Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Certified Audiologist vs VA audiologist

Rate this question


Heller

Question

I submitted a fully-developed claim which included audiology results from a certified Au.D.:

Average of 1k, 2k, 3k, 4k = 58 in best ear. Speech recognition 55% & 65%

The VA made me take a test with their (outsourced) audiologist, unknown credentials:

Average of 1k, 2k, 3k, 4k = 56 in best ear. Speech recognition 94% & 94%!

How could there be such a discrepancy? Is this enough to appeal, or should I get another audiologist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The VA C & P Hearing Test requires a Recorded Word Recognition Test. Was your C & P Word Recognition test based on a Recording or did the examiner speak the test words to you?

As to your Frequency Range, it's a computer-generated test, the results are the results, based on your responses.

Did you also file a claim for Tinnitus? Completely separate Rating of SC 10% (one or both ears) if Awarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

To refute VA's audiologist, you may consider a 3rd audiologist.  As Gastone indicated, the tests must be done to "VA specificiations", that is, the "Maryland CNC test".   Or, you can move forward and try to get VA to give you the benefit of the doubt with the higher evaluation.  

The difference between 56 and 58 is unlikely that much.  However, the difference in speech discrimination is HUGE.  

While I have not seen this large of a discrepency..my hearing tests are consistent over the past 19 years, with about 5 different audiologists, some va and some not va, this needs resolved. 

The good news is that you can often get an audio report at little or no cost..from audiologists who run hearing tests to sell hearing aids.  That is where they get there money..selling hearing aids.  

I do not recommend you hornswaggle the private audiologist..but, after you get your retro...pay him a fair price and expalin VA pays for your hearing aids.  The audiologist deserves 100 to 200 dollars for a hearing test with report.  You have to make sure they use the VA method, or its no good.  You can look on your current audio report..or call him..and ask him if he used the maryland cnc test. 

 Medical evidence is medical evidence.  It should not matter the source..VA or private, especially since VA trains private audiologists, and VA audiologists are sometimes trained by private audiologists.  They need only be "competent" to offer an expert audologist opinion.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

To refute VA's audiologist, you may consider a 3rd audiologist.  As Gastone indicated, the tests must be done to "VA specificiations", that is, the "Maryland CNC test".   Or, you can move forward and try to get VA to give you the benefit of the doubt with the higher evaluation.  

The difference between 56 and 58 is unlikely that much.  However, the difference in speech discrimination is HUGE.  

While I have not seen this large of a discrepency..my hearing tests are consistent over the past 19 years, with about 5 different audiologists, some va and some not va, this needs resolved. 

The good news is that you can often get an audio report at little or no cost..from audiologists who run hearing tests to sell hearing aids.  That is where they get there money..selling hearing aids.  

I do not recommend you hornswaggle the private audiologist..but, after you get your retro...pay him a fair price and expalin VA pays for your hearing aids.  The audiologist deserves 100 to 200 dollars for a hearing test with report.  You have to make sure they use the VA method, or its no good.  You can look on your current audio report..or call him..and ask him if he used the maryland cnc test.  

Medical evidence is medical evidence.  It should not matter the source..VA or private, especially since VA trains private audiologists, and VA audiologists are sometimes trained by private audiologists.  They need only be "competent" to offer an expert audologist opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

In the SRT using the Maryland CNC, I did not respond at all if I did not understand the test word, only responded if I could actually hear the word. I know I didn't respond to many of the words, but my speech recognition was graded at 94%. I now suspect that the blank responses were not counted as a failure to hear, but were simply ignored, and only my actual responses were used for the 94% grade. Should I have said, "can't hear that" or something for each of the unknown words?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Have you received a Denial Letter yet? If not, you might be jumping the gun.

I think your VA Computer determined Frequency Decibel Hearing Loss probably didn't support a "I didn't hear that." You may or may not remember the VA C & P Clinician instructing you to say the recorded word you hear, even if it's a guess. Those words you responded too, were obviously correct.

How about posting a redacted copy of your C & P and Denial?

Did you also Claim an SC for Tinnitus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Over the years I've had a number of the "Free" Costco, Sam's Club and other Hearing aid Co's Hearing tests, none ever used the Maryland CNC criteria or for that matter any type of Recorded Word Recognition test. Never more that 30 or 40 spoken words but always advised to guess if unsure.

My 1st actual Hearing Loss and Tinnitus DX was by a private ENT back in 09. The actual Hearing test was conducted by a non-medical State Certified Hearing Testing Clinician. Spoken word testing was within a couple points of the VA Recorded Word and the Freq loss was almost identical.

Have you applied for Hearing aids at the VA, they'll test you again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use