Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Secondary condition question

Rate this question


saxman

Question

Hello everybody!  according to CFR 3.310 secondary condition become part of the original condition when service connection is establish for the secondary condition. My question is will my secondary condition be considered static since the original condition is static and 20 year protected?  All replies are welcome.  Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Great question.  I will give it an "intuitive" answer, it would require hours of legal reading to find out for sure.  Unless someone can cite case law that is precedential, then you can try intuitive answer.  

My intuitive answer:  No.  

While I get what you are saying there is another way to interpret this..that "how you arrived" at service connection (primary, secondary, presumptive, etc) makes no difference, only the date does.  

Interestingly, Im arguing along those same lines..provided, I can get an attorney to represent me at the CAVC for that.  

I allege the same thing you are..that the primary and secondary conditions are "inextricably intertwined" and you have to "bind them together with rope".   

While I am hopeful, it may mean there is no case precedence on this.  

Attorney's dont like "risking their own money" by taking on a case that does not have any precedence, reminding you that attorneys invest time (which is money) and expenses into a case, sometimes for years, and they want to get paid for their time, so I get that they dont like taking risks.  

Maybe there is case precedence..I just dont know.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Federal law under 38 CFR 3.310 governs these claims, and once granted, the secondary condition is considered a part of the original condition.

However as for as the 20 year rule  they would go by the Award date on the secondary/condition...  & this don't make any sense if they make it a part of the original condition.

   In my opinion it should be counted as the original condition  As the CFR 3.310  Clearly States. and go by that date  but VA is going to do what they do best and fight the Veteran on an issue like this.

I would not worry to much about it  if you have 20 years under your belt.  even if the secondary was added years later  its suppose to become part of the original condition.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If veteran  is granting service connection for secondary condition to an existing S.C. condition,  then full benefit is sought on appeal. 

So in my opinion they would go by the date of the awarded secondary condition.

 

jmo

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks Broncovet and Buck52!  I have a total of 5 secondary conditions related to my primary condition that is 20 year protected. The last one was just awarded May of this year and I have one that I did a NOD last year and waiting to see if it will be awarded because of the additional evidence I sent in with the NOD. The main thing I want is for the VA to say the secondary conditions are static! I would presume that they are because it's arthritis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I am not 100% sure on the 20 year rule for a secondary condition  if its  S.C. TO an Already S.C.  Condition,  that makes the Secondary a part of the first condition as a whole and static/chronic not expected to improve over your life time/just as (IF) you were rated chronic/static for the original condition.....  so it may very well be included in the 20 year rule   I mean how would they separate the service connected condition?  unless they  go by the date the secondary condition was awarded?

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Bubbleboy929 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use