Jump to content

Sponsored Ads



  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Advertisemnt

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
rhdawgs

PTSD C&P completed but have questions.....

Question

Hello, I recently had my C&P exam for PTSD. The Dr did diagnose me with PTSD and I certainly met ALL the requirements according to the DSM-5 Criteria. When I filed my claim with DAV, I had made a claim for the following mental disabilities:  PTSD, Panic disorder and /or/ agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder, & unspecified depressive disorder.

The QTC Dr made a strong case for PTSD and certainly diagnosed me with PTSD and checked the box "Occupational and Social Impairment with Reduced Reliability and Productivity"

He never did list any of the other disorders in my claim, although he states that due to my PHQ-9 score of 23 reflects I have severe depression and he also states that my PTSD checklist score(PCL-5) was 68. In the report he does check the box "The claimed condition was at least as likely as not(50% or greater probability) incurred in or caused by the claimed in-service injury, event, illness." He sighted my 2 stressors as evidence of the diagnosis for PTSD.

Also, no sign of a GAF score, did they discontinue using it? The only one that is in my report was from 2005 when I originally went to VA but had NO CLUE what I was doing except I knew I needed help, WAY BACK THEN.

When my VRO looked at the report he stated that it was good he didn't diagnose me with anything other than PTSD, why would that be? I hear of people stating they have a SC for PTSD with a secondary of Anxiety disorder. Just a little confused....

Sorry so long, I tried to list some things in the report without throwing the entire thing in here, but can do it if needed.

Thank you.

I can post the DBQ and the "short" report of his findings if needed, just figured it may be to much....
 

Edited by rhdawgs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

According to your post, you have at least 2 out of three of the Caluza elements, which are required for service connection:

They are 

1.  Current diagnosis of PTSD

2.  In service event or stressor.  The doctor can not supply this.  This "should" or needs to be, in your SMR's.  

3.  Nexus, or link between in service event and your current diagnosis of PTSD.  

It sounds like you may be missing number 2, you have 1 and 3 covered.  Do you have documention of an "in service event?" 

If this is in your file, you should be good to go with the Caluza elements and should eventually win benefits.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

Broncovet, Thank you very much for responding. 

So in my report yes, he states that both of my stressor's meet the criteria A for PTSD....Sorry, only have a hard copy of the Results at this point...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

So here's a couple of more questions and like I said, terribly sorry I don't have a soft copy of the DBQ, done by QTC and only have hard copy.

The Evaluater listed symptoms from the 70% down to 30% and under section 4 "Occupational and Social Impairment section", Dr checked diagnosis that would qualify for a rating of 50%  "Occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity". I personally think that a rating of 50% would be fair and would be extremely surprised if I received 70% (even though I have several in the 70%) but I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED if I received 30%, or 0% rating,  guess that's just me and my pessimism. I don't want to put the cart before the Horse because even though the examiner states that he believes my PTSD is a direct result of my Military stressors from my time in Iraq, it sounds like they could still disagree and not award me SC or say it is SC and give me 0%, so who the FREAK knows I guess.


But this is what he selected in my symptoms, I have some in the 70% and some as low as 30%  From the General Rating Formula for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder my symptoms are BOLDED.

From the  DSM-5 Criteria  Diagnostic Critieria sheet, I had several in everyone of the Options from A-E and 1 through F-G on each and in I: 2 Stressors that met  Criteria A.

 

In the Symptoms section, BOLD is what he checked...Just confused since they are all over the board. Also, is it really that subjective and unknown depending on the rater that this could go anywhere from 0%-70%?

Total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as: gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name. = 100%

Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood, due to such symptoms as: suicidal ideation; obsessional rituals which interfere with routine activities; speech intermittently illogical, obscure, or irrelevant; near-continuous panic or depression affecting the ability to function independently, appropriately and effectively; impaired impulse control (such as unprovoked irritability with periods of violence); spatial disorientation; neglect of personal appearance and hygiene; difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances (including work or a worklike setting); inability to establish and maintain effective relationships. = 70%

Occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as: flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short- and long-term memory (e.g., retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships.
=50%

Occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks (although generally functioning satisfactorily, with routine behavior, self-care, and conversation normal), due to such symptoms as: depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, panic attacks (weekly or less often), chronic sleep impairment, mild memory loss (such as forgetting names, directions, recent events). = 30%

I think the Dr simply selected the 50% option since I had several fall in both the 70% and 30% with 1 in the 50%, just from past experiences what do you guys think about a possible rating?

I appreciate any all thoughts and comments.

Edited by rhdawgs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
      • 2 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 8 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:

      https://www.stripes.com/news/lawmakers-launch-new-effort-to-provide-agent-orange-coverage-for-blue-water-navy-vets-1.525395

      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.

       

       
      • 9 replies
    • Cue Claim Template?
      I was told by my VSO to write a statement for a CUE claim. I am looking at the CUE because the VA didn't follow VA Training Letter 10-02 that should have directly S/C'ed me for my tinnitus without an exam, but also because they approved my Re-open claim 2 years later and the only difference was a new C&P exam.

      Any help would be great. This is what I came up with:

      I respectfully request the VA to call a clear and unmistakable error on part of the January 3, 2013 decision from the Boise VARO and to correct it.

      In this Decision Letter, I was denied service-connection for Tinnitus. I mentioned tinnitus (ringing in the ears) on my April 4, 2012 Statement in Support of Claim for hearing loss. Tinnitus is listed as a deferred claim on my September 4, 2012 Decision Letter. I submitted a Statement in Support of Claim for Tinnitus on September 5, 2012 and again on October 25, 2012.

      I was given a C&P exam on August 14, 2012 by Audiology and Hearing Aid Center in Boise, Idaho.

      I received my Decision letter with the denial of Tinnitus on January 3, 2013 stating that “Your service treatment records do not contain complaints, treatment or diagnosis for this condition”.

      During my C&P exam, it was stated that I didn’t have any mention of tinnitus in my Service Treatment Records (STR).

      On the Compensation and Pension Exam Inquiry dated July 13, 2012 on page 3, the hearing exam that was completed on 4/1/2008 is also where my tinnitus was identified while in service, but there was no mention of my tinnitus in the inquiry.

      The evidence listed on my Decision Letter dated January 13, 2013 listed Service Treatment Records from June 5, 1989 to March 3, 2010.

      In VA Training Letter 10-02 dated March 18, 2010, on page 7, item #5 it states: If service treatment records mention a complaint of tinnitus and the veteran claims tinnitus and has current complaints of tinnitus, a medical opinion regarding possible causation is not required. Service connection can be established without an opinion about the specific cause of the tinnitus because it began in service.

      The VA's failure to consider and evaluate the evidence and follow VA Training Letters that the VA had in their possession manifestly altered the outcome of the decision referred to above.

      If the Tinnitus claim was approved on the Decision Letter dated January 13, 2013, it would have increased my rating from 60% to 70% at the time.
      • 30 replies
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines