Jump to content
VA Disability Claims Community Forums - HadIt.com Veterans
  • veterans-crisis-line.jpg
    The Veterans Crisis Line can help even if you’re not enrolled in VA benefits or health care.

    CHAT NOW

  • question-001.jpeg

    Have Questions? Get Answers.

    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery instead of ‘I have a question.
       
    2. Knowledgeable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title.
      I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
       
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one massive, rambling introduction or story.
       
      Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph, there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.
     
    Leading too:

    exclamation-point.pngPost straightforward questions and then post background information.
     
     
    Examples:
     
    • Question A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • Adding Background information in your post will help members understand what information you are looking for so they can assist you in finding it.
    Rephrase the question: I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine, but the claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
     
    • Question B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • See how the details below give us a better understanding of what you’re claiming.
    Rephrase the question: I was involved in a traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?
     
    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial of your claim?”
     
    Note:
     
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. This process does not take long.
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. The review requirement will usually be removed by the 6th post. However, we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.
    • This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before hitting the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims, and this helps us do that.
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • VA Watchdog

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

"attorneys For Veterans" Law May Be Overturned


jessejames

Recommended Posts

http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/nf07/nfJAN07/nf010407-10.htm

"ATTORNEYS FOR VETERANS" LAW MAY BE OVERTURNED

BY NEW CONGRESS -- Legal advocacy group claims

backroom deal will allow legislation to "be introduced

in the next session to repeal that portion of S-3421

that would permit attorney representation."

The information comes from a Bulletin-by-Fax newsletter from the Workers Injury Law & advocacy Group (WILG). Their web site is here...

http://www.wilg.org/index.asp

It seems there was a backroom deal in the 109th Congress to pass the "Attorneys for Veterans" legislation, then have that law repealed by passing a new law in the 110th Congress.

It should be noted that the two biggest foes of this legislation are the DAV and VFW. If this legislation is overturned and veterans are not allowed to use attorneys in the VA claims process, we have those two organizations to thank.

Background on the legislation here...

http://www.vawatchdog.org/nfDEC06/nf121006-1.htm

Information from WILG is below:

---------------

Dear WILG Member,

Note: There is a very unusual background situation that has been going on on Capitol Hill regarding the Veterans' "bill" S-3421, signed into law by the President less than a week ago. (WILG will be providing you with more information on these unusual developments, as we review the unfolding events and deals.)

It is our understanding that there may have been some sort of quiet "back corridors" agreement reached between the two major Parties in order that the overall bill concerned (S-3421) would be allowed to pass earlier this month ... subject to a rare, but agreed-upon back-room "deal" for future introduction of a new bill to then repeal the Veterans' representation portion of the new law...all of this done so as not to hold up other provisions of the bill, in the last-minute scramble for passage of various pre-Holidays bills.

This type of relatively rare, "we-agree-to-enact, but-then-introduce-another-bill-to-repeal-a-portion of-the-new law" is not the way business is normally done in Congress. Nor is it "open and honest government."

We will have our work cut out for us, to help many justice groups --and the American public--see an impending travesty of justice for our country's returning Veterans. Many of them simply cannot capably represent themselves, as they suffer injuries, disabilities, or lack of understanding...which the Federal government can too often take advantage of, via dismissal of their claims and regardless of their merit.

(See the below for additional information from the Chair of WILG's Veterans' Law Committee of WILG.)

Randall Scott, for WILG -in Washington, DC

"I have learned that the attorney fee provision contained in S-3421 could be repealed during the next Congressional session. It is my understanding that S-3421 went through the Senate on unanimous consent. Before it passed, one Senator had placed a hold on the bill, which means that the bill would not have been passed without that Senator lifting his hold on the bill.

Apparently, this Senator objected to the attorney fee provision contained in the bill. My under-standing is that the Senator lifted the hold with the understanding that a new bill would be introduced in the next [Congressional] Session to repeal the portion of S-3421 that would permit attorney representation at the NOD stage.

Since the attorney fee portion of the bill will not be effective for 180 days after the date of enactment, I expect a bill will be introduced immediately in the new Session to repeal it.

Therefore, I think we need to be prepared to defend the right of veterans to hire counsel to represent them in their claims before the VA, in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

WILG Members should be prepared to have their clients write to their respective Representatives in support of S-3421, if and when a bill is introduced to repeal the attorney-fee provisions."

WILG's thanks go to Robert V. Chisholm, Esq. (RI) for his superb work & tracking of a new "law."

---------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have already contacted my Representative and both my Senators about this crap! This sends a very clear message to the veteran; "we will support you all the way while you're a "troop" but once you become a veteran, you can go to he::"

We need to get on top of this and contact our politicians and let them know we will not let this go down without a fight. Now is a good time as any as a lot of them are listening to their constituants as they showed so poorly in the poles lately.

This really frosts my butt. We have been treated like second-class citizens for how long now, the Civil War??? Contacting our congressional critters is easy, just Google their names, go to their web sites and there usually is a "contact" tab where you can e-mail them. You don't need to have a college degree in literature, just tell them if they shoot this down, you won't vote for them in the next election.

A REALLY MAD jaz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hello,

i'm new to the forum. i'm a disabled vet and have a non-service connected rating. if you will allow me, i would like to tell my story, but i promise an easter egg at the end.

i've been in a battle for over 10 years in appeal with the va for service connected disability. i didn't have an attorney, but i was represented by the dav, which by the way is opposed to the attorneys collecting fees for helping you fill out your paperwork.

that said, the dav represented me all the way to the veteran board of appeals, where once again i was denied service connected disability. the dav told me that they had gone as far as they could go with me and that i had to face the u.s. court of appeals for veteran claims by myself or find an attorney.

needless to say, i was forlorn. i began to research my psychiatric disability and prepare a case. i was in a va rep's office one day trying to get the va to help my mother afford assisted living care. i happened to mention my predicament. we discussed it for a while and after he found out that i had gone as far as the vba he told me of an attorney who might represent me. he made a copy of his card and gave it to me.

i was represented at the u.s. court and the court has since remanded the case back to the vba. when i received my copy of the brief to the u.s. court of appeals for veterans claims i knew i had the case won. i, rather my attorney, have been waiting for the vba to issue a hearing date.

the attorney's name is mark r. lippman. he has a 98% success rate in representing veterans. i must warn you that he doesn't take on all cases. i had to send him my vba rejection for review. after he reviewed it he sent me a letter and a stack of forms to fill out and told me that my case had merit. that was music to my ears. he told me that his fee was 20% of what he recovered from the va. now that's better than the 50% other attorneys with less experience and success charge.

here's the easter egg i promised.

mark r. lippman

8070 la jolla shores drive #437

la jolla, ca 92037

858-456-5840

888-811-0523

fax - 858-456-5855

http://www.veteranslaw.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly hope you win your case.

The CAVC does sometimes overturn BVA decisions.It all depends on the evidence.

Hiring attorneys means the buyer should be aware.

There are many attorneys who were never in VA case law situations before but are representing vets due to the new Attorney regs ( filing NOD after June 20, 2007)

Others ( his name is familiar and his cases are at the CAVC- I just read a fairly recent remand he got for a widow and an award for a PTSD vet) have a track record at the BVA and the CAVC.

Good luck with your case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

There ain't no easter eggs. There ain't no easter bunny or Santa Clause. Every thing has its price even the eggs. Good luck with the DAV.

Berta,

Bills claim, my father inlaw WW2 and korean vet with 30% army retirement, was denied with his representation of the PVA POA. We have a few days to file a NOD. Do you know if the repeal of Our Vets Lawyers law will resend claims that are already in process after JUNE 20, 2007?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

I was pretty impressed with Karl K. If he wins my CUE he is going to have a lot of business. I mean he flew all the way from New Jersey to Florida for my claim. He must think it has a chance because I did not buy his ticket, or pay for his room, or rental car. The DRO was actually agreeing that I was low balled on my original claim. Is this for real?

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta

I was pretty impressed with Karl K. If he wins my CUE he is going to have a lot of business. I mean he flew all the way from New Jersey to Florida for my claim. He must think it has a chance because I did not buy his ticket, or pay for his room, or rental car. The DRO was actually agreeing that I was low balled on my original claim. Is this for real?

John

Sounds like you caught a big break you were looking for John999 and Lawyers don't travel unless they smell money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Maybe, Yoggie, and it only took 37 years. It only took Betty 44 years to get a rating. At this speed I will get all my back pay by age 134. I need to get in shape if I am going to live that long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, Yoggie, and it only took 37 years. It only took Betty 44 years to get a rating. At this speed I will get all my back pay by age 134. I need to get in shape if I am going to live that long.

I guess that falls in to that category " If I'd thought I'd lived this long I'd took better care of my self."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yoggie:

That is really a good one.

John:

I am trying to survive for a long time just to get back at VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Pete

Your CUE on your HB may be one way of getting back on them. You might want a lawyer to argue this case for you because when pleading one of these things it is like walking through a minefield. Just the way you phrase your CUE can ruin your chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is Karl K, I need a good attorney, I live in Jersey????

Berta

I was pretty impressed with Karl K. If he wins my CUE he is going to have a lot of business. I mean he flew all the way from New Jersey to Florida for my claim. He must think it has a chance because I did not buy his ticket, or pay for his room, or rental car. The DRO was actually agreeing that I was low balled on my original claim. Is this for real?

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you live in Jersey, then Karl K may be a good choice for you. I am not sure that an attorney who travels from NJ to Florida cares about the client in Fla as much as he/she cares about the climate or investments in Fla. I personally had a bad experience with Karl K, and have since had a hard time trying to rid myself of him and his law firm. They are like a bad infection that wont go away unless you take alll of the antibiotics the Doc prescribed.

Initial conversations were AWESOME, and they filed standard paperwork QUICKLY. The problem I have is that no one from that firm even knows for what condition I am filing for disibility. They also hold all of the keys for speeding up the process, and when I told them that my mortgage company was forclosing on my home, I got some sympathy, but absolutely no action.

I asked them to file for an OTR Review, and Karl promised to "personally look into it". A month later, without a single word or question from anyone at the firm, and I decided enough was enough (see thread by the same name)".

No matter what, I still feel that hiring an attorney is the only way to go, but just don't pick the first silver tongued devil that promises you a fair deal.

Sincerely,

Your Ruski Linguist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines