Jump to content
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Ad Free Subscription.jpgOne Time Financial Gift.jpg

    Subscriptions and Gifts are NOT Tax Deductible. HadIt.com is NOT a Non Profit.


"attorneys For Veterans" Law May Be Overturned

Recommended Posts



BY NEW CONGRESS -- Legal advocacy group claims

backroom deal will allow legislation to "be introduced

in the next session to repeal that portion of S-3421

that would permit attorney representation."

The information comes from a Bulletin-by-Fax newsletter from the Workers Injury Law & advocacy Group (WILG). Their web site is here...


It seems there was a backroom deal in the 109th Congress to pass the "Attorneys for Veterans" legislation, then have that law repealed by passing a new law in the 110th Congress.

It should be noted that the two biggest foes of this legislation are the DAV and VFW. If this legislation is overturned and veterans are not allowed to use attorneys in the VA claims process, we have those two organizations to thank.

Background on the legislation here...


Information from WILG is below:


Dear WILG Member,

Note: There is a very unusual background situation that has been going on on Capitol Hill regarding the Veterans' "bill" S-3421, signed into law by the President less than a week ago. (WILG will be providing you with more information on these unusual developments, as we review the unfolding events and deals.)

It is our understanding that there may have been some sort of quiet "back corridors" agreement reached between the two major Parties in order that the overall bill concerned (S-3421) would be allowed to pass earlier this month ... subject to a rare, but agreed-upon back-room "deal" for future introduction of a new bill to then repeal the Veterans' representation portion of the new law...all of this done so as not to hold up other provisions of the bill, in the last-minute scramble for passage of various pre-Holidays bills.

This type of relatively rare, "we-agree-to-enact, but-then-introduce-another-bill-to-repeal-a-portion of-the-new law" is not the way business is normally done in Congress. Nor is it "open and honest government."

We will have our work cut out for us, to help many justice groups --and the American public--see an impending travesty of justice for our country's returning Veterans. Many of them simply cannot capably represent themselves, as they suffer injuries, disabilities, or lack of understanding...which the Federal government can too often take advantage of, via dismissal of their claims and regardless of their merit.

(See the below for additional information from the Chair of WILG's Veterans' Law Committee of WILG.)

Randall Scott, for WILG -in Washington, DC

"I have learned that the attorney fee provision contained in S-3421 could be repealed during the next Congressional session. It is my understanding that S-3421 went through the Senate on unanimous consent. Before it passed, one Senator had placed a hold on the bill, which means that the bill would not have been passed without that Senator lifting his hold on the bill.

Apparently, this Senator objected to the attorney fee provision contained in the bill. My under-standing is that the Senator lifted the hold with the understanding that a new bill would be introduced in the next [Congressional] Session to repeal the portion of S-3421 that would permit attorney representation at the NOD stage.

Since the attorney fee portion of the bill will not be effective for 180 days after the date of enactment, I expect a bill will be introduced immediately in the new Session to repeal it.

Therefore, I think we need to be prepared to defend the right of veterans to hire counsel to represent them in their claims before the VA, in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

WILG Members should be prepared to have their clients write to their respective Representatives in support of S-3421, if and when a bill is introduced to repeal the attorney-fee provisions."

WILG's thanks go to Robert V. Chisholm, Esq. (RI) for his superb work & tracking of a new "law."


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


I have already contacted my Representative and both my Senators about this crap! This sends a very clear message to the veteran; "we will support you all the way while you're a "troop" but once you become a veteran, you can go to he::"

We need to get on top of this and contact our politicians and let them know we will not let this go down without a fight. Now is a good time as any as a lot of them are listening to their constituants as they showed so poorly in the poles lately.

This really frosts my butt. We have been treated like second-class citizens for how long now, the Civil War??? Contacting our congressional critters is easy, just Google their names, go to their web sites and there usually is a "contact" tab where you can e-mail them. You don't need to have a college degree in literature, just tell them if they shoot this down, you won't vote for them in the next election.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


i'm new to the forum. i'm a disabled vet and have a non-service connected rating. if you will allow me, i would like to tell my story, but i promise an easter egg at the end.

i've been in a battle for over 10 years in appeal with the va for service connected disability. i didn't have an attorney, but i was represented by the dav, which by the way is opposed to the attorneys collecting fees for helping you fill out your paperwork.

that said, the dav represented me all the way to the veteran board of appeals, where once again i was denied service connected disability. the dav told me that they had gone as far as they could go with me and that i had to face the u.s. court of appeals for veteran claims by myself or find an attorney.

needless to say, i was forlorn. i began to research my psychiatric disability and prepare a case. i was in a va rep's office one day trying to get the va to help my mother afford assisted living care. i happened to mention my predicament. we discussed it for a while and after he found out that i had gone as far as the vba he told me of an attorney who might represent me. he made a copy of his card and gave it to me.

i was represented at the u.s. court and the court has since remanded the case back to the vba. when i received my copy of the brief to the u.s. court of appeals for veterans claims i knew i had the case won. i, rather my attorney, have been waiting for the vba to issue a hearing date.

the attorney's name is mark r. lippman. he has a 98% success rate in representing veterans. i must warn you that he doesn't take on all cases. i had to send him my vba rejection for review. after he reviewed it he sent me a letter and a stack of forms to fill out and told me that my case had merit. that was music to my ears. he told me that his fee was 20% of what he recovered from the va. now that's better than the 50% other attorneys with less experience and success charge.

here's the easter egg i promised.

mark r. lippman

8070 la jolla shores drive #437

la jolla, ca 92037



fax - 858-456-5855


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly hope you win your case.

The CAVC does sometimes overturn BVA decisions.It all depends on the evidence.

Hiring attorneys means the buyer should be aware.

There are many attorneys who were never in VA case law situations before but are representing vets due to the new Attorney regs ( filing NOD after June 20, 2007)

Others ( his name is familiar and his cases are at the CAVC- I just read a fairly recent remand he got for a widow and an award for a PTSD vet) have a track record at the BVA and the CAVC.

Good luck with your case.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

There ain't no easter eggs. There ain't no easter bunny or Santa Clause. Every thing has its price even the eggs. Good luck with the DAV.


Bills claim, my father inlaw WW2 and korean vet with 30% army retirement, was denied with his representation of the PVA POA. We have a few days to file a NOD. Do you know if the repeal of Our Vets Lawyers law will resend claims that are already in process after JUNE 20, 2007?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Type 1 Diabetes recent onset!
      I was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes in September 2017 OUT OF NOWHERE.

      i am a Navy Reservist and deployed in later 2009 to mid 2010 and again later 2014 to mid 2015; had a 2 year recall between those deployments.  

      Only healthcare received since commissioning in 2008 was from the Navy and no issues EVER.

      insulin dependent and have dietary restrictions and in a non deployable status.

      VA denied initial claim due to Type 1 not showing on active duty and now appealing.

      Anyone with successful experience getting a rating with my circumstances?  I live in Upstate New York.
      • 9 replies
    • Agent Orange Kadena Afb Okinawa
      I am looking for anyone who was on Kadena AFB, Okinawa or .Chanute AFB, IL. My dad was there from Oct. 68-April 70. He has ichemic heart disease, diabetes which has resulted in the amputation of his right leg below the knee and peripheral neuropathy. We were denied in 2002 AMVETS filed a claim on his behalf for heart condition, diabetes and back problems. I refiled in December 2011 and have just received the claim statements and medical release forms. I am familiar with filling out this paper work because my husband is a combat veteran of Iraqi Freedom. I have been reading articles from the Japan times and I am a member of the Agent Orange Okinawa facebook page. Another thing that helps make my dad's case is that he was on Chanute AFB, IL and it is on the EPA Superfund list and has PCBs/Pesticides and Dioxins/Furans listed as ground and water contaminants. I welcome any advice, tips or articles that I may have missed in my own research.
      • 15 replies
    • CBO Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2019 to 2028 Published Dec 2018
      CBO Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2019 to 2028 - This CBO Report has been making the news. This post includes parts relevant to veterans. Nothing has been decided as of yet and some seem very unlikely but you never know. Forewarned is Forearmed.


      • 8 replies
    • 2019 Veterans Benefits
      State Benefits, Space A and More ... https://www.hadit.com/2019-changes-to-veterans-benefits-state-and-federal/
      • 2 replies
    • Appeal granted and closed.
      My appeal was granted and closed on November 9.  I got an unofficial notification from the DAV on November 15 stating "appeal granted with an evaluation of 30%" which is great!  My question is this:  How long until I get the official notification from the va? Nothing on ebennies has updated since the appeal closed. Appeal is now in historical and just says complete and at originating va office. I understand no one knows va timelines to a tee but a general timeline would be great.  Thank you all! Hope you have a Merry Christmas!


      Edit:  This was my first time appealing and it was a VBA grant. 
        • Like
      • 6 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines