Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Coronary Artery Disease Secondary to Hyperlipidemia

Rate this question


Emmanuel Lawler

Question

I had suffered a myocardial infraction and underwent triple bypass surgery in June of 2017. I had sought medical assistance for chronic chest pains on three separate occasions while on active duty and have documentation of having hyperlipidemia upon my retirement physical in 1999. Would this qualify as service connected?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Yes, but my opinion does not count, and neither does yours, or Donald Trump's.  

You need these 2 things:

1.  Current diagnosis.  MI, CAD, etc. etc. 

2.  Nexus.  You need a doctor to document, "The Veterans CAD, MI, etc., is at least as likely as not due to his SC hyperlipidemia."  

     That is, you dont need an "in service event or aggravation" if its secondary, because your primary already has that covered.  

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On ‎10‎/‎26‎/‎2017 at 12:27 PM, Emmanuel Lawler said:

I had suffered a myocardial infraction and underwent triple bypass surgery in June of 2017. I had sought medical assistance for chronic chest pains on three separate occasions while on active duty and have documentation of having hyperlipidemia upon my retirement physical in 1999. Would this qualify as service connected?

Would I need a nexus letter from my physician or would my in-service diagnosis be sufficient?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What was the DX regarding the Chest Pain, any mention of CAD or Angina?  What were your LDL long term Lab numbers as well as HDL numbers.

You're going to need a Cardiologist opinion as to the etiology of your CAD. Controlled LDL numbers don't guarantee the development of CAD. Has more to do with eating and Life style since you left the womb. A lifetime of high Fat foods, smoking and drinking are among the usual suspects, as well as exposure to the VA AO Presumptive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I am in the same exact situation.  I had a NSTEMI MI in June 2017.  I have records from military and VA doctors with test results for hyperlipidemia.  Had 2 stents put in in June and another in Oct.  Have yet to have METs test(s), dont think I can since I cant even take a hot shower or walk up a flight of stairs without chest pains and shortness of breath.  I also have back and sciatica in both legs, plus knee injury which prevents me from working out or exercising for past 17 years.  I have filed for CAD and  MI but I will not see my Cardio doctor again until June, and I plan on pursuing nexus letter for hyperlipidemia and sedentary lifestyle due to a service-connected injury.  I would like to note, I was never told, briefed or informed of hyperlipidemia by the military nor the VA, nor was I ever treated.  Shame I could have avoided CAD and MI if I was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

CAD Secondary to PTSD and/or Depression is a tough sell, while not impossible, it's not an automatic.

Have you had a discussion with your Cardiologist regarding possible etiology of your CAD? Clinician Treatment Notes could go a long way if they provide supportive Evidence of a correlation with the MH Issues.

How's your BMI %? Any history of the "Usual CAD Suspects?" You need an "at least as likely as not" Board Certified Cardiologist support statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

CAD is on the "presumptive" list for VEterans of certain wars.  See the regulation here to see if it applies to you:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.309

"Presumptive" means that if you served at the proper time, in the applicable country(s), and if you have been diagnosed with the disease, you are "presumed" to have gotten it in service, that is, its service connected.  

If your disease in on the presumptive list, (and Shinseki added CAD to the presumptive list) then it makes it much easier for you to get service connection.  You may not even need the nexus because its presumed you got it from service.  

This said, its often that VA denies without a nexus, even tho its a presumptive.  The board should "fix" that, as long as you point it out in your appeal.  You may even get it with the DRO review, too.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • navyvet2009 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use