Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bad Paper Discharge

Rate this question


Flyfishingnut

Question

I'm presently working with a Vietman Veteran, who has a "under conditions other than honorable".  He has been receiving medical care from a VA Healthcare Facility.  When we tried to apply for Disability Benefits, he was denied.  During our search, we discovered that he has receive a "Pardon", from President Ford.  However, the VA, is refusing to honor this Pardon, and is refusing any Disability Rating.  We have appealed and they want him to come to WA., for a furture appeal.  We applied and asked for a teleconference appeal, and was granted.  We are waiting for a date/time.

Just wondering if anyone has any exprience with this sort of appeal, and any suggestions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
1 hour ago, Flyfishingnut said:

I'm presently working with a Vietman Veteran, who has a "under conditions other than honorable".  He has been receiving medical care from a VA Healthcare Facility.  When we tried to apply for Disability Benefits, he was denied.  During our search, we discovered that he has receive a "Pardon", from President Ford.  However, the VA, is refusing to honor this Pardon, and is refusing any Disability Rating.  We have appealed and they want him to come to WA., for a furture appeal.  We applied and asked for a teleconference appeal, and was granted.  We are waiting for a date/time.

Just wondering if anyone has any exprience with this sort of appeal, and any suggestions.

I may be in the minority, but need to know what the BCD was for. This helps me reach a better informed decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The paper was for AWOL.  Exact number unsure.  The Veteran, did have time served in Nam, but his AWOL, was stateside.  Cumlitive was just north of 180 days.  His awards include NDSM, and Viet Service with 2 Bronse Stars.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If you google 'Bad paper veterans" a lot will pop up such as:

https://www.militarytimes.com/veterans/2018/01/26/dod-va-team-up-on-new-tool-to-help-with-bad-paper-upgrade-applications/

If you google Bad paper veterans hadit.com more will pop up as we have discussed thia situation many times here:

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This also might help

President Ford issued a clemency program that ran from Sept 1974 to March 1975 that affected draft dodgers.

 

"The Pentagon has said there are 93,250 deserters, of Which 10,115 are fugitives and 83,135 were discharged from the military service with undesirable, bad conduct or dishonorable discharges. Of the total, 19,144 took part in President Ford's clemency program.

That leaves 74,100 deserters uncovered either by Mr. Ford's clemency or Mr. Carter's pardon. About 4,550 deserters are still fugitives, but about 69,550 are back in civilian life with discharges under other than honorable conditions, which has made it hard for them to get jobs and ineligible for veterans’ benefits.”

https://www.nytimes.com/1977/03/11/archives/issue-and-debate-the-dispute-over-amnesty-for-deserters-a-legacy-of.html

However this fairly recent  BVA case might help:

This recent BVA decision mentions the pardon from President Ford.

"CONCLUSION OF LAW The character of the appellant's service does not constitute a bar to VA benefits. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 101, 5107, 5303 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.1, 3.12 (2014)."

https://www.va.gov/vetapp15/files1/1500467.txt

 

Did the VA make  a Character of Discharge decision which he is on appeal for?

If so would he permit you to scan and attach the decision as to why they denied and what Evidence they used?

(Cover his C file, name, etc prior to scanning it)

A personal note-have you see the veterans SMRs and 201 personnel file?

Favorable Character of Discharge decisions do not happen often.

Sometimes there are many factors for AWOL, and as the BVA case above shows the veteran had a sort of 'buddy statement '(March 1969 "Commander's Inquiry of AWOL Soldier).

I have dealt with a few cases like this -one was easy- a Period of Honorable Service followed by an OTH , for a separate period of  and the vet also had a pardon from President Carter.They were granted an HD  for both periods of service.

Easy- the others , at some point, had no basis nor any evidence that could overcome their bad paper.

These were DD discharged vets who had done nothing or would not take the steps via BCMR or anything I advised to get their records corrected. I guess they expected I knew of some bad paper miracle.

In another case, a widow here (on the older hadit board)contacted me by email ( My email is no longer available here) and she told me her story- a very long rendition- and I asked to see the veteran's DD214 and death certificate.Her DIC claim had been denied. She couldn't attach them in the email but did attach a VA decision.

He had died in prison , incarcerated because he had stolen money from the Military. No DIC possible there.

My point is- you need ALL the facts on this situation, and I assume you seen the veteran's DD 214 and anything he has received from the VA.

It is possible to get his discharge changed but it will not be easy if VA has already denied the Character of Discharge. I have even seen the VA determine a OTH was in fact a Dishonorable discharge. for VA purposes..

There are other decisions at the BVA web site regarding President Ford clemency pardons.

This vet was covered by the pardon but BVA found:


 

"2.  The actions that led to the appellant's discharge from service, including multiple periods of absence without leave (AWOL), constituted willful and persistent misconduct."

"ORDER The character of the appellant's discharge from service is a bar to entitlement to VA benefits and the appeal is denied."

https://www.va.gov/vetapp17/files2/1707308.txt

If you go t the BVA web site, and click on their search feture and put President Ford Pardon in the search feature other decisions will pop up.

The denied claims will reveal as much info on this issue ,as the awarded claims will.

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

There are historical precedents for the executive use of the clemency power to correct perceived wartime injustices. On September 16, 1974, President Ford issued a proclamation pardoning individuals who had evaded the draft for the Vietnam War in violation of the Military Selective Service Act or who had deserted their troops in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice between August 1964 and March 1973.24 In order to receive pardons under the proclamation, the “draft evaders and military deserters” were required to present themselves to a U.S. Attorney before January 31, 1975, execute agreements acknowledging allegiance to the United States, and engage in two years of alternate service under the Director of Selective Service, unless mitigating circumstances counseled in favor of a shorter period of alternate service.25 The proclamation stated that members of the Armed Forces who applied for pardons would receive undesirable discharges until they completed their alternate service, at which point they were eligible to receive a “clemency discharge” in lieu of an undesirable or OTH discharge.26 The proclamation established a Presidential Clemency Board by Executive Order to review the records of draft evaders and individuals who had received punitive or undesirable discharges.27 By the end of President’s Ford’s tenure, approximately 19,000 veterans had applied for clemency.28
 
The effects of President Ford’s clemency program were limited, as the proclamation expressly granted clemency discharges rather than honorable discharges and stated that clemency discharges “shall not bestow entitlement to benefits administered by the Veterans Administration.”29 To address the program’s limited impact, President Ford issued a memorandum on January 19, 1977, that directed the Presidential Clemency Board to grant honorable discharges to veterans “who were wounded in combat or who received decorations for valor in combat in Vietnam and subsequently received [OTH] discharges,” absent a “compelling reason to the contrary in any case.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

A person discharged under conditions other than honorable on the basis of an AWOL period of at least 180 days is barred from receipt of VA benefits "unless such person demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that there are compelling circumstances to warrant such prolonged unauthorized absence. " 38 U.S.C.A. § 5303(a) ; 38 C.F.R. § 3.12(c)(6).

Under 38 C.F.R. § 3.12(c)(6)(i-iii), the following factors are considered in determining whether there are "compelling circumstances" to warrant the prolonged unauthorized absence: (i) Length and character of service exclusive of the period of prolonged AWOL, and (ii) Reasons for going AWOL.

Service exclusive of the period of prolonged AWOL should generally be of such quality and length that it can be characterized as honest, faithful and meritorious, and of benefit to the Nation.  38 C.F.R. § 3.12(c)(6)(i).

Reasons for going AWOL which are entitled to be given consideration when offered by the claimant include family emergencies or obligations. The reasons for going AWOL are evaluated in terms of the person's age, cultural background, educational level, and judgmental maturity.  Consideration is given to how the situation appeared to the person and not how the adjudicator might have reacted.  Hardship or suffering incurred during overseas service, or as a result of combat wounds of other service-incurred or aggravated disability, is carefully and sympathetically considered in evaluating the person's state of mind at the time the prolonged AWOL period began. 38 C.F.R. § 3.12(c)(6)(ii).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use