Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
SgtE5

Looking For Advise On Adding A Rebuttal To An Appeal

Question

First like to say that anyone that has access to myhealthvet should use the blue button to download your va medical records. I found out they are working on my nod or at least was in 2016.

I filed for compensation for tinnitus June 2015. Was denied in April 2016. Filed a NOD with a imo that stated "more than likely" related to service.

So today I downloaded my medical records from myhealthvet and saw an entry dated March 2016 by the same c&p examiner that said "less likely as not" she now has my str. She didn't at the c&p. She also had the imo I sent in wiith my nod. When I went to see the independent audiologist, I had my complete str with hearing examines during my service. She noted that "His
previous hearing tests were reviewed and revealed normal hearing bilaterally with minimal decline over the years."

But the c&p doctor says in the updated notes from 2016:

"Private Medical Records reviewed:
Audio: 2 Jul 15: Florida Meidcal Clinic:
Mild SNHL AD and normal hearing sensitivity AS with excellent word
recognition scores for AU: Dr. opined that Veteran's current HL and tinnitus
is a result of military noise exposure: (Examiner's note: Dr. did not
have access to Veteran's STRs so Dr. was unable to assess Veteran's
hearing status when Veteran was on active duty)"

The c&p doctor is fixated on without hearing loss, there is no tinnitus. She again states less likely as not in her updated 2016 notes.

My question is should I send in the copy of the updated c&p notes and the imo and highlight where the private doctor states "His
previous hearing tests were reviewed and revealed normal hearing bilaterally with minimal decline over the years."

And while I'm at it, I was giving a tinnitus question & answer pamplet from the va that says "The most common cause of tinnitus exposure to loud noise" Nothing in the pamplet says usually associated with HL. Should I send that in as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

What was your MOS and do you have a CAR Award listed on your DD214?                                                                                                                                                                                                                 How about posting a redacted copy of your Denial Letter, to include the page where the Rater discusses the Reason for the Denial and the Evidence Reviewed.                                                                                                                                                                                                                              If you haven't obtained a copy of the Audiology C & P DBQ from your MHV, do so, redact and post it.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                During your C & P Exam, what did you tell the Clinician regarding the development and progression of your current Tinnitus symptoms?                                                                                                                                  Semper Fi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

 

It would help if you posted a redacted copy of your denial (cover all personal information name claim # ect,,,ect,,)

 If your still in the limitations  with your NOD?

Request a DRO HEARING (ASAP) in your NOD or if you sent your NOD then send in a Request for the DRO Hearing..MAIN THING IS KEEP YOUR APPEAL GOING b/c its been over a Year Since you filed your NOD (Correct?)

You may need to file a Reconsideration. (not sure if your NOD time limit as run out?)

I would go get a private IMO using a specialist  and ask the specialist to read your pertinent medical records from the VA  about your hearing test & what the Audiologist mention.

Let the specialist know what you did in the military and just let him know what the VA Audiologist mention & the C&P Examiner

Ask the specialist to examine you and re test your hearing.

The private test must be done under the VA Guidelines  and use the Maryland CNC Word test. (found here on hadit) the Dr must be license in his state and certified, the specialist can call the your VAMC Audiologist Dept and request in CD the Maryland CNC Word test(about  7 or 8 bucks I think)  your VAMC should have all the test they have performed on you  and its in CD Format.  (and you can request a copy) have the specialist to compare his test with there's.   

 and also state what you stated your MOS was in the military &  as you mention that you do not hunt or been around loud noise since your military service,   then the specialist can give is Impression of his exam  that it is least likely as not your HL & TINNITUS was caused & related to your  military service  to be bilateral   Noise Induced HL and veterans states a rining/ buzz sounds in his head  as this sound is known as Tinnitus, Tinnitus is medically know to be caused from Noise induced hearing loss, and the Dr needs to give a medical reason behind his opinion and his credentials and years of experience.

The specialist can opine all this.

you need to ask the Dr to use these words as this is what the VA likes to use or read as their language

(IS LEAST LIKELY AS NOT) 

Now please realize this is just for service connection, the ## on the Hearing Test Scale will reveal how much hearing loss you actually have and the VA Raters go by a rating chart used especially for HL.

Hearing loss and Tinnitus are in no doubt (in my opinion) the hardest to win in a VA Claim.

Edited by Buck52

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thanks Gastone for the reply.

My mos was 3531 motor vehicle operator. Has a listing in the Duty MOS Hearing Loss Probibility Chart-VA Fast Letter 10-35 as moderate probable exposure to noise. Yes I do have a CAR from Desert Storm. The c&p doctor never asked how long I've had tinnitus. Just what noises I was exposed to and about after military. Funny thing is that in her report, she states I was exposed to explosions.

 

VA Denial.docx

C&P1.pdf

IMO.docx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thanks for the reply Buck. The independent doctor I went to actually interned at the St. Petersburg VA hospital. She read my str hearing tests and va tests. Did her own tests and opined that "more than likely" my tinnitus is related to military. When I filed my NOD in 2016, I asked for a DRO hearing.

The c&p doctor just keeps copying the opinon from the Military Service Implications for Hearing loss and Tinnitus study that was done in 2005.

Rationale for Opinion Given: The induction and separation
audiograms indicate normal hearing bilaterally. There is insufficient evidence from
longitudinal studies in laboratory animals or humans to determine whether
permanent noise-induced hearing loss can develop much later in one's
lifetime, long after the cessation of that noise exposure. Although the
definitive studies to address this issue have not been performed, based on the
anatomical and physiological data available on the recovery process following
noise exposure, it is unlikely that such delayed effects occur".

Reference: 22 Sep
2005 Institute of Medicine's landmark study: Noise & Military
Service: Implications for Hearing loss and Tinnitus.
In the absence of an objectively verifiable noise injury, the
association between claimed tinnitus and noise exposure cannot be assumed to
exist. Tinnitus may occur following a single exposure to high-intensity
impulse noise, long-term exposure to repetitive impulses, long-term
exposure to continuous noise, or exposure to a combination of impulses and
continuous noise. However, you would have to accept the scientifically
unsubstantiated theory that tinnitus occurred as a result of some latent,
undiagnosed noise injury. IOM never stated that tinnitus could result from
undiagnosed noise injuries. In most cases, tinnitus is accompanied by measurable
hearing loss. We recognize that the audiogram is an imperfect measurement.
Nevertheless, it is accepted as the objective basis for determining noise
injuries.

 

Edited by SgtE5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines