Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

1st Time VA Claim -

Rate this question


MarkP

Question

This is my first time in this forum and new to the VA compensation arena. I hope I'm in the right place.

I want to file a claim regarding being exposed to the chemical MALATHION while in the service. I entered the service in 1981 and was discharged in 1992. I was outside the time frame for the Presumptive diseases associated with Agent Orange. MALATHION is an insecticide that was used during the Vietnam Era and is named in the Agent Orange laws that have come out in the last ten years. I was a military working dog handler and it was SOP to "dip" or bath our assigned military working dogs in this insecticide to manage ticks, etc. The disability, or disease that I think is a direct result of using this chemical is Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia )(CLL). This type of Leukemia and all other B-Cell Cell Leukemias are mentioned in the Agent Orange laws as a result of the different chemicals used in Agent Orange and other insectides during the Vietnam Era. As you can see, my issue is that I did not serve during this time and I'm outside the "window" of this law. My intention is to file a claim that this service related chemical (MALATHION) has resulted in myself coming down with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. My family has no history of this disease and once diagnosed, my oncologist asked me if I had came into contact with any "chemicals"........ Would I file a "Presumptive" claim using the Agent Orange law? I'm outside the time frame as I have stated, so I don't know if because of that fact the VA would just throw out my claim or should I use another approach? I don't want to waste time and file a solid claim. Any help would be much appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 1

You are correct that B cell CLL is an AO presumptive.

But that is only if you can prove exposure to AO.

 "I was a military working dog handler"

The very first AO Thailand veteran was a military dog handler and his MOS put him on the perimeter of the Base in Thailand.

Other vets have proven their exposure to AO outside of Vietnam.

But I dont think that info will help you because of when you served.

AO was not used after 1971, per the Ranch Hand Study......

However there is some info on the net that associates CLL with exposure to malathion.

 https://healthunlocked.com/cllsupport/posts/649348/causal-link-with-pesticide-exposure-and-cll

I feel you will need to file for direct service connection due to your inservice exposure to malathion.

And I believe you will defnitely need to get and Independent Medicl Evauation/opinion from an exopert in the filed of Insecticides and/or CLL.

If you can definiitely prove your inservice exposure to malathion, and a IMO/IME doctor can give a complete medical rationale, with some article/treatises that support his/her opinion, that your CLL has no other etiology (or cause) but for your exposure to malathion,inservice,  the VA could award this claim.

It was definitely used during the Gulf War:

https://www.nap.edu/read/10628/chapter/7#100

But I have been unable to find a CLL award at the BVA due to this pesticide/insecticide.

Your oncologist might be able to prepare a strong IMO/IME for you- and I suggest reading the topic Read First befor getting an IMO here at hadit, to see what he will eed to have and also what he will need to state in the opinion.

You could give him a print off of the info in the first link I posted above, and maybe I can find something more on the net-

were you exposed to any other chemicals in service?

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

Here is the Read first IMO/IME Link:

https://community.hadit.com/forums/topic/53826-read-first-if-getting-an-imo/

 

The " as likely as not"wording is critical and he needs to rule out any other etiology but for the Pesticide/insecticide.

Farmers use this stuff too---I hope you dont have a farm work history.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I was stationed at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland which has been identified as a Super Fund Site. To my knowledge I wasn't exposed at that location except the Malathion.  In the Philippines I guarded the bomb dump and who knows what was in the bunkers. In Kunsan Air Base, South Korea there were nukes and those were guarded, but no exposure to raw material that I know of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This site has some info on malathion but the study is not recent- so they might have more updated info by now-

They have a contact area:

http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/malatech.html

I wonder if maybe your doctor had a specific chemical in mind, when he mentioned chemical exposure.

I did a search for CLL and benzene exposure and found this award right away:

"ORDER:

Service connection for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (claimed as bone cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma), as due to exposed to various chemicals during service, including benzene, is granted."

https://www.va.gov/vetapp17/files4/1722511.txt

Nothing is impossible but claims like this often need a lot of research and leg work....and a strong IMO/IME

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My oncologist is preparing the IMO/IME letter for my claim. I tried to explain the "exact wording" that the VA just needs to read ("..as likely as not") and all and they have assured me that they have done these letters in the past.I hope she gets it right and is a powerful letter. I also asked her to address the chronic fatigue syndrome that I have as well. I contribute this to the CLL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use