Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Filing for Hearing Loss & Tinnitus

Rate this question


Ed Ball

Question

Noise and Military Service; Implications for Hearing Loss and Tinnitus (2006) is the Institute of Medicines findings and presentation to the VA Secretary which deals with a lot of history throughout the DOD, addressing such things as "whisper exams" that fail to register the upper frequency ranges or loss thereof which is what Bilateral SNHL is all about. Lack of documentation, and a wealth of other information. Did you know that prior to 1978 a bonafide DOD Hearing Conservation Program to safeguard hearing loss did not exist. One exception the USAF did in fact conduct audiograms on select personnel from the late 50s forward. 

Do not be surprised in your VA Denial letters to find those serving prior to 1978 to have had an audiogram during their induction physical, but a whisper exam upon separation. The VA C&P examiners frequently refer to your hearing being normal upon separation, therefore the military did not cause your hearing loss. The VARO will concede your traumatic acoustic events and further noise environments, but will side with the medical evidence (by law) each and every time. Solution? Private Audiology Medical Opinions, the doctor will review all information in your VA Claims folder, and list the items they reviewed on their office letterhead, with the statement they have reviewed, then have the doctor remark as to "as least as likely as not" (equal to or greater than 50%) or "more likely than not" (greater than 50%) due to traumatic acoustic events endured during his/her military service, followed by medical reasoning as to why. The doctor will date and sign their letter and insert their credentials behind their name. (You may want to request copies of your military treatment records if you don't already have copies in order to challenge the VARO decision)  

Today I get the private medical opinions before submitting the claims. That way if the VA C&P Examiner determines the military didn't cause your hearing loss (negative opinion), I have the Private Medical Opinion (positive) and they cancel each other out. Then the RVSR within VARO is left with reviewing the remaining positive evidence in your claims folder, if available, and provide the veteran the benefit of doubt. 38 U.S. Code § 5107 - Claimant responsibility; benefit of the doubt

Hearing protection devices; there are various designs, based on noise levels in your work environment; that have what are referred to as Noise Reduction Ratings to preclude hearing loss. These did not exist, in my case prior to 1979. Years ago, while in the Navy, I noticed engineers would wear what we called Mickey Mouse ears, to help attenuate the noise in their work space. These items were shared, gaskets wore out after extensive use and personnel continued wearing them without a proper seal. Their workspace would require at least a double flange and ideally a triple flange hearing protection device along with the ear muffs to preclude hearing loss. Problem being, they had to be removed in order to communicate, receive orders in conventional engineering spaces due to noise levels.

News flash! There is no test for Tinnitus. VA will attempt to state otherwise, but the American Tinnitus Association and their very own DOVA JRRD Vol 46, number 5, 2009 pages 619-632 states "Special audiological tests are effective in detecting deliberate exaggeration of hearing loss, but no documented test exists that is capable of detecting the presence or absence of tinnitus." Furthermore, you are authorized to diagnose Tinnitus; for this very reason. Define the traumatic acoustic event you were exposed to that caused your Tinnitus since military service. 105mm Howitzers 185dB, M-16 156dB, flight deck on aircraft carriers 136dB are but just a few areas of impulse noise levels that exceed OSHA 90dB exposure in an eight hour period. 

Here is a further recommendation by Veterans Law Blog:

Draft a Sworn Declaration  do not use VA Form 21-4138 – with the following information: (I've used the 21-4138 with success)

  1. List each and every incident of significant noise exposure you can remember – and give enough detail to show that the exposure was significant and credible Grenade blasts, artillery rounds, simulators, constant machine-gun fire, years around loud jet or tank engines, you get the idea.  Don’t OVERDO it…1-3 sentences should suffice, but identify if you can the approximate month and year of the noise exposure.
  2. State approximately when you remember the tinnitus starting.
  3. If it started in service, explain why you didn’t seek medical treatment in service (for most Veterans, explaining the reality of military service to bureaucrats will suffice: no soldier, sailor, or airmen is going to stop a mission or training to seek treatment for a condition that everybody has and that there is no cure for. True Story).
  4. Identify the chronicity of your tinnitus – has it been continuous since exposure to the noise?  If yes, explain that you have had this ringing since the exposure to noise.
  5. Identify the frequency of your tinnitus – how often do you have ringing in the ears?  Every day? Twice a week? 4 times a month?
  6. Identify the severity of your tinnitus. I think you need only do this if your tinnitus is so severe that it is debilitating, prevents you from working, or in very rare cases, is “objective tinnitus”, meaning it can be heard by other people standing next to you.  In these cases, you might be able to seek an extra-schedular rating for the tinnitus in excess of the 10% limit in the Schedule of Impairment Ratings.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use