Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0

Seeking Opinions


I have ZERO CONFIDENCE that the VARO has any intention to allow a favorable decision on my behalf at a DRO hearing.

The VARO's pattern of ignoring ALL of my favorable evidence, and development to deny my claim has led me to the above conclusion.

Some claims have been denied WITHOUT a C&P exam even though my service treatment records show traumatic injuries happened to me, and I have current medical diagnosis of residual disabilities from those injuries.


If you want a clear drink of water, you have to go to the head of the stream.

The St. Petersburg VARO is taking 3-4 years just for a DRO review. 


It would NOT be logical to wait in line that long for what I'm convinced will be a denial, and then wait ANOTHER three or four years for a chance to get my appeals heard at the BVA level.

The BVA MAY award some of my appeals... but I am certain they will remand some of my appeals back to the VARO for more evidence development in the form of more C&P exams, which the VARO was aware SHOULD have been done to begin with, had they followed the rules in their regulations manual.

It's a vicious cycle(appeals) and I am much aware of why vets have called the disability claims/appeals process a "Hamster Wheel".


I am aware that a DRO review is supposed to be a fresh look.

That is words. 

Words with no substance from where I stand.

Each person has different experiences. 


I don't think my attorney intends to perfect the appeals until AFTER a SOC(VARO denial) is issued.

Once that happens, attorneys must put forth significant effort to win.


I AM aware that some vets have gotten awarded at DRO reviews, but I'm not feeling it will be in my best interest to do so.

Each case is different.


Well here goes......

Edited by 63Charlie

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Ever consider taking it to the Press? If you can find a sympathetic ear, they might do a story on the issue.

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • 0

I can tell you from my experience with the St. Pete RO since 1994. DRO, CUE and all that is usually a waste of time. I never got anywhere with my claims untill they went into appeals and I got a lawyer involved, just pick a good one. A good lawyer will keep your claim out of the AMC, which is a black hole, and will tell you all these hail Mary attempts are just going to add years to your claims. 

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I hate cameras.




My attorney is going to pull the DRO hearing request, stating the results at the St. Pete VARO haven't been so good.

Going to request a SOC to be issued so the form to get me in the BVA waiting line can be filed.

Happy my attorney is going this route.

Edited by 63Charlie
  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

63charlie, sounds like a plan. You probably know this, however, a BVA hearing is always a good thing. I had mine in 2005 at St. Pete. and was able to look my BVA Judge in the eye, state my case and ask questions. This also allowed the inevitable mistakes that are always in the SSOC to be addressed. I don't know if hearings are still done that way but I believe it helped me win my appeal+the lawyer used excerpts from the hearing as evidence that sort of painted the Judge into a corner using her own words.

Good luck on the long haul. Just remember, [and I hope this has not changed either] they had to pay me retro from 1996 when I won the claim in 2009, one year after I finally hired the Lawyer and quite trying to go it alone to save a little bit of money. Anyway, the lawyers don't get the 20% on remands, the Gov. pays for that, and that money  somehow is taken off your final award. I did not explain that very well, but the point is; a good part of the Lawyer's fee will be paid by the VA and not out of your pocket when you win.

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

get the appeal going with the BVA

take some time and get some money together for a good IMO

be ready to hand the new IMO to judge.

file for hardship advancement on docket if you can..

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:



        • Thanks

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines