Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Fighting a preposal to reduce!

Rate this question


Buck52

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Question

Are the authorities (VA) Obligated or required to give the source of information as to when they state in the proposal letter to the veteran '' we have been informed that your S.C. Disability you're currently rated at 60% has improved and a reduction in your benefits will be reduced back to 0% although you will keep this disability at 0%S.C.  you have 60 days as to respond from this letter.

Can a veteran ask or request where they got their Information? that his  S.C.Disability has Improved?

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Is this a proposal to reduce for you, or someone else?  If its for you, THEN you enjoy the 5 year, and probably 10 year protections.  

Attorney Katrina Eagle recommended the Veteran "request a hearing" in each proposal to reduce. Reasons:

1.  It buys time, because it always takes time for a hearing.  I think she said benefits will continue until after the hearing, at least. 

2.  It also buys time (60 days is the "proposed reduction"), so you can order and get the cfile, and find out answers to Bucks questions. 

3.  The burden is on VA to prove that the SC conditions "actually improved under ordinary conditions of life" and not due to the VEts staying off a SC foot, for example. ( not the VEt)  The law makes it clear that unless a clear sustained improvement occurred, the rating must be continued.    However, supposedly the VA has at least some evidence, else they would not have done a PR (proposed reduction).  

4.  This gives the Veteran (and/or his rep) time to "refute" the PR, sometimes with an IMO/IME as applicable.  

5.  You want to defend the PR aggressively and timely.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

No not for me another veteran at my VAMC...Ask me this question...

Yeah I mention to him he keeps his rating and continue to be paid until a decision is made I told him about request a DRO Hearing  the whole 9 yards...but I was not sure how he can request information the VA MENTION THEY HAD RECEIVED IN HIS PROPOSAL TO REDUCE THAT HIS s.c. condition has improved?

  I was thinking that if the VA With holds this information  then they broke the due process but due process don't start until an appeal has been started  but they may CUE them self  I am not sure? I tried to think what Ms Berta had mention about asking the VA to CUE them selfs.

I mention to him the only thing I can think of is a VA Dr wrote up an medical report on him and said in his opinion his s.c. conditions has improved and no longer has this condition and is not a disabling condition... I said something close to this...otherwise I don't know how he can find out who said his S.C. Condition has improved.?

I did tell him to respond ASAP  Let them know what you want to do  if you do nothing then they will take away your benefits...by not respond to the VA to them that means your condition must have improved  and they take the appropriate action. 

I think the VA is required to let the Veteran know who and why they are making a proposal to reduce benefits based on the information they recieved.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The proposal letter the veteran received will state why they proposed to reduce.

If he lets you read it and gives you permission to scan and attach it here (without his C file #, name,address) we can determine what he should do- I doubt highly if this letter contains a CUE.

Also we would need to see the C & P exam this was based on, but as Matt Hill's article below shows there are Many reasons the VA can try to reduce a rating.

I mentioned before my personal experience with this type of letter.

It came on December 24th 1988, after my husband had started Voc Rehab and was employed at the VA,by then for about 6 months.

I used the regulations they enclosed with the proposed reduction , and their rationale in the letter, against them and also stated basic common sense ,in the NOD. A few months later the POA called, Rod was at work, so he asked me who prepared the NOD and then he told me they had dropped the proposal based on the NOD. This was not the result of any C & P exam.

 

If we can't read the letter this vet got- there isn't much we can advise on.

 

I

 

 

 

 " Once the rating has been in place for at least 5 years, it is considered stabilized and protected.  When a reduction is proposed, all evidence of record must show an improvement.  In other words, one exam cannot be the sole basis for the decision.  Additionally, if your disability is subject to temporary and episodic improvement, evidence must show sustained, continual improvement to allow a decrease."

https://www.hillandponton.com/responding-to-rating-reduction-proper-va-procedure/

 

"9.18  REDUCTION IN EVALUATION-COMPENSATION (38 CFR 3.105(a))

 

                  a.  Error in Determination.  To reduce a service-connected evaluation under 38 CFR 3.105(a), prepare a rating proposing the change.  Cite all material facts and the reasons for the proposed action.  Use the legend "PROPOSAL TO REDUCE UNDER 38 CFR 3.105(a)and 3.105(e)."  Include the proposed evaluation and, if applicable, the proposed combined evaluation.  The ratings of Rating Veterans Service Representatives (RSVRs) must be signed by the VSCM or a supervisory designee not lower than coach.  The ratings of Decision Review Officers must be signed by the VSCM or Assistant VSCM."

https://www.benefits.va.gov/warms/docs/admin21/m21_1/part4/chg197.doc

Edited by Berta
added link

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 Ms berta I'll pass on your information to him   if I see him again.

I don't have the letter  I was just visiting with him at my VAMC  We use the same MH Clinic...I may see him again and I'll ask him about the letter....this is all he told me during our conversation.

I did tell him to check with his VSO on this and don't take it lightly...I am not sure how long he has been S.C.? And I don't know what for? I assume maybe PTSD but it might be for other conditions on the proposal?

his question to me was 

Can the VA withhold the information they recieved that his disability has shown improvement to make a proposal to reduce? do they  have to report this information?

I was confused and not sure what to tell him?

I did said it should be on the letter as why the proposal so I had him to check with his VSO, He did say his VSO was preparing the NOD.

I'll probably see him again  and I did gave him one of Ms Tbird hadit cards I printed out.

I did tell him to make sure his VSO is on this.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use