Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C-File, does RO's claims specialist opinion / interpretation of evidence, appear in C-File?

Rate this question


MKAH

Question

Just wondering, does the RO's claims specialist opinion / interpretation of evidence, appear in C-File?


Thank You

Former, EFMB Combat Medical Specialist  
SC Tinnitus 10%, SC Hearing Loss 50%, SMC-K
SC Headaches (Migraines) 50%, SC PTSD 70% adjusted down to ZERO %  by RO
Total SC = 80% (VA Math)

USARMYPIC.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

The VARO might be missing the  word "or" in the rating schedule.

I think it is disgraceful that these farmed out exams become the 'property' of the VA until a decision is made., unlike C & Ps done at a VAMC.

It takes away the right of any veteran to be able to prepare a timely rebuttal to a faulty exam.

I wish more vets would complaint to the Secretary about this.

I think all you can do is wait for the decision, at this point, and if it is legally erroneous, there is potential that you could ask them to call CUE on themselves....... As it might end up being a violation of 38 CFR 4.6, explained in the link....

https://community.hadit.com/topic/60717-the-power-of-38-cfr-46/#gsc.tab=0

The CUE I mentioned there I had filed, and was pending, was awarded not long after I posted this older reply.

It was regarding a HBP claim under 1151, and the VARO failed to consider my sole piece of evidence- which came  from VA Central Office, their head cardiologist, who is also an expert in HBP. I raised hell and they awarded.

There is more to this tactic if you search for GCY VA, (Go CUE Yourself VA ) which has worked for me and a few others here.

------I just realised this might have been a VAMC C & P exam????

therefore it should not take too long to get........maybe....

I have mentioned this MANY times here----

Do not use FOIA for  medical records that belong to you.....lawyers might use it in your behalf but they are not the claimant nor the person the medical records involve.

5 USC 552 covers the Privacy Act, as well as FOIA.

I have used both but never FOIA for anything to do with my husband's medical records.

FOIA takes longer than a simple request, and you can cite the Privacy Act, but FOIA is different.

Edited by Berta
added more

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

Yes, as a formal claim, which they did acknowledge, they should have made a decision on it.......

but VA does not admit to making CUEs at the RO level....(unlike BVA - whereby a Motion alleging BVA CUE is found to be correct)

they will instead prepare a decision that awards the CUE,if it is valid.

Is it possible that the basis of your CUE was awarded as part of that decision?

That is how they awarded my SMC CUE and my  IHD CUE but it was a Nehmer AO decision-they mentioned the CUE claims, and awarded them with minimal rhetoric.

However the first decision I got contained a big time CUE,I raised a ruckus, and filed a complaint with IRIS, and they immediately reversed that decision.

I was hoping on that one they would admit to how incompetent they had been but they didnt. I am still poed by it.

I cant believe how many CUE s I have had to file.

The first AO decision stated that my husband's SMRs did not reveal IHD , so the IHD was not service connected.

WTF?   1stMARDIV ,USMC Danang 65-66----

(This was under the 2010 Nehmer AO Court decision)

I filed CUE Via IRIS complaint immediately and also with this VARO, reminding the dope who prepared the decision ( their initials were in the "RE": part, that probably NO Vietnam Vets in First Wave, Rolling Thunder, ever had any IHD mentioned in their SMRs because they were all basically KIDS!

They reversed immediately and proceeded with the adjudication.

Did the lack of any CUE decision impact on the decision you got?

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

MKAH, in theory, anytime a RO claims specialist does anything with a claim, especially if it's a SC issue, he/she is supposed(strong supposed) to make a written note, and include it in the C file.

 

What's the particulars in your case?

Allan

2-2-0 HUAH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The decision is supposed to give a "reasons and bases" for decision.  You should be able to find your answers there.  If not, this is an appealable issue.

At the BVA level, we often see lawyers appealing because there was an inadequate reasons and bases for decision.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 Most everything Military Related from when you swear in (Medical Reports In- Service Records , Unit locations ect,,ect,,

Once you start claims with the VA Everything that is reported goes into your C-File , not to say that things have a tendices to get lost or they never recieved them or was shredded.  just ask broncovet! 

 As Always a Veteran sending'' Anything'' to the VA....>  It's an Absolute must to get  SIGNED Return receipts from the post Office. keep in a safe place.

Make a Record and copy if you go through e benefits  DO NOT TRUST YOUR VSO For everything.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My husband, working with VSO in Chicago submitted a claim for 100% Disability for Ischemic Heart Disease, (due to heart attack and many other issues).  Vietnam/Navy 1967, went on land and his ship is on the list that the VA says was AO effected. 

I just looked at ebenefits and it "appears" as though he was approved for 10% disabled.  

He was seen by VA doctor for his service-connected disability he was claiming, in Chicago, but he was NOT A CARDIOLOGIST.

Where do I go from here?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Bubbleboy929 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use