasonable that whether one is riding a motorbike or operating a machinery and  then is victimized by a debilitating accident for which one could argued that the intake of pain killers played a substantial role in the  precipitation or occurrence of the accident, that then one could claim that the injury and disability caused by aforementioned accident shall be service connected as well.  

There are many questions   afloat from this argument, mainly questions of principles and cause/effect, for instance:  in these circumstances, while the burden of the proof lies with the veteran it would not be possible for the VA to prove beyond a reasonable doubt  the intake of medication did not play a role in the accident. 

Could anyone point me out to previous cases or scenarios of this nature, please?  How straightforward  or convoluted such cases can be?

 

Edited by tk3000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 I hear that John999

When I take my pain meds and meds for PTSD  I Never drive anymore,  Dr told me not to &  if I needed go to one of my VA appointments  or grocery store  ect,,,ect,,,get someone to take me  so that's what I DO.

The medications  I take make me black-out at times and also makes me have memory loss, One time I was driving and forgot how to get home...man what a weary feeling that is.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I take most  or all of my medications before bedtime & when I get up in the mornings I can think straight and drive if I need too.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 8/30/2017 at 1:56 PM, john999 said:

I was told by my pain management doctor and shrink at the VA that in Florida if I was impaired due to use of VA meds and got pulled over I would be in trouble.  One thing about some of my pain meds is they affect my coordination even when I take them as directed.  If I had to get out of my car and walk I would be in handcuffs.  I am not impaired mentally but I tend to stumble when under the influence of meds for chronic pain.   Needless to say I obey every traffic law and don't drive late at night when the bars close.  I don't drink alcohol either because I know if I get pulled over I am a dead duck.  Pain meds,  muscle relaxants and anti-anxiety drugs all combine to screw up your ability to walk and keep your balance at least for me they do.  I wonder what antidepressants do to a person's coordination because I take a lot?   I am surprised that any vet who is DUI from drugs or alcohol and has a wreck even if it due to PTSD would get a break from the law or the VA.  I was told by a lawyer not to submit to tests for DUI.  Make them get a warrant to take your blood or urine.  That gives you more time to get straight.   You do lose your license for a year but may avoid a DUI conviction.  My old pain management doctor told me the same thing.

 Sure enough, these medication can have very detrimental side effects. And there may be not only the combined side effects (sum of the parts) when they are combined but even new side effects, so in effect the combined side effects can be larger than the sum of the parts. 

I avoid situations (simply walking a short distance) that cause pain or more intense pain, and live with some pain plus some sporadic and momentaneous sharp spikes of pain rather than taking the pain medications. The MH medication I have to take to avoid withdraw effects and whatnot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 8/30/2017 at 1:03 PM, jfrei said:

Now the police report will have to list what they believed was the cause examples icy conditions defects with road or even issues with the car. Which none of those causes are willful misconduct and if you search on the BVA website for recent decisions in the past 15 years there will be lots of examples. They have to list what was the cause of the ancient if not you may have to hire a forensic investigator if you feel their were other circumstances that caused the accident. Ive done a search for you and came up with 2026 results just a quick check was your Blood sample taken to show your medication levels had they felt that was the caused the crash this would have been taken just my thoughts. Any vehicle accident is hard to prove and usually and sadly the Regional office wont help you and neither will a DRO review I speak of first hand experience with accident and the DRO sent in a question to general counsel who told her to deny. BVA are the only ones to show evidence to give the overall picture of what may caused the accident. I had a line of duty in my favor from my service department, a signed statement that the car had a defect by the manufacture, and a report from the police with a hired forensic investigator showing that my car had a known defect and caused my crash by the police. All that was denied at the regional office. It wasn't until I went to the BVA showing the same evidence I also never had a hearing skipped it.  It was granted there, but file the FDC not to be a negative nancy but to get to the quicker decision and ultimately a quicker route to the BVA. But maybe when you file the FDC if you have the police report and it lists what caused the accident maybe just maybe you could win your case but you have to have all the ducks in your row the VA wont give you an easy time. Another question who or where was the medication from? Was it given in service by your military doctors ? If its not to much to get specific cases what was the drug name? Your answer as the cause of this accident has to be stated in the police report its a part of an accident protocol.

When the accident happened I wasn't in active duty any longer, and all medications came from VA itself. I broke my during the accident, and have had surgery; but I am sure whether or not I had blood work done (and it is done, probably it was done to seek traces of medications in the blood stream). 

At the time I taking pain killers (probably Piroxicam), muscle relaxant (don't remember the name), and mental health medications (also don't recall the names). I will have to do a search within the VA to find out what medications I was taking back then (it has changed so many times). I will go to the police department and seek to obtain a copy of the police report (had one but don't know where it is).

I can guarantee that there was no willful misconduct and I was riding slowly. The throttle cable was slightly accelerated though, and the roads were mostly clear (besides I was used to ride during the winter with not so good roads). The point is  I lost control in the curve, and believe that medication played a major roles in my inability to respond quickly enough to the circumstances.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Get the police report ASAP so we have something to work to give you a better answer. That's were the Willful misconduct determination will come from when the VA does their own LOD or just to rule out willful misconduct. There is where you'll find out what they said about your meds playing any roll in the accident. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Obviously you were not driving wreckless and you'd know if they thought you were intoxicated by any means. Did they do a sobriety check walk a line hop on one foot or whatever? If not then they most likely didn't put DWI as the cause...just a guess not sure what you said caused the accident tired from the night before slow reaction time now I'm just guessing....

Edited by jfrei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use