Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appealing the Effective date

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Moderator

I'm appealing the effective date for benefits.  Since this is a BVA decision Im appealing, my goal is to get attorney representation.  I will be speaking with an attorney this week.  

Im alleging the VA violated 3.156 (b) "pending claim", by not repopening my claim in 2004.  Instead of reopening due to new and material evidence, they started a new claim which I did not appeal.  

Importantly, the Issue of TDIU is "not stand alone", that is, there is no "stand alone TDIU claim", but rather a request for increase on all issues including TDIU.  

The Board denied an earlier effective date, reasoning it was because "that is the date I was awarded SC for depression".  

I allege that the date I was awarded depression is irrelevant, because a claim for TDIU is a claim for increase, so that the Board should have considered whether or not there was an increase in depression as well as TDIU, because the TDIU claim does not "stand alone" its an increase in the relevant issues also.  

    I allege the submission of new and material evidence, under 38 cfr 3.156 b renders my 2005 claim "non final" and pending.

Your opinions???

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

@broncovet- Late reply - just browsing 

I attempted this with a phone consult w/Matt Hill of Hill & Ponton back in December 2016 

He was not very encouraging in my case. 

I appreciate his directness- I still have thoughts because I have clear cut scenario - just no energy to act on it - my Effective date should be 70% 1997-2010. 

Just thought I would chime in ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Thank you, "L".   

  Hill and Pontoon is a good firm, but, like all firms they make "business decisions" based on their own needs and wants, and experience.  Just because a lawyer turns you down does not mean your case is not valid.  

   Many, many years ago, I had a broken heart as a "girl" turned me down.  Later, I realized that women are like banannas in that a bannana is only "ripe" for a few days or a week or two at best.  Before they are too green, and after that, they turn black and rotten.  

   I realized the girl I was interested in was "too green"...she simply was not ready.  It did not mean I was bad..it just mean I had to choose whether to wait on her, or find another one that was ripe.  I chose the later.  

I realize now I chose correctly.  No, gals dont like us calling them bannanas, but that is better than some names that could be thought up.  

     Hill and Pontoon was not "ripe" for you then.  Like other businesses, law firms go "feast or famine", where sometimes they are very lean, while at others there is a long line.  

     My suggestion is you try another firm, if its not too late.  

     I just spoke with a lawyer today, who offered to represent me.  And 4 others had turned me down.   I still have 2 more to speak with and I will make a decision.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@broncovet Excellent advice,  I understand the metaphor. LOL

I had been turned down by one other, my evidence is clear cut - overwhelming. - maybe I just needed a breather. 

Encouraging words- thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Bubbleboy929 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use