Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

How to use 'Intent to File' for more than 1 future claim?

Rate this question


VN-Vet

Question

Hey Guys - I need to know if it is possible to file an 'Intent to File' and then submit multiple claims?

When I first started to file a few years back I was told just a letter stating that you would be filing for multiple claims for service connected disabilities, connected to conditions to, but not limited to,  disabilities,related to Agent Orange, back, injuries, scars, and more, would suffice for a year while you prepared your claim.

The was I read the info sheet on the new 'Intent to File' (21-0966), it looks like it is good for only your 'next' claim - and going by the VA example, it looks like you have to then file a claim before you can submit another 'Intent to File'.

This really doesn't make sense, and I would think there was a way to save the date for multiple claims - but in reading the forum it does not appear so, or at least I haven't looked in the right place yet.

So if possible, how do we file an 'Intent to File' for multiple claims?
 

https://www.benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/factsheets/general/ITF.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

The ITF form does not list a particular disability, such as PTSD, arthritis, etc.  It is a GENERAL form, and when you do file, you can request compensation for multiple disabilities, as applicable.  

You need only specify with THE ITF whether its pension, compensation, or DIC.  

https://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/VBA-21-0966-ARE.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks broncovet,

Are you saying I can or should 'list' all the conditions I may file for on the ITF? Or, that I should file multiple ITFs, 1 for each issue?

I read somewhere, I think here, that someone filed an ITF, for then gathered his info and while doing so found something else to file for that needed more documentation, then made his claim on the initial condition he filed the ITF, and was then only awarded back to the time of the second ITF filed.

Kind of confusing to me - and below are the examples the VA uses.

For example: VA receives an intent to file for compensation benefits on April 1, 2015, an application for compensation benefits (i.e., VA Form 526EZ, Application for Disability Compensation and Related Compensation Benefits) on August 1, 2015, and another application for compensation benefits on January 1, 2016. In this case, VA will consider an effective date of April 1, 2015, the date VA received the intent to file, for any benefits awarded as a result of the August 1, 2015 application. However, the April 1, 2015 intent to file date will not be used for any benefits awarded as a result of the January 1, 2016 application.


Consider the same circumstances as above, but a second intent to file for compensation benefits is received on October 1, 2015. In this case, VA will consider an effective date of April 1, 2015, the date we received the intent to file, for any benefits awarded as a result of the August 1, 2015 application. VA will also consider an effective of October 1, 2015 for any benefits awarded as a result of the January 1, 2016 application.

taken from:
https://www.benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/factsheets/general/ITF.pdf 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The ITF form states:

Quote

IMPORTANT: After receiving this form, VA will give you the appropriate application to file for the general benefit you select above. You can also apply for VA disability compensation online through eBenefits at www.ebenefits.va.gov. If you give VA a completed application for the selected general benefit within one year of filing this form, your completed application will be considered filed as of the date of receipt of this form. Only the first completed application for each selected general benefit that is received after you file this form will be considered filed as of the date of receipt of this form. You may indicate your intent to file for more than one general benefit on this form or you may submit a separate intent to file for each general benefit. Please complete as many fields in Section II as possible. VA cannot process this form if we cannot identify the claimant and veteran.

The way I read this, it means that you can do either..file an ITF for each, or one ITF can be used.  Yours is actually a very good question.  

VA LOOOOVES to confuse Veterans, so they can "loose out" on benefits.  The ITF itself is confusing.  Why would you not just "file" rather than "intent to file"??  Personally, I  dont use ITF, I use the following form:

https://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/VBA-21-526ez-ARE.pdf

You can file up to 20 disabilities on that form.  For me, the ITF is useless.  Are they gonna have an Intent to file an ITF form?? 

Still, the ITF can be useful in some circumstances.  The only one I can think of is if you are still in the military to get the paperwork started.  Others may chime in here, but I dont use the ITF, and consider it an annoyance.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hey broncovet, Thanks for the nudge. 

Unless someone who knows for sure shares their wisdom, I'll call the VA and ask. I would rather email them somehow so I have something in writing - I'll have to search to see if that is possible.

The uncertainty has me stymied for now.

I also do not see any reference on the VA site on how I thought dates were calculated. I had thought until now, that the VA only used months in a calculation, whereas, as long as something was filed by the end of the month, you were able to claim the whole month. Now I am perceiving that the  VA uses exact dates. Anyone know for sure? But I digress.

You see what I see - the form states: "You may indicate your intent to file for more than one general benefit on this form or you may submit a separate intent to file for each general benefit".

I am now concerned that  means 1 or more of the Benefits listed below.
 
Benefits:             
Dependency and Indemnity Compensation Benefits for Survivors and Dependents            Pension Benefits for Veterans   
Pension Benefits for Survivors   
Education Benefits for Veterans
Home Loan Benefits for Servicemembers and Veterans 
Home Loan Benefits for Survivors            
Life Insurance Benefits for Servicemembers, Veterans, and Survivors

I hope this is wrong - but I would have thought it would we worded more clearly otherwise - such as the form can be used to as notice you intend to file multiple disability  or compensation claims in the next year.

If you can only use 1 ITF per claim, and that claim has to be decided before you file another ITF again - then that removes the ability to preserve a date while you build your claims on multiple disabilities at the same time. That doesn't seem fair and not what I was told just a few years ago - correct me if I misunderstood this in the first place.



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

you should be able to file each ITF Claim separate on e benefit's. 

for each condition your claiming...as long as you submit the ITF Claim button for each condition...the hard part is you need to remember to file for these claims within a year , so mark your calendar and be sure you know what claims you just sent in for a ITF. 

this is when you send in your evidence and perfect your claim.  and get that EED.

Example  ITF a claim for hearing loss...hit that ITF BUTTON for hearing loss.

Then for another condition say for PTSD  hit that ITF Button for that

and so on.

VA will gather all these conditions up and appoint a R.O. to work them. you will probably be sent out C&P Exams and if you have  an exam on a date you have other exams  then you need to let the VA Know this so they can reschedule.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use