Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

ATTORNEY FEES

Rate this question


porgee

Question

I REMEMBER Broncovet  said he didn't have to pay no attorney fees out of his decision from CAVC

yet I find this is not correct. If you win an EED of a claim for 2-3 years retro how is it that an 

attorney get paid more than a vet with an attorney with 15 years of retro without paying. 6 GRAND 

IS GOOD FOR SOMEONE that work a case for less than a year at the job.  Yet a veteran gets 175 grand and the CAVC

COST IS $1600.00 for attorney at the CAVC HOW IS THIS ???. Anybody. I WON 175,000 retro ATTORNEY FEE WAS 

$1600.00 at CAVC plus 20% of the retro. I guess every case is different.

Edited by porgee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

When a Vet's lawyer prevails at the CAVC either with a Remand or an outright Award, he then petitions the Court for Legal fees. The CAVC Awarded Fees are paid to the Lawyer by the VA, they don't come out of the Vet's Award or Retro. 

In the instance of a Remand (CAVC Remands are considered Wins as far as Legal Fees are concerned), it doesn't matter if the Vet prevails on the Remand, the Lawyer gets paid by the VA regardless.

A friend got $7k late 16 on an ED Remand, his CAVC lawyer collected like $18K early 16 directly from the VA based on the CAVC Awarded Legal Fees. Not a bad payday, right.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

you got that right that's a darn god pay day. I just don't get it still . My attorney

been on my case a while and when I got the break down of the fees he charge me 

and the fees he got from CAVC is no where near 18k or even 6k they paid him $1600.00

for his time at CAVC and this was taken off. I have never heard an attorney get 18K from

the VA if that's the case attorneys may a lot of money from VA. HE gets 18k and the vets get 

7k out of the award. I just don't believe that is correct or somebody done lied to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

VA pays an attorney 18k for a 7k award to the vet, that's hard to believe

and that just don't sound right about VA paying that much for an argument 

written up by the attorney because most don't go to court or that's what I been told.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Ok.  Again, its correct.  The cavc often awards attorney fees to successful claimants at the cavc level, to be paid by eaja.  The attorney can not collect eaja fees 

and also from the claimant, except to the extent that the fee agreement exceeds attorney fees. 

Your attorney has to ask for eaja fees, so you need to tell him to request same.  They may not care whether the money comes from you or eaja, and its likely easier to collect from you.  My attorney requested and got eaja fees without me asking, but your attorney may not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

 

 

Eaja fees are often paid even when there is a remand, especially if its a JMR.  You see, with a remand, the v'a is admitting to a mistake so eaja fees are applicable.  

If you get a remand, and later, get money when the remand is completed, your eaja fees should be deducted from your total attorney fees.  Ask your attorney about eaja fees.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

 

 

Eaja fees are often paid even when there is a remand, especially if its a JMR.  You see, with a remand, the v'a is admitting to a mistake so eaja fees are applicable.  

If you get a remand, and later, get money when the remand is completed, your eaja fees should be deducted from your total attorney fees.  Ask your attorney about eaja fees.  

Eaja fees are generally awarded at the cavc level, not at the bva.  If you hire an attorney to represent you at the bva its unlikey for you to get eaja fees, as the bva does not award them, tho I dont know why.  

As I explained, the best time to hire an attorney is with a bva denial appealing to the cavc, as that is the time when you are likely to get eaja fees.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Bubbleboy929 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use